![]() |
Originally Posted by trailblazer
(Post 815986)
What you guys are hearing has some truth. You are going to get An additional 100 aircraft this year. Mostly from Comair when delta shuts them down. One of the biggest reason for Comair going away is because of the lawsuite from the 50 seater crash. From what I have been told you are going to grow big. The future is looking good for you guys. Your job is secured. Congrats...
I just spit my milk through my nose. Someone thinks an aviation job is "secure." :D:eek::p |
|
Originally Posted by trailblazer
(Post 815986)
One of the biggest reason for Comair going away is because of the lawsuite from the 50 seater crash.
If you care to check the record, Delta was released from the liability in the 5191 accident nearly three years ago. Furthermore, Comair carried ample insurance sufficient to pay all claims and expenses. So will more Comair assets get sold off? Quite possibly as Delta seeks cut deals with the F4D carriers without spending a lot of cash, but it will have nothing to do with the 5191 accident or any other safety issue. |
Originally Posted by SuperPilotJesse
(Post 815158)
FYI:
If you haven't see the Comair thread Trailblazer is just a troll.
Originally Posted by Been There
(Post 816035)
And what's Delta going to do when the mainline has another accident and gets sued? Sell it too?
If you care to check the record, Delta was released from the liability in the 5191 accident nearly three years ago. Furthermore, Comair carried ample insurance sufficient to pay all claims and expenses. So will more Comair assets get sold off? Quite possibly as Delta seeks cut deals with the F4D carriers without spending a lot of cash, but it will have nothing to do with the 5191 accident or any other safety issue. |
Originally Posted by trailblazer
(Post 815986)
You are going to get An additional 100 aircraft this year. Mostly from Comair when delta shuts them down.
1) What about the three-party fleet guarantee that Delta signed with Comair and ALPA? Delta can't give ASA (sorry, Atlantic Southeast)Comair's fleet any more than they can give them Northwest's fleet. 2) Why would ASA want to get 70 50-seaters from Comair? So Delta can furlough Comair pilots now, and furlough ASA pilots next year when they come off lease? Any explanations for these speedbumps, Trailblazer? |
Originally Posted by trailblazer
(Post 815152)
Flying 500 airplanes to all 50 states...
Wouldn't MidAtlantic-SkyWest-East-North-AlaskAloha be more appropriate? Freedom, Trans States, GoJetsssssss and Republic are all better names for a nation-wide airline than Atlantic Southeast. I guess that's why airlines spend millions of dollars on these rebranding boondoggles? |
Originally Posted by Boomer
(Post 816166)
If you were going to rebrand an airline and start flying to all 50 states, why would you rename it Atlantic Southeast?
Wouldn't MidAtlantic-SkyWest-East-North-AlaskAloha be more appropriate? Freedom, Trans States, GoJetsssssss and Republic are all better names for a nation-wide airline than Atlantic Southeast. I guess that's why airlines spend millions of dollars on these rebranding boondoggles? |
Originally Posted by SuperPilotJesse
(Post 816168)
Um... Northwest was a pretty big airline.
And when Northwest had a chance to rebrand, they went with the name Delta. And when Republic rebranded MidWest, they went with Frontier. And when Atlantic Coast Airlines rebranded they went with Independence Air. And when Wings West merged into Simmons, they went with American Eagle. And when America West rebranded, they went with USAirways. So why would Atlantic Southeast rebrand themselves as Atlantic Southeast if they want to be the new 50-state super regional? Seems like a missed opportunity to me. Or maybe Trailblazer is just smoking crack again... |
I wouldn't say that NWA rebranded, they were bought and merged.
But they did in the 60s to NWA Orient and then dropped in the 90s... So they rebranded twice and kept the Northwest name. |
Fair enough, but you're missing my point.
If Trailblazer is right and SkyWest is reinventing ASA to be a nation-wide "super-regional", why would they keep the name that ties them to one corner of the United States? Many Airlines start with a homey name so the locals buying tickets think they're supporting the guy next door. When they grow into regional, national, and global airlines, the logical trend would be to dump the local name for one with a wider appeal to stand out amongst the other airlines in the phone book/travel site. If John Q Public wants to fly from Kansas City to Dallas, here are some airlines he would not even consider because of their names: Alaska Hawaiian Cape Air Georgia Skies Great Lakes Grand Canyon Air Wisconsin Any airline that starts with "Chaut" I'm just sayin'... |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:53 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands