Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

D-Day: 9E, XJ, 9L SLI

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-27-2011 | 05:13 PM
  #271  
Aldous Snow's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by higney85
The PCL merger committee has been tasked with a single job- protect 9E pilots' seniority. The fact that everyone seems the most livid about it would indicate they are indeed doing that. Not a jab, but look at it from another perspective.
Good point, but perhaps look at it from this angle. The XJ proposal did not have a clear winner, nor did the CJC proposal, and here is what I was led to believe was the reason why...
According to our negotiation team...it would be a true statement to say that before SLI negotiations took place, everyone agreed to make a fair plan, one that would not have a clear winner. Draw your own conclusions from there.
Old 05-27-2011 | 05:14 PM
  #272  
higney85's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,616
Likes: 8
From: Bus driver
Default

Originally Posted by gojo
I disagree with your thoughts on fair and equitable. Equitable for only one group cancels out fair. This is supposed to be fair and eqitable for all three groups. The whole idea is to find a solution that everyone can live with. The all or nothing attitude may be looking out for Pinnacle pilots, but it sends out bad messages to the other two groups. I feel that your MEC is pouring fuel on an already hot fire by essentially saying they don't want things to be fair and equitable for everyone. In the end I hope that this anger doesn't make it to the flight deck
I think in the end our combined group will still have the 5%. It always will. "fair and equitable" is in the eyes of the beholder. That's the entire psycological premise behind this 20+ pages. What 1 thinks is fair, 2 do not. What 1 thinks is equitable, 2 do not. For that very reason we all entrust in Bloch. His only job is to create a method of "fair and equitable" and populate it with our pre-existing list that was totally based on the seniority system. We could be the best of friends, or worst of enemies- that won't change bloch's job or mindset. He is the "neutral" and theoretically the only one who is entirely unaffected by the outcome. Why he has had all info since tuesday and it's not out is beyond me. Hopefully this is resolved soon, everyone is ready to see the list and move on. The only smiling face will be the #1 guy. The rest if us will have a different view of "fair and equitable" but will move on just like Delta. We can only fear a Usair/America west situation, but I think between merger policy and learning from the past this shouldn't be the case.
Old 05-27-2011 | 05:34 PM
  #273  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 2,648
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by higney85
I think in the end our combined group will still have the 5%. It always will. "fair and equitable" is in the eyes of the beholder. That's the entire psycological premise behind this 20+ pages. What 1 thinks is fair, 2 do not. What 1 thinks is equitable, 2 do not. For that very reason we all entrust in Bloch. His only job is to create a method of "fair and equitable" and populate it with our pre-existing list that was totally based on the seniority system. We could be the best of friends, or worst of enemies- that won't change bloch's job or mindset. He is the "neutral" and theoretically the only one who is entirely unaffected by the outcome. Why he has had all info since tuesday and it's not out is beyond me. Hopefully this is resolved soon, everyone is ready to see the list and move on. The only smiling face will be the #1 guy. The rest if us will have a different view of "fair and equitable" but will move on just like Delta. We can only fear a Usair/America west situation, but I think between merger policy and learning from the past this shouldn't be the case.
Well then why the H$ll did we waist 3 months negotiating together if there was never any intent to try to find a fair and equitable sotution for all three groups? Seems to me we should have just turned it ovr to Bloch right away. To me the word negotiating means back and forth proposals, listening to each others needs and ideas and try to find a solution that works for everyone. What your saying is that the Pinnacle group was unwilling to do this, that it was only what was best for them and no one else. I suspect it was this attitude that kept you in contract negotiations for so long.
Old 05-27-2011 | 05:38 PM
  #274  
Line Holder
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
From: DL new hire
Default

Originally Posted by higney85
I think in the end our combined group will still have the 5%. It always will. "fair and equitable" is in the eyes of the beholder. That's the entire psycological premise behind this 20+ pages. What 1 thinks is fair, 2 do not. What 1 thinks is equitable, 2 do not. For that very reason we all entrust in Bloch. His only job is to create a method of "fair and equitable" and populate it with our pre-existing list that was totally based on the seniority system. We could be the best of friends, or worst of enemies- that won't change bloch's job or mindset. He is the "neutral" and theoretically the only one who is entirely unaffected by the outcome. Why he has had all info since tuesday and it's not out is beyond me. Hopefully this is resolved soon, everyone is ready to see the list and move on. The only smiling face will be the #1 guy. The rest if us will have a different view of "fair and equitable" but will move on just like Delta. We can only fear a Usair/America west situation, but I think between merger policy and learning from the past this shouldn't be the case.

