EAS cuts could ground rural communities
03-30-2011 | 07:37 AM
#1
Thread Starter
Line Holder
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
EAS cuts could ground rural communities
Last edited by rickair7777; 03-30-2011 at 09:31 AM. Reason: Make Title Fit
03-30-2011 | 07:49 AM
#2
Prime Minister/Moderator
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,130
Likes: 796
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
The common scenario of an entire ground ops team plus 8 full-time TSA's standing around all day to handle three (3) pax ovre the course of the day really is pushing the envelope of fraud, waste, and abuse.
Maybe they don't need to cut it entirely, but they should certainly weed out those destinations which have negligible traffic.
Maybe they don't need to cut it entirely, but they should certainly weed out those destinations which have negligible traffic.
03-30-2011 | 08:23 AM
#5
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,258
Likes: 0
Seeing as how I fly for an airline that does several of these routes ... I can say that some of them are worth it, while others' aren't. I can't count the number of times I've flown to VCT, PQI, PKB, AOO, SHD, etc. with 2-3 pax on just one leg. Pretty sure I've done it w/o any pax a number of times as well. Most of these cities are a solid 2 hr drive (there are some exceptions to this of course) from any city with scheduled air service .. so it would be a pain to make that drive when you need to go somewhere ... but at the same time how often do people that live there actually have to travel??
03-30-2011 | 08:39 AM
#6
Line Holder
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 595
Likes: 2
Alaska as a state is the third biggest welfare queen in the country, they get $1.84 in federal spending per dollar of federal taxes. Plus they have their own oil money. (The Tax Foundation - Federal Spending Received Per Dollar of Taxes Paid by State, 2005)
Not to thread hijack but when I looked up this list I couldn't help but notice that the top 10 federal 'welfare' states are all red states... kinda ironic.
03-30-2011 | 02:07 PM
#8
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,792
Likes: 0
From: Doing what you do, for less.
I think EAS should stick around, but frequency, aircraft size, and cities should be cut.
Provide a subsidy that allows for twice daily service in something the size of a Caravan. The airline wants to run something bigger, they're going to have to pay for the difference themselves. If these routes usually only have 2-3 pax, the government shouldn't be subsidizing an aircraft that seats many times that amount.
Making a distance rule. No EAS to any airport which is within 2 hours driving distance from an airport served by scheduled pax flights.
Other than that, for some airports, EAS is just that... essential, and we shouldn't cut it entirely.
Provide a subsidy that allows for twice daily service in something the size of a Caravan. The airline wants to run something bigger, they're going to have to pay for the difference themselves. If these routes usually only have 2-3 pax, the government shouldn't be subsidizing an aircraft that seats many times that amount.
Making a distance rule. No EAS to any airport which is within 2 hours driving distance from an airport served by scheduled pax flights.
Other than that, for some airports, EAS is just that... essential, and we shouldn't cut it entirely.
03-30-2011 | 02:45 PM
#9
Line Holder
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,755
Likes: 6
The common scenario of an entire ground ops team plus 8 full-time TSA's standing around all day to handle three (3) pax ovre the course of the day really is pushing the envelope of fraud, waste, and abuse.
Maybe they don't need to cut it entirely, but they should certainly weed out those destinations which have negligible traffic.
Maybe they don't need to cut it entirely, but they should certainly weed out those destinations which have negligible traffic.
I agree with your assessment of the situation. I have flown in and out of Greenville, MS a few years ago. There were two scheduled flights per day for a total of 62 seats per day. For this there was an operational tower and a TSA crew, in addition to whatever it costs to keep the airport open.
EAS must go unless it is truly 'Essential'. It almost never is.
03-30-2011 | 02:48 PM
#10
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,048
Likes: 0
From: Self employed
This EAS stuff is political trading points. Doubtful it will go away. Disguised as something else, maybe. But there's too many dollars / votes being poured into some of the micro communities that any politician can say, "Look what I got fer ya... vote for me!".
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
