D-Day: 9E, XJ, 9L SLI
#271
According to our negotiation team...it would be a true statement to say that before SLI negotiations took place, everyone agreed to make a fair plan, one that would not have a clear winner. Draw your own conclusions from there.
#272
I disagree with your thoughts on fair and equitable. Equitable for only one group cancels out fair. This is supposed to be fair and eqitable for all three groups. The whole idea is to find a solution that everyone can live with. The all or nothing attitude may be looking out for Pinnacle pilots, but it sends out bad messages to the other two groups. I feel that your MEC is pouring fuel on an already hot fire by essentially saying they don't want things to be fair and equitable for everyone. In the end I hope that this anger doesn't make it to the flight deck
#273
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 2,648
Likes: 0
I think in the end our combined group will still have the 5%. It always will. "fair and equitable" is in the eyes of the beholder. That's the entire psycological premise behind this 20+ pages. What 1 thinks is fair, 2 do not. What 1 thinks is equitable, 2 do not. For that very reason we all entrust in Bloch. His only job is to create a method of "fair and equitable" and populate it with our pre-existing list that was totally based on the seniority system. We could be the best of friends, or worst of enemies- that won't change bloch's job or mindset. He is the "neutral" and theoretically the only one who is entirely unaffected by the outcome. Why he has had all info since tuesday and it's not out is beyond me. Hopefully this is resolved soon, everyone is ready to see the list and move on. The only smiling face will be the #1 guy. The rest if us will have a different view of "fair and equitable" but will move on just like Delta. We can only fear a Usair/America west situation, but I think between merger policy and learning from the past this shouldn't be the case.
#274
Line Holder
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
From: DL new hire
I think in the end our combined group will still have the 5%. It always will. "fair and equitable" is in the eyes of the beholder. That's the entire psycological premise behind this 20+ pages. What 1 thinks is fair, 2 do not. What 1 thinks is equitable, 2 do not. For that very reason we all entrust in Bloch. His only job is to create a method of "fair and equitable" and populate it with our pre-existing list that was totally based on the seniority system. We could be the best of friends, or worst of enemies- that won't change bloch's job or mindset. He is the "neutral" and theoretically the only one who is entirely unaffected by the outcome. Why he has had all info since tuesday and it's not out is beyond me. Hopefully this is resolved soon, everyone is ready to see the list and move on. The only smiling face will be the #1 guy. The rest if us will have a different view of "fair and equitable" but will move on just like Delta. We can only fear a Usair/America west situation, but I think between merger policy and learning from the past this shouldn't be the case.
Higney, (or is it "Mr. Higney)...if this is in fact the case then the SLI is a fairly simple mathematical problem...Bloch gets the 3 lists, solves for "X" and bam! the integration is complete, assumably by DOH since that would be the most straightforward solution to be "totally based on the seniority system" as you assert...so then, why all the hoopla on 3 forums, countless crew buses, hotel vans, crew rooms, and flight decks across the system? Just asking...I don't care what the list looks like or when it comes out...it's like reality TV to me...I just want it to be over so we can all move on...
#275
Roll’n Thunder
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 5,157
Likes: 568
From: Pilot
Good point, but perhaps look at it from this angle. The XJ proposal did not have a clear winner, nor did the CJC proposal, and here is what I was led to believe was the reason why...
According to our negotiation team...it would be a true statement to say that before SLI negotiations took place, everyone agreed to make a fair plan, one that would not have a clear winner. Draw your own conclusions from there.
According to our negotiation team...it would be a true statement to say that before SLI negotiations took place, everyone agreed to make a fair plan, one that would not have a clear winner. Draw your own conclusions from there.
The Mesaba proposal was a win for the senior Mesaba pilots while a big loss for junior Mesaba guys and colgan. Pinnacle would probably have been close to a wash.
Pinnacle's proposal was a win for pinnacle and Mesaba at the expense of Colgan.
All three proposals were based on some level of logic and a core principle (DOH, relative, or category class). Each proposal has elements that could be considered fair or unfair depending on your point of view.
People also seem to forget that this was also just the last and final proposals. What else was proposed or negotiated during the other 2-3 months? I sure don't know. Maybe it was good, maybe it was bad, but all we have right now is a snapshot of the very end of the process. The road to get there, at least for now, is only known by a select few and they aren't sharing the info.
#276
My guess is most reasonable folks expected their committee to submit an initial proposal something like 50/25/25, hoped for 40/30/30 deal, and figured something like 33/34/32 would be the result. Messaba and Colgan both started with their own 50/25/25 plans. Pinnacle started with a 90/6/4.
#277
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
I am not a naysayer, but in hindsight what is happening now with the SLI should have been predictable. Knowing what I know now, I would have NEVER have supported a single-list contract, taken my chances with doing our own negotiations and if PNCL Corp decided to do any whipsawing it would have been better to deal with it IF that ever occurred. I really am very disappointed in the way this entire merger/SLI has been handled by ALPA. Yes, I have a payraise, an increase in per diem, etc...But, I don't think it would have been too long before we'd have had the same contract or something close to it. PNCL Corp. knows that the future of the company is NOT vested on the large, uneconomical and aging CRJ-200 fleet, but on the Q-400 and CRJ-900. That is why they bought Colgan and Mesaba. I really don't feel any animosity toward anyone that flies at Pinnacle. If circumstances were different, I likely could be there now myself. However, from a Colgan pilot point of view...Pinnacle's MEC is being greedy, self-serving and not looking out for the future of ALL the pilots of ALL three companies.
#278
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 353
Likes: 0
From: MSP CA
#279
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
Well played sir...Obviously, each merger committee is going to try and get the most that they can out of one of these deals or they aren't doing their jobs. However, I think Pinnacle's solution was more unrealistic and would have created far more problems within our pilot groups than it would have solved. Everyone knows, understands and respects the long battle you have had with PNCL mgt. to get your contact amended. Everyone also knows about the infighting that took place during the last vote for a TA over the signing bonus. Based on this last-second maneuvering that is going on, frankly I really don't who to really trust to give me the straight story...
#280
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 2,648
Likes: 0
As Higney said in an earlier post, they were only looking out for th best interests of their pilots, and by doing so it appeared that they gave two $hits for the rest. They are so afraid of having the pilot group mad at them they made it impossible to reason with at these negotiations, and therefore forcing Bloch to make the decision. Poor union leadership at its finest, and I don't mean leadership literally.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