Higney, (or is it "Mr. Higney)...if this is in fact the case then the SLI is a fairly simple mathematical problem...Bloch gets the 3 lists, solves for "X" and bam! the integration is complete, assumably by DOH since that would be the most straightforward solution to be "totally based on the seniority system" as you assert...so then, why all the hoopla on 3 forums, countless crew buses, hotel vans, crew rooms, and flight decks across the system? Just asking...I don't care what the list looks like or when it comes out...it's like reality TV to me...I just want it to be over so we can all move on...
Old 05-27-2011 | 05:59 PM
  #275  
Roll’n Thunder
Community Influencer
15 Years
On Reserve
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 5,157
Likes: 568
From: Pilot
Default

Originally Posted by Aldous Snow
Good point, but perhaps look at it from this angle. The XJ proposal did not have a clear winner, nor did the CJC proposal, and here is what I was led to believe was the reason why...
According to our negotiation team...it would be a true statement to say that before SLI negotiations took place, everyone agreed to make a fair plan, one that would not have a clear winner. Draw your own conclusions from there.
No offense, but in my view the Colgan proposal had a clear winner - Colgan pilots. Based on relative seniority you would have a lot of Colgan guys moving ahead of people with several more years experience at the other airlines.

The Mesaba proposal was a win for the senior Mesaba pilots while a big loss for junior Mesaba guys and colgan. Pinnacle would probably have been close to a wash.

Pinnacle's proposal was a win for pinnacle and Mesaba at the expense of Colgan.

All three proposals were based on some level of logic and a core principle (DOH, relative, or category class). Each proposal has elements that could be considered fair or unfair depending on your point of view.

People also seem to forget that this was also just the last and final proposals. What else was proposed or negotiated during the other 2-3 months? I sure don't know. Maybe it was good, maybe it was bad, but all we have right now is a snapshot of the very end of the process. The road to get there, at least for now, is only known by a select few and they aren't sharing the info.
Old 05-27-2011 | 06:18 PM
  #276  
FlyJSH's Avatar
Day puke
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,865
Likes: 0
From: Out.
Default

Originally Posted by higney85
"fair and equitable" is in the eyes of the beholder. That's the entire psycological premise behind this 20+ pages. What 1 thinks is fair, 2 do not. What 1 thinks is equitable, 2 do not. .

My guess is most reasonable folks expected their committee to submit an initial proposal something like 50/25/25, hoped for 40/30/30 deal, and figured something like 33/34/32 would be the result. Messaba and Colgan both started with their own 50/25/25 plans. Pinnacle started with a 90/6/4.
Old 05-27-2011 | 06:52 PM
  #277  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
Default

I am not a naysayer, but in hindsight what is happening now with the SLI should have been predictable. Knowing what I know now, I would have NEVER have supported a single-list contract, taken my chances with doing our own negotiations and if PNCL Corp decided to do any whipsawing it would have been better to deal with it IF that ever occurred. I really am very disappointed in the way this entire merger/SLI has been handled by ALPA. Yes, I have a payraise, an increase in per diem, etc...But, I don't think it would have been too long before we'd have had the same contract or something close to it. PNCL Corp. knows that the future of the company is NOT vested on the large, uneconomical and aging CRJ-200 fleet, but on the Q-400 and CRJ-900. That is why they bought Colgan and Mesaba. I really don't feel any animosity toward anyone that flies at Pinnacle. If circumstances were different, I likely could be there now myself. However, from a Colgan pilot point of view...Pinnacle's MEC is being greedy, self-serving and not looking out for the future of ALL the pilots of ALL three companies.
Old 05-27-2011 | 08:02 PM
  #278  
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 353
Likes: 0
From: MSP CA
Default

Originally Posted by BE19Pilot
.Pinnacle's MEC is being greedy, self-serving and not looking out for the future of ALL the pilots of ALL three companies.
You think Pinnacle's MEC is being greedy, I think 9L's MEC is being greedy!! Its outrageous to think that your MEC would even consider RELATIVE integration...
Old 05-27-2011 | 09:21 PM
  #279  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by CAPTAINPCL
You think Pinnacle's MEC is being greedy, I think 9L's MEC is being greedy!! Its outrageous to think that your MEC would even consider RELATIVE integration...
Well played sir...Obviously, each merger committee is going to try and get the most that they can out of one of these deals or they aren't doing their jobs. However, I think Pinnacle's solution was more unrealistic and would have created far more problems within our pilot groups than it would have solved. Everyone knows, understands and respects the long battle you have had with PNCL mgt. to get your contact amended. Everyone also knows about the infighting that took place during the last vote for a TA over the signing bonus. Based on this last-second maneuvering that is going on, frankly I really don't who to really trust to give me the straight story...
Old 05-27-2011 | 09:34 PM
  #280  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 2,648
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by CAPTAINPCL
You think Pinnacle's MEC is being greedy, I think 9L's MEC is being greedy!! Its outrageous to think that your MEC would even consider RELATIVE integration...
As Higney said in an earlier post, they were only looking out for th best interests of their pilots, and by doing so it appeared that they gave two $hits for the rest. They are so afraid of having the pilot group mad at them they made it impossible to reason with at these negotiations, and therefore forcing Bloch to make the decision. Poor union leadership at its finest, and I don't mean leadership literally.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
meloveboeing
Regional
5
10-02-2010 07:47 AM
kc135driver
United
122
08-24-2010 08:30 AM
UAL T38 Phlyer
Military
4
05-25-2009 10:23 AM
exerauflyboy5
Flight Schools and Training
15
02-18-2009 08:29 PM
Busdriver
JetBlue
70
01-16-2006 10:32 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices