Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
Committee Challenges New 1500 Hr Requirement >

Committee Challenges New 1500 Hr Requirement

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Committee Challenges New 1500 Hr Requirement

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-15-2010 | 07:32 PM
  #31  
mmaviator's Avatar
pants on the ground
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,359
Likes: 0
From: back seat
Default

Originally Posted by floydbird
ALPA is supposed to be a union. That means it is supposed to be an "organization of workers formed for the purpose of advancing its members' interests in respect to wages, benefits, and working conditions."

ALPA should be looking out for the interests of Airline Pilots...not people who aren't airline pilots yet.

The corrupt band of yahoos that lead ALPA are blinded so badly by their desire to "sit at the table" that they are selling out the very people they are supposed represent. Perhaps they honestly believe they are helping...problem is they are not. Lowering barriers to entry into the profession only serves to dilute our skill and positions we've obtained to our detriment. What they have done and are doing hurts all of us...airline pilots AND people who want to be airline pilots.

CAPA, now.
That makes a lot of sense....maybe too much sense.
Reply
Old 10-15-2010 | 07:36 PM
  #32  
block30's Avatar
Thread Starter
Bracing for Fallacies
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,543
Likes: 0
From: In favor of good things, not in favor of bad things
Default

Originally Posted by PeezDog
How they got threw the interview I don't know.

End rant. Rebuttals?
Well...ok then....

I won't go further into semantics or proper spelling, because I do agree with your main point. I think certain training should have "incentives" or "rewards" because some programs provide value beyond tooling around with the proverbial banner in tow. For certain.

However, knocking the requirement down to 500 guts the spirit of the 1500 hour rule. How about 1500 hours for the ERAU (et al.) grads and something more for the mom and pop trainees. Please tell me congress isn't dumbing things down to 500 TT. I say foul!!
Reply
Old 10-15-2010 | 07:50 PM
  #33  
Airbum's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 674
Likes: 8
Default

Originally Posted by block30
Well...ok then....

I won't go further into semantics or proper spelling, because I do agree with your main point. I think certain training should have "incentives" or "rewards" because some programs provide value beyond tooling around with the proverbial banner in tow. For certain.

However, knocking the requirement down to 500 guts the spirit of the 1500 hour rule. How about 1500 hours for the ERAU (et al.) grads and something more for the mom and pop trainees. Please tell me congress isn't dumbing things down to 500 TT. I say foul!!
Even a riddle grad should be better at 1500 hours then he/she was at 500 hours. all hours are not the same but neither are students. Do C students get the same "credit" as A students?

If a pilot wants a leg up in the hiring process then good for them. Add additional qualifications ..... like your riddle degree to your 1500 hours.
Reply
Old 10-15-2010 | 08:10 PM
  #34  
DashDriverYV's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 406
Likes: 0
From: back in the right
Default

Originally Posted by PeezDog
I've been in airline systems classes where people had no clue about high altitude aerodymaics, jet systems, high altitude weather. Some didn't know why most jets have a swept wing. How they got threw the interview I don't know. At this level you should have some knowledge of those things. I just don't think your initial training course at an airline is the place to be exposed to that for the first time. Courses at an accredited school prepare you for that. Knowledge is power.

I'm not saying that I was ready to fly for the airlines right out of the box, I wasn't, that's why I CFI'd and did some 135 stuff. I'm also not saying that I know it all because I went to Riddle, or that I'm the greatest pilot ever because I went to Riddle, or that Riddle is the greatest school ever. We definitely should have a much higher time requirement. I agree, that real world experience is everything. But if your real world experience consists of single-engine flight time over a beach for 1500hrs, I don't think that makes the cut. Another problem is how to make it fair as well.

End rant. Rebuttals?
Do you think 1500 hours is it? Dragging a banner up and down the street for a couple of summers wont get you the ATP or even meet the requirements.

THIS IS WHAT SHOULD BE REQUIRED FOR EVERY AIRLINE PILOT!

NO NEGOTIATIONS PERIOD!
  1. Be at least 23 years of age.
  2. Be able to read, speak, write, and understand the English language.
  3. Be of good moral character.
  4. Meet at least one of the following:
  5. Hold at least a commercial pilot certificate and an instrument rating.
  6. Meet the military experience requirements (listed in FAR 61.73) to qualify for a commercial pilot certificate and an instrument rating.
  7. Hold either a foreign ATP or a foreign commercial pilot license and an instrument rating, without limitations, issued by a member nation of the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO).
  8. Hold at least a current FAA third-class medical certificate. Later, if your flying requires an ATP certificate, you must hold a first-class medical certificate.
  9. Receive and log ground training from an authorized instructor, or complete a home-study course (such as studying Airline Transport Pilot FAA Knowledge Test and Aviation Weather and Weather Services) to learn (61.155)
  10. Applicable Federal Aviation Regulations . . . that relate to airline transport pilot privileges, limitations, and flight operations.
  11. Meteorology, including knowledge of and effects of fronts, frontal characteristics, cloud formations, icing, and upper-air data.
  12. General systems of weather and NOTAM collection, dissemination, interpretation, and use.
  13. Interpretation and use of weather charts, maps, forecasts, sequence reports, abbreviations, and symbols.
  14. National Weather Service functions as they pertain to operations in the National Airspace System.
  15. Windshear and microburst awareness, identification, and avoidance.
  16. Principles of air navigation under instrument meteorological conditions in the National Airspace System.
  17. Air traffic control procedures and pilot responsibilities as they relate to en route operations, terminal area and radar operations, and instrument departure and approach procedures.
  18. Aircraft loading, weight and balance, use of charts, graphs, tables, formulas, and computations, and their effect on aircraft performance.
  19. Aerodynamics relating to an aircraft's flight characteristics and performance in normal and abnormal flight regimes.
  20. Human factors.
  21. Aeronautical decision making and judgment.
  22. Crew resource management to include crew communication and coordination.
  23. Pass a pilot knowledge test with a score of 70% or better.
    1. A knowledge test is not required for you to add another aircraft type rating to your ATP certificate if your ATP certificate lists the aircraft category and class rating that is appropriate to the type rating sought.
  24. Accumulate flight experience (FAR 61.159).
    1. Except as provided in b. and c. on the next page, you must log at least 1,500 hr. of total time as a pilot that includes at least
      1. 500 hr. of cross-country flight time
      2. 100 hr. of night flight time
        1. A person who has performed at least 20 night takeoffs and landings to a full stop may substitute each additional night takeoff and landing to a full stop for 1 hr. of night flight time, limited to not more than 25 hr. of night flight time.
      3. 75 hr. of actual or simulated instrument flight time
        1. The maximum time that may be accumulated in a flight simulator or flight training device, representing an airplane, is either
          1. 25 hr., if the training is not conducted under FAR Part 142, or
          2. 50 hr., if the training is conducted under FAR Part 142.
      4. 250 hr. of flight time as PIC of an airplane, or as SIC performing the duties and functions of a PIC under the supervision of a PIC, or by any combination of the two. This requirement must include
        1. 100 hr. of cross-country time
        2. 25 hr. of night flight time
        NOTE: Not more than 100 hr. of the total aeronautical experience requirements may be obtained in a flight simulator or a flight training device that represents an airplane, provided the experience was obtained in a course conducted under FAR Part 142.
Reply
Old 10-15-2010 | 08:29 PM
  #35  
PeezDog's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 419
Likes: 0
From: CRJ
Default

Originally Posted by block30
Well...ok then....

I won't go further into semantics or proper spelling, because I do agree with your main point.
Thanks for agreeing, and thanks for pointing out the one misspelled word in my whole rant.
Reply
Old 10-15-2010 | 09:14 PM
  #36  
PeezDog's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 419
Likes: 0
From: CRJ
Default

Response to above statements..... Well the C student will have to answer to the person giving the interview, if they get that far. I know I did. I wasn't a C student but my transcript was far from perfect and they drilled me on it. I think meeting the ATP mins is good. But just because you can memorize some answers from a book or memorize how to work THROUGH (there I spelled it right) a problem, doesn't necessarily mean you understand it. But at least you learn something form it. If you can past the test, I would say you are probably good to go. I think that the ATP written is in a serious need of an upgrade though. I think that training as a whole, from private to ATP needs to be upgraded. Every school should be part 141 or better. I think the FAA needs to be held more accountable for how pilots are trained. And of course a 1500 pilot is going to better than when he had 500. Just like your better at 5000 then when your at 1500 and so on.

What do you guys think of this - instead of an ATP written, pilots must have taken, and passed, certain academic courses in order to meet those requirements. Courses that deal with more advanced aircraft and the subjects related to it. Theoretically, the current way, someone could go from private to CFI, get the flight time for the ATP, without ever touching as much as a Cessna and whatever for their multi rating, take the test, pass, and still not fully understand some of the subject matters related to flying high performance aircraft. Am I wrong with that theory? According to some of you, that would be acceptable. As long as they got the ATP right? And why is there no multi engine requirement in the ATP?
Reply
Old 10-16-2010 | 06:58 AM
  #37  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
Default

Is there any relief for military pilots on the 1500 hr rule
Reply
Old 10-16-2010 | 08:25 AM
  #38  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,045
Likes: 1
From: FO
Default

Originally Posted by yodafly
Is there any relief for military pilots on the 1500 hr rule
As of right now, I don't believe so.
Reply
Old 10-16-2010 | 08:47 AM
  #39  
USMCFLYR's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 13,843
Likes: 1
From: FAA 'Flight Check'
Default

Originally Posted by yodafly
Is there any relief for military pilots on the 1500 hr rule
Originally Posted by BlueMoon
As of right now, I don't believe so.
Nor should there be unless there is language that waters down the requirements for others in my opinion.
With the commitments such as they are I'm not sure that there are too many communities out there that can't reach that goal after meeting the minimum service commitments.

USMCFLYR
Reply
Old 10-16-2010 | 10:31 AM
  #40  
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,934
Likes: 0
From: EMB 145 CPT
Default

Originally Posted by buddies8
you probably are also for doctors internship be reduce by 60 percents if they just watch some youtube of surgery's.
People are bashing ALPA because this does not help the supply side of the economic equation. My only point is that maybe ALPA believes that safety is more important. I do think there should be credit given. I just beleive that 1000 hours credit is a bit too much.

Originally Posted by yodafly
Is there any relief for military pilots on the 1500 hr rule
The ARC just submitted their recommendations. Its not know what they recommended, if anything, for military pilots. The FAA will issue an NPRM and we will see if they do propose giving them credit. At that point, everyone will be able to comment and give their opinion. Hopefully, the FAA will issue a final rule that is fair to military pilots.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
PEACH
Union Talk
8
03-30-2010 08:40 AM
PEACH
Major
14
11-07-2009 08:20 AM
Russ
Regional
50
12-19-2008 11:28 AM
WatchThis!
Regional
63
07-11-2008 09:52 AM
captchris
Regional
35
04-02-2008 08:05 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices