![]() |
Originally Posted by nightice
(Post 890487)
Boarding behind parents and retirees..I never understood why an active employee trying to commute gets bumped by parents and retirees going on a cruise. How and why do Skywest/ASA and Comair get "full benefits"? Why isn't is consistent across the DCI groups? The former 2 are not even wholly-owned. And how much more would it cost to get what the others had pre-merger NWA? I think most would rather pay the $200 maximum per family per year for full benefits.
|
Originally Posted by bored
(Post 890774)
At least at XJ, we do have a commuter policy, which is quite good and allows unlimited use. It's written into the FOM, not the contract, so its future under our new mgmt is unknown. That's why writing special commuter clauses into our pass privileges is unnecessary.
|
Just a heads up
At ExpressJet we fly at the SAME priority as the CAL employees. Our planes or their planes its the same priority. Flying the same people so why should be nonrev at different priority. Normal travel is $12.50 one way domestic ($15 if you make a connection). International fees vary by destination. No Annual fee. All normal fee based nonrev passes are unlimited. Just like them we also get up to 16 "vacation passes" each year depending on dependents. These are one way passes so up to 8 round trips where you get a "super priority" and also fee waived travel regardless of cabin class. Seats open in first from EWR to NRT well if you are using a vacation pass you just got yourself 16 hours in first for free up to 8 round trips this year. Vacation passes are good for 5 years so if you dont use all 16 they roll over. You dont have to use them just for vacation, its just what they are called. You can use them for commuting if you like. For me I will never use one for commuting because they are just to valuable for free international travel. Here is an example of what a nonrev list might look like. Remember we all travel at the same priority so date of hire is all that matters. CAL or XTT employee doesnt matter. Hire date Discription 2000 employee on Vacation pass 2001 employee on Vacation pass 2000 dependent traveling alone on Vacation pass 1986 employee on normal pass 1999 employee on normal pass 1965 dependent traveling alone on a normal pass (dependents travel at the same priority as their respective employee if they are accompanied by said employee) Jumpseat is different depending on if the flight is ours or theirs. They are OAL on us and we are OAL on them. Our United pass travel is absolutely horrible as far as priority and cost with no vacation pass at all. It is anyones guess as to what might happen after our merger and the UAL/CAL merger. Our travel bennies are not contractual, although they should be, but we were just lucky and kept what we had from the ole COEX days. In my opinion, regional airlines shouldnt exist to begin with but at the very least we should get the exact same travel benefits as the mainline employees and nothing less. We fly the same customers. Dont settle for less if you actually get a chance to negotiate for this. |
Originally Posted by avi8tor4life
(Post 888372)
- Some regionals (ie SKW) will stand up for their employees because they rely on a certain amount of labor goodwill. Since it doesn't cost them much or anything to stand up to DL, they will do that.
Really?! Standup for us?! What have you been smoking. If they wanted a little goodwill they'd have kept the health insurance options instead of forcing the HSA on everyone. SkyWest will do what SkyWest wants regardless of what goodwill may be lost by labor. They don't care anymore. It doesn't cost SKW money to stand up to DL when DL comes looking to bump us on our own airplanes. SKW is not negotiating new contracts with DL right now so it's not a big deal. DL might be able to get FREE employee goodwill by giving them higher priority on DCI/SKW...so they will ask. SKW can get FREE employee goodwill (or at least avoid more badwill) by telling DL to pound sand. Doesn't cost anything to say "No". |
Originally Posted by bored
(Post 891277)
Cencal... we at XJ are fully prepared for the butt kicking in QOL we will take when Corp. starts making changes at the new XJ. Remember, we didn't ask for this. It is what it is and we are prepared for a fight. This is why it's so important we come together and try for the best possible outcome with one JCBA and one fair SLI.
As for "call in honest." Well... I realize anything in the FOM is up for removal at a whim, it is sort of in the companies best interest to offer a commuter policy. I think that's why XJ has it. It works for both parties. But, we all know what road PCL mgmt takes when something could possibly benefit an employee. Perhaps moving the XJ "call in honest" policy into the JCBA is the way to go. I still don't believe that a special boarding priority for commuters is the right way to handle the situation. |
Originally Posted by hockeypilot44
(Post 891735)
The NWA call-in-honest policy was removed with the merger with Delta. What makes you think a regionals' call-in-honest policy is going to stick?
|
Originally Posted by Captain Tony
(Post 888986)
By the way, I'm LOVING flying the 700 and 900 in Memphis, but I wish you'd get your little broken down 200 out of the way so I don't have to slow to 250 200 miles out, because I prefer cruising on in at .82. The "little" 200 actually cruises faster in RVSM than the 7 and 9. I've deleted most of the mud slinging in this thread, I hope. |
Originally Posted by TonyWilliams
(Post 891830)
The "little" 200 actually cruises faster in RVSM than the 7 and 9.
Not bragging, just making sure the facts are straight. |
You're not getting slowed because we're randomly deciding to slow down. I haven't had a day in a while that MEM center hasn't slowed me down while I was still on the arrival. Flow control into MEM used to be unheard of, now we're seeing it pretty often on short hops from FSM, XNA and some of the other shorter leg length stations. Oh, and I'll be a bit more concerned about flying faster to get there on-time when the company is concerned about getting us a decent contract. Until then, as long as the passengers are gonna make their connections (which how the banks are constructed in MEM, you can be pretty late and still see people make their connections), I really couldn't care less about what time we're gonna get to the gate.
Now, on the pass benefits, I'm still wanting "fly confirmed for less" back. Loved that with NWA, and as soon as Delta handed down the "DCI contract carrier" package, that was one of the first things gone. I LIKED being able to buy a severely discounted POSITIVE SPACE ticket for my wife and kid to go on vacation. FedEx works great for me, but I can't take my family with me. With the loads how they have been for about the past year, it's touch and go if I'd be able to take them with me on space available travel anyway, especially with the newly hired ramper from Delta taking his mom bumping us off.... |
Originally Posted by djrogs03
(Post 888177)
There has been talk with the Delta Connection Pilot Alliance to equalize all conx carriers with equal pas bennies, I'm curious to see if this will ever truly happen. I'm unable to comprehend why front line employees who fly for connection carriers and represent the Delta brand are not given somewhat comparable benefits to mainline in the pass travel department. I know that the same benefits mainline employees recieve are not fully capable of being recieved at conx carriers because we are not flying mainline aircraft, but nonetheless.
I'm also interested in seeing interest on adding a code at the end of our standby priority for those that commute to recieve a higher priority than those using their passes purely for vacation or joyriding. It's a debateable argument, curious as to everyone's thoughts. LOL. Good joke my friend. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:22 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands