![]() |
Personally, I would wait until you can hold a line on a specific piece of equipment before bidding it. The ATL commute is really difficult.
|
Originally Posted by MunkyButtr
(Post 1030281)
New hires will probably be able to get ATL for a while to come. Why they would want that outside of QOL is beyond me. It'll take forever to get off reserve and would be a nightmare commute. The new contract has 12 month position locks. Why would anyone with the senority close to upgrade take a vacancy in ATL for a $2 raise to be locked for a year. Like he said though, depends how the vacancies turn out. I think I'm seeing new hires going to ATL on that last 9E vacancies. Have fun on reserve for eternity though....
there is no seat lock going from 900 to the 200 |
Originally Posted by Farmlover
(Post 1030540)
there is no seat lock going from 900 to the 200
|
Originally Posted by Farmlover
(Post 1030540)
there is no seat lock going from 900 to the 200
read the awesome contract we have. 12 month position lock, cannot upgrade out of a seat for 12 months when you switch airplanes. |
Originally Posted by airborne42
(Post 1000482)
thanks guys.
what about mesaba though? are they also actively hiring and how many? because I noticed they have lower flight time requirements. which base would be the most likely one if I were to get on with mesaba? and I'm a little confused as to how mesaba and pinnacle are different when it comes to work rules or QOL etc. and if they aren't much different, then how come their hiring minimums are? |
Originally Posted by MunkyButtr
(Post 1030621)
read the awesome contract we have. 12 month position lock, cannot upgrade out of a seat for 12 months when you switch airplanes.
|
Originally Posted by MunkyButtr
(Post 1030621)
read the awesome contract we have. 12 month position lock, cannot upgrade out of a seat for 12 months when you switch airplanes.
6. A freeze will not be imposed in conjunction with Differences Training. So moving from 200 to 900 is no freeze. ** WARNING DO NOT LISTEN TO HEARSAY FROM SOMEONE WHO "Read the contract"** if it's the truth they can show you where it is. Look at it yourself. Then you'll be sure. |
On a related sidenote to your attitude towards the contract Munkybutter, I agree there a parts that could have been better. And there are loopholes that Mesaba never exploited that Pinnacle will, but our job is to make sure it's enforced to the fullest extent we can and that everyone reads it. So is it awesome? No. Is it better than what we had before? Depends. But at least it ends the whipsaw and allows you full access to the flying your labors paid for.
|
Originally Posted by Blueskies21
(Post 1030885)
On a related sidenote to your attitude towards the contract Munkybutter, I agree there a parts that could have been better. And there are loopholes that Mesaba never exploited that Pinnacle will, but our job is to make sure it's enforced to the fullest extent we can and that everyone reads it. So is it awesome? No. Is it better than what we had before? Depends. But at least it ends the whipsaw and allows you full access to the flying your labors paid for.
You slay me! |
Originally Posted by Blueskies21
(Post 1030879)
I suggest you read the awesome contract you have. I'll save you a little bit of time. It's on page 163 of the pdf version available on the website. Section 24.G.6
6. A freeze will not be imposed in conjunction with Differences Training. So moving from 200 to 900 is no freeze. ** WARNING DO NOT LISTEN TO HEARSAY FROM SOMEONE WHO "Read the contract"** if it's the truth they can show you where it is. Look at it yourself. Then you'll be sure. |
Sorry to come across so bad,I didn't really mean to jump on you personally there's just a lot of misinformation out there. It's likely that various people in the union or company believe there IS a freeze in conjunction with 200 to 900 and I myself wasn't sure prior to looking it up however as you can see the language is VERY clear. I just want the company to abide by what they agreed to and the easiest way to assure that is if we all know what they agreed to.
|
Originally Posted by Blueskies21
(Post 1031302)
Sorry to come across so bad,I didn't really mean to jump on you personally there's just a lot of misinformation out there. It's likely that various people in the union or company believe there IS a freeze in conjunction with 200 to 900 and I myself wasn't sure prior to looking it up however as you can see the language is VERY clear. I just want the company to abide by what they agreed to and the easiest way to assure that is if we all know what they agreed to.
|
yes you can go to the 900, then the 200- guys have already done this. Its black and white in the contract so if it was me i would jump all over it
:) |
Originally Posted by Farmlover
(Post 1031327)
yes you can go to the 900, then the 200- guys have already done this. Its black and white in the contract so if it was me i would jump all over it
:) Copied from somewhere else: Section 24.G.6. states that a freeze will not be imposed in conjunction with Differences Training. However, Section 24.G.3. (applicable to F/O’s) and 24.G.4. (applicable to Captains) both include language that the Company may argue places some restriction on a pilot’s ability to freely bid back and forth between the 200 and the 900. |
Originally Posted by Al Czervik
(Post 1031330)
Careful...
Copied from somewhere else: Section 24.G.6. states that a freeze will not be imposed in conjunction with Differences Training. However, Section 24.G.3. (applicable to F/O’s) and 24.G.4. (applicable to Captains) both include language that the Company may argue places some restriction on a pilot’s ability to freely bid back and forth between the 200 and the 900. |
Originally Posted by higney85
(Post 1031352)
I have been given a 2 sided answer. I'm remaining quiet since it doesn't impact me and I don't have a final answer. Talk to a rep when the next vacancy comes out.
I hear multi-class bid with DTW and MEM SF340 going away at the same time. |
Originally Posted by Bartok
(Post 1031410)
The next Vacancy should be very interesting.
I hear multi-class bid with DTW and MEM SF340 going away at the same time. |
Originally Posted by Av8tion
(Post 1031435)
Any idea when it's comming out?
|
My sources say next week... As in beginning of August.. It will be very interesting. If I get bumped out of DTW I will be a very unpleasant person to be around. That commute is rough enough as it stands.
|
Originally Posted by higney85
(Post 1031446)
My sources say next week... As in beginning of August.. It will be very interesting. If I get bumped out of DTW I will be a very unpleasant person to be around. That commute is rough enough as it stands.
|
Originally Posted by Bartok
(Post 1031452)
They could open up more -200 Captain vacancies along with the displacement of the Saab pilots, this could help you.
|
Originally Posted by higney85
(Post 1031460)
The chips will fall where they fall. I have been rather "upbeat" by the future possibilities, but if I (as a 9E guy) get bumped out of my seat/base by XJ guys off the Saab it's going to be quite a personal battle to hold my thoughts. Looking at the staffing everyone should be able to be absorbed, but that doesn't mean anything because it makes sense.
I have my own demons with this thing. As a 10 year XJ guy, I bid the same as someone at 680 on 9E's old seniority list after the SLI. |
Originally Posted by Bartok
(Post 1031468)
I don't know what to tell you.
I have my own demons with this thing. As a 10 year XJ guy, I bid the same as someone at 680 on 9E's old seniority list after the SLI. |
Originally Posted by Bartok
(Post 1031410)
The next Vacancy should be very interesting.
I hear multi-class bid with DTW and MEM SF340 going away at the same time. |
Originally Posted by higney85
(Post 1031471)
You would be just above me then. Everyone is mad, I guess that makes it "OK".
Yeah, I feel ok. |
Originally Posted by Avroman
(Post 1031562)
I hope not, that would ruin my plans to bid a Saab CA/FO seat and wait this mess out longer while in training keeping my 900 pay.
I have also heard the vacancy will have openings for SF340 for Colgan Saabs. These positions should be outside the fenced slots allowing anyone to bid them. |
A friend of mine just pointed out that my above post was wrong. He says that 9E cannot bid Saab captain even if the numbers are above the fenced positions. I did not know this so I looked it up.
For a period of five years beginning with the submission of the Integrated Seniority List, no Pinnacle pilot may be awarded or displaced to a Saab-340 captain position, and no pre-merger Colgan pilot may be awarded or displaced to a Saab-340 captain position unless Mesaba pilots maintain 129 Saab-340 captains. For a period of five years beginning with submission of the integrated seniority list, no pre-merger Pinnacle or Mesaba pilots may be awarded or displaced to a Q-400 captain unless Colgan pilots maintain 193 Q-400 captain positions. |
Originally Posted by Bartok
(Post 1031598)
SF340 in MSP until dec, or LGA until the spring.
I have also heard the vacancy will have openings for SF340 for Colgan Saabs. These positions should be outside the fenced slots allowing anyone to bid them. |
Originally Posted by MunkyButtr
(Post 1031707)
Gonna be a bloch party.
With current staffing levels... how many of the fences are actually in force right now? I know the Q400 one will be in place a VERY long time, but I'm curious about some of the other ones... |
What can Saab new hires expect for jr bases? Dtw? I'm asking due to the post in "hiring News" stating most pinnacle new hires will be going to the Saab.
|
Originally Posted by Flyguy01
(Post 1033426)
What can Saab new hires expect for jr bases? Dtw? I'm asking due to the post in "hiring News" stating most pinnacle new hires will be going to the Saab.
|
Originally Posted by Flyguy01
(Post 1033426)
What can Saab new hires expect for jr bases? Dtw? I'm asking due to the post in "hiring News" stating most pinnacle new hires will be going to the Saab.
|
Ok thanks. Looks like I missed my chance to sit reserve in dtw.
|
Originally Posted by Flyguy01
(Post 1033497)
Ok thanks. Looks like I missed my chance to sit reserve in dtw.
|
Anyone have any juice on the next vacancy? I'm getting a Bueller flashback.... Higney?
|
Originally Posted by MunkyButtr
(Post 1034477)
Anyone have any juice on the next vacancy? I'm getting a Bueller flashback.... Higney?
ATL CR9 +10 CA MSP CR9 +2 FO MSP CR2 +2 CA +6 FO DTW CR2 +10 CA +2 FO IAH DH4 +4 FO IAD SF3 +2 CA IAH SF3 +2 CA +10 FO MEM SF3 -21 CA -23 FO |
Originally Posted by Av8tion
(Post 1034575)
5 more upgrades... MEM SF3 is gone... enjoy...
ATL CR9 +10 CA MSP CR9 +2 FO MSP CR2 +2 CA +6 FO DTW CR2 +10 CA +2 FO IAH DH4 +4 FO IAD SF3 +2 CA IAH SF3 +2 CA +10 FO MEM SF3 -21 CA -23 FO |
Any news on new hire class for spt?
|
Originally Posted by Boeingfan
(Post 1039959)
Any news on new hire class for spt?
|
Well its about to close boys and girls... one more day and we will see what madness it will bring. Surely there will be lots of secondary displacements.... I don't buy the argument that "the company will absorb secondaries" I could see them absorbing 10 or 20 but not 44... This is only the beginning though... MSP has some 80 saab pilots and Detroit has quite a few too... can't wait to see how fences will play into this.
Oh and for the OP... you might try pinnacolabapilots.com ... its a forum for pinnacle corp pilots someone started. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:07 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands