![]() |
Originally Posted by floydbird
(Post 885519)
ALPA is supposed to be a union. That means it is supposed to be an "organization of workers formed for the purpose of advancing its members' interests in respect to wages, benefits, and working conditions."
ALPA should be looking out for the interests of Airline Pilots...not people who aren't airline pilots yet. The corrupt band of yahoos that lead ALPA are blinded so badly by their desire to "sit at the table" that they are selling out the very people they are supposed represent. Perhaps they honestly believe they are helping...problem is they are not. Lowering barriers to entry into the profession only serves to dilute our skill and positions we've obtained to our detriment. What they have done and are doing hurts all of us...airline pilots AND people who want to be airline pilots. CAPA, now. |
Originally Posted by PeezDog
(Post 885569)
How they got threw the interview I don't know.
End rant. Rebuttals? I won't go further into semantics or proper spelling, because I do agree with your main point. I think certain training should have "incentives" or "rewards" because some programs provide value beyond tooling around with the proverbial banner in tow. For certain. However, knocking the requirement down to 500 guts the spirit of the 1500 hour rule. How about 1500 hours for the ERAU (et al.) grads and something more for the mom and pop trainees. Please tell me congress isn't dumbing things down to 500 TT. I say foul!! :mad: |
Originally Posted by block30
(Post 885580)
Well...ok then....
I won't go further into semantics or proper spelling, because I do agree with your main point. I think certain training should have "incentives" or "rewards" because some programs provide value beyond tooling around with the proverbial banner in tow. For certain. However, knocking the requirement down to 500 guts the spirit of the 1500 hour rule. How about 1500 hours for the ERAU (et al.) grads and something more for the mom and pop trainees. Please tell me congress isn't dumbing things down to 500 TT. I say foul!! :mad: If a pilot wants a leg up in the hiring process then good for them. Add additional qualifications ..... like your riddle degree to your 1500 hours. |
Originally Posted by PeezDog
(Post 885569)
I've been in airline systems classes where people had no clue about high altitude aerodymaics, jet systems, high altitude weather. Some didn't know why most jets have a swept wing. How they got threw the interview I don't know. At this level you should have some knowledge of those things. I just don't think your initial training course at an airline is the place to be exposed to that for the first time. Courses at an accredited school prepare you for that. Knowledge is power.
I'm not saying that I was ready to fly for the airlines right out of the box, I wasn't, that's why I CFI'd and did some 135 stuff. I'm also not saying that I know it all because I went to Riddle, or that I'm the greatest pilot ever because I went to Riddle, or that Riddle is the greatest school ever. We definitely should have a much higher time requirement. I agree, that real world experience is everything. But if your real world experience consists of single-engine flight time over a beach for 1500hrs, I don't think that makes the cut. Another problem is how to make it fair as well. End rant. Rebuttals? THIS IS WHAT SHOULD BE REQUIRED FOR EVERY AIRLINE PILOT! NO NEGOTIATIONS PERIOD!
|
Originally Posted by block30
(Post 885580)
Well...ok then....
I won't go further into semantics or proper spelling, because I do agree with your main point. |
Response to above statements..... Well the C student will have to answer to the person giving the interview, if they get that far. I know I did. I wasn't a C student but my transcript was far from perfect and they drilled me on it. I think meeting the ATP mins is good. But just because you can memorize some answers from a book or memorize how to work THROUGH (there I spelled it right) a problem, doesn't necessarily mean you understand it. But at least you learn something form it. If you can past the test, I would say you are probably good to go. I think that the ATP written is in a serious need of an upgrade though. I think that training as a whole, from private to ATP needs to be upgraded. Every school should be part 141 or better. I think the FAA needs to be held more accountable for how pilots are trained. And of course a 1500 pilot is going to better than when he had 500. Just like your better at 5000 then when your at 1500 and so on.
What do you guys think of this - instead of an ATP written, pilots must have taken, and passed, certain academic courses in order to meet those requirements. Courses that deal with more advanced aircraft and the subjects related to it. Theoretically, the current way, someone could go from private to CFI, get the flight time for the ATP, without ever touching as much as a Cessna and whatever for their multi rating, take the test, pass, and still not fully understand some of the subject matters related to flying high performance aircraft. Am I wrong with that theory? According to some of you, that would be acceptable. As long as they got the ATP right? And why is there no multi engine requirement in the ATP? |
Is there any relief for military pilots on the 1500 hr rule
|
Originally Posted by yodafly
(Post 885725)
Is there any relief for military pilots on the 1500 hr rule
|
Originally Posted by yodafly
(Post 885725)
Is there any relief for military pilots on the 1500 hr rule
Originally Posted by BlueMoon
(Post 885767)
As of right now, I don't believe so.
With the commitments such as they are I'm not sure that there are too many communities out there that can't reach that goal after meeting the minimum service commitments. USMCFLYR |
Originally Posted by buddies8
(Post 885504)
you probably are also for doctors internship be reduce by 60 percents if they just watch some youtube of surgery's.
Originally Posted by yodafly
(Post 885725)
Is there any relief for military pilots on the 1500 hr rule
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:00 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands