![]() |
Originally Posted by Hatrick32
(Post 836019)
Can someone please PM me Ashley Hodges email or tell me where I can find it. I got an email from Chuck Colgan last week to call him but have yet to get a hold of him. Thanks
same thing, they wanted me to call before noon. Never got a hold of anyone, I guess we'll will miss the interviews they had scheduled for the 6th and 7th. |
Originally Posted by BillyBaroo
(Post 836441)
Just making a comment from page 1, and was more of an objective statement on my part. To each his own.....however......my point was that if you have failed two check-rides, and only meet the minimums of 1000/100, one maybe should think about gaining more experience before leaping into a higher performance aircraft......but each situation is unique, and up to the hiring panel.
Ahhhh I gotcha...and I concur |
Originally Posted by BillyBaroo
(Post 836205)
If someone has less than 1000/100 and two failures, they probably should not be trying to apply to the airlines just yet IMHO
|
Originally Posted by mooney
(Post 836497)
What an idea!.......fill your bucket of experience before you empty you bucket of luck.... time building and making mistakes you didn't get a chance to learn from yet in a high performance tprop flying 70 people around! Billy you would make a terrible JetU marketing director :)
|
Originally Posted by frmrdashtrash
(Post 836003)
If you've got an internal rec from Colgan, I'd question that friendship....
We all understand that the ONLY respectable regional airlines out there are those that pilots will STILL CONTINUE to talk **** about regardless of the quality of contract, strength of the pilot force, management purity (oxymoron, I know). It doesn't matter who one works for, it'll never be good enough until one moves onto the major airlines. I have yet to read a thread on here about ANY regional carrier, whether it's classified as a "regional" or "major" by the DOT, that did not have some sort of negative connotation to it. And more of then than not, it's the SAME people on here that post the negative comments :rolleyes: DISCUSS... ;) |
so this is who we are?
|
Originally Posted by FerrisBluer
(Post 837139)
|
Originally Posted by The Juice
(Post 835981)
I understand your point but if you have 1000/100 it might as well be 900/75, both are not that competitive unless you have a strong internal rec.
|
I have 1240/ 206ME. I have them on my airlineapps but haven't heard a peep. Granted I'm not trying that hard to get on with them either.
|
Originally Posted by captain152
(Post 837123)
Of course ... Colgan will never been good enough ... Pinnacle will never be good enough ... #$%*#* will never be good enough. All the pilots here at Colgan suck at life because they made the worst career decision possible. No one will ever move on because our company is so bad. We only hire the worst pilots we can possible find (sarcasm anyone??). Blah, blah, blah, blah. Just so we're clear, we ALL understand that EVERYONE apparently hates Colgan and Pinnacle. Our payrates are horrible, we don't have a contract, our management sucks ... etc.
We all understand that the ONLY respectable regional airlines out there are those that pilots will STILL CONTINUE to talk **** about regardless of the quality of contract, strength of the pilot force, management purity (oxymoron, I know). It doesn't matter who one works for, it'll never be good enough until one moves onto the major airlines. I have yet to read a thread on here about ANY regional carrier, whether it's classified as a "regional" or "major" by the DOT, that did not have some sort of negative connotation to it. And more of then than not, it's the SAME people on here that post the negative comments :rolleyes: DISCUSS... ;) |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:32 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands