Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
Delta Connection equal pass bennies & more >

Delta Connection equal pass bennies & more

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Delta Connection equal pass bennies & more

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-25-2010 | 06:55 PM
  #21  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,143
Likes: 7
From: 737
Default

Originally Posted by nightice
Boarding behind parents and retirees..I never understood why an active employee trying to commute gets bumped by parents and retirees going on a cruise. How and why do Skywest/ASA and Comair get "full benefits"? Why isn't is consistent across the DCI groups? The former 2 are not even wholly-owned. And how much more would it cost to get what the others had pre-merger NWA? I think most would rather pay the $200 maximum per family per year for full benefits.
Pinnacle, and on Jan. 1st, Compass and Mesaba lose all buddy passes. Parents have to travel on High ZED fair, and everyone only get 3 transoceanic travel days per year. Thats 3 one-ways across the ponds. Those are the details as I understood it. But as someone that likes to travel across the pond a lot, this would totally suck. Not sure why they can't pay $200 to get the better deals. I sure would.
Reply
Old 10-26-2010 | 11:26 AM
  #22  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,775
Likes: 18
Default

Originally Posted by bored
At least at XJ, we do have a commuter policy, which is quite good and allows unlimited use. It's written into the FOM, not the contract, so its future under our new mgmt is unknown. That's why writing special commuter clauses into our pass privileges is unnecessary.
I can tell you this... the minute Corp gets around to rewriting manuals, if what you guys have in your FOM isn't in our JCBA, the commuting policy will go the way of your pass benefits... regardless of a later SLI...
Reply
Old 10-26-2010 | 10:38 PM
  #23  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 4,603
Likes: 0
Default

Just a heads up

At ExpressJet we fly at the SAME priority as the CAL employees. Our planes or their planes its the same priority. Flying the same people so why should be nonrev at different priority.

Normal travel is $12.50 one way domestic ($15 if you make a connection). International fees vary by destination. No Annual fee. All normal fee based nonrev passes are unlimited.

Just like them we also get up to 16 "vacation passes" each year depending on dependents. These are one way passes so up to 8 round trips where you get a "super priority" and also fee waived travel regardless of cabin class. Seats open in first from EWR to NRT well if you are using a vacation pass you just got yourself 16 hours in first for free up to 8 round trips this year. Vacation passes are good for 5 years so if you dont use all 16 they roll over. You dont have to use them just for vacation, its just what they are called. You can use them for commuting if you like. For me I will never use one for commuting because they are just to valuable for free international travel.

Here is an example of what a nonrev list might look like. Remember we all travel at the same priority so date of hire is all that matters. CAL or XTT employee doesnt matter.

Hire date Discription
2000 employee on Vacation pass
2001 employee on Vacation pass
2000 dependent traveling alone on Vacation pass
1986 employee on normal pass
1999 employee on normal pass
1965 dependent traveling alone on a normal pass

(dependents travel at the same priority as their respective employee if they are accompanied by said employee)

Jumpseat is different depending on if the flight is ours or theirs. They are OAL on us and we are OAL on them.

Our United pass travel is absolutely horrible as far as priority and cost with no vacation pass at all. It is anyones guess as to what might happen after our merger and the UAL/CAL merger. Our travel bennies are not contractual, although they should be, but we were just lucky and kept what we had from the ole COEX days.

In my opinion, regional airlines shouldnt exist to begin with but at the very least we should get the exact same travel benefits as the mainline employees and nothing less. We fly the same customers. Dont settle for less if you actually get a chance to negotiate for this.
Reply
Old 10-27-2010 | 06:53 AM
  #24  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,127
Likes: 796
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by avi8tor4life
- Some regionals (ie SKW) will stand up for their employees because they rely on a certain amount of labor goodwill. Since it doesn't cost them much or anything to stand up to DL, they will do that.


Really?! Standup for us?! What have you been smoking. If they wanted a little goodwill they'd have kept the health insurance options instead of forcing the HSA on everyone. SkyWest will do what SkyWest wants regardless of what goodwill may be lost by labor. They don't care anymore.
They rely on goodwill to keep unions out. I think that has become a lower priority, but they would still like to hold the line. Healthcare of course is major goodwill (or badwill) issue, but it costs money.

It doesn't cost SKW money to stand up to DL when DL comes looking to bump us on our own airplanes. SKW is not negotiating new contracts with DL right now so it's not a big deal.

DL might be able to get FREE employee goodwill by giving them higher priority on DCI/SKW...so they will ask.

SKW can get FREE employee goodwill (or at least avoid more badwill) by telling DL to pound sand. Doesn't cost anything to say "No".
Reply
Old 10-27-2010 | 07:37 PM
  #25  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 5,585
Likes: 328
Default

Originally Posted by bored
Cencal... we at XJ are fully prepared for the butt kicking in QOL we will take when Corp. starts making changes at the new XJ. Remember, we didn't ask for this. It is what it is and we are prepared for a fight. This is why it's so important we come together and try for the best possible outcome with one JCBA and one fair SLI.

As for "call in honest." Well... I realize anything in the FOM is up for removal at a whim, it is sort of in the companies best interest to offer a commuter policy. I think that's why XJ has it. It works for both parties. But, we all know what road PCL mgmt takes when something could possibly benefit an employee. Perhaps moving the XJ "call in honest" policy into the JCBA is the way to go. I still don't believe that a special boarding priority for commuters is the right way to handle the situation.
The NWA call-in-honest policy was removed with the merger with Delta. What makes you think a regionals' call-in-honest policy is going to stick?
Reply
Old 10-28-2010 | 01:26 AM
  #26  
Justdoinmyjob's Avatar
Looking for a laugh
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 4,099
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by hockeypilot44
The NWA call-in-honest policy was removed with the merger with Delta. What makes you think a regionals' call-in-honest policy is going to stick?
No, actually the Delta call in honest policy was chosen over the NWA one.The NWA policy was a better one though.
Reply
Old 10-28-2010 | 05:20 AM
  #27  
TonyWilliams's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,048
Likes: 0
From: Self employed
Default

Originally Posted by Captain Tony

By the way, I'm LOVING flying the 700 and 900 in Memphis, but I wish you'd get your little broken down 200 out of the way so I don't have to slow to 250 200 miles out, because I prefer cruising on in at .82.

The "little" 200 actually cruises faster in RVSM than the 7 and 9.

I've deleted most of the mud slinging in this thread, I hope.
Reply
Old 10-29-2010 | 05:15 AM
  #28  
Captain Tony's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,967
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by TonyWilliams
The "little" 200 actually cruises faster in RVSM than the 7 and 9.
You mean it "could" cruise faster. I've never had a -200 above .78 in level flight. And anything above ISA+0 it's .74 or less. The -700 will do .82 (limited to .83 in RVSM) and the -900 will do .85 (limited to .82 in RVSM) in level flight at any ISA.

Not bragging, just making sure the facts are straight.
Reply
Old 10-31-2010 | 03:17 PM
  #29  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 900
Likes: 0
From: A320 FO
Default

You're not getting slowed because we're randomly deciding to slow down. I haven't had a day in a while that MEM center hasn't slowed me down while I was still on the arrival. Flow control into MEM used to be unheard of, now we're seeing it pretty often on short hops from FSM, XNA and some of the other shorter leg length stations. Oh, and I'll be a bit more concerned about flying faster to get there on-time when the company is concerned about getting us a decent contract. Until then, as long as the passengers are gonna make their connections (which how the banks are constructed in MEM, you can be pretty late and still see people make their connections), I really couldn't care less about what time we're gonna get to the gate.

Now, on the pass benefits, I'm still wanting "fly confirmed for less" back. Loved that with NWA, and as soon as Delta handed down the "DCI contract carrier" package, that was one of the first things gone. I LIKED being able to buy a severely discounted POSITIVE SPACE ticket for my wife and kid to go on vacation. FedEx works great for me, but I can't take my family with me. With the loads how they have been for about the past year, it's touch and go if I'd be able to take them with me on space available travel anyway, especially with the newly hired ramper from Delta taking his mom bumping us off....
Reply
Old 11-03-2010 | 12:55 AM
  #30  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by djrogs03
There has been talk with the Delta Connection Pilot Alliance to equalize all conx carriers with equal pas bennies, I'm curious to see if this will ever truly happen. I'm unable to comprehend why front line employees who fly for connection carriers and represent the Delta brand are not given somewhat comparable benefits to mainline in the pass travel department. I know that the same benefits mainline employees recieve are not fully capable of being recieved at conx carriers because we are not flying mainline aircraft, but nonetheless.

I'm also interested in seeing interest on adding a code at the end of our standby priority for those that commute to recieve a higher priority than those using their passes purely for vacation or joyriding. It's a debateable argument, curious as to everyone's thoughts.

LOL. Good joke my friend.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Ferd149
Mergers and Acquisitions
117
11-08-2023 07:41 AM
PinnacleFO
Regional
53
12-13-2010 12:04 PM
Babur
Regional
158
09-15-2009 07:14 AM
ksatflyer
Hangar Talk
10
08-20-2008 09:14 PM
Jetjock65
Regional
59
03-19-2008 04:30 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices