![]() |
Originally Posted by Mason32
(Post 1025665)
What is your date of hire at Dunkin Donuts, or anywhere?
It's the first date you are being paid for your labor.... which in this case woud be when you show up for class. |
Originally Posted by eaglefly
(Post 1025828)
Look for all AA feeders to be able to fly more mixed-class CRJ-700's. The feeder system will be likely smaller overall, but will have more 70-seaters and Q400's likely as well. There WILL be scope changes that allow it, but overall AA pilots will come out better and move the ball back down the field in the right direction.
The shareholders will do OK as Eagle shares will still be viable and Eagle's costs will plummet due to whipsawing. Eagle wont be taking over AA's domestic market and will even lose a lot of what they previously gained. |
Originally Posted by SATCFI
(Post 1025604)
The only problem with what you saying is that you only inculde the aircraft. The "flight ops" or the entire group of "assets" include, Aircraft, gates, or routes operated by Eagle in the previous 12 months. The only way a new carrier can take a "market, or route" is if Eagle stopped flying completely in a market or route for 12 months..
I should add that the CPA that American Eagle gets with American will define the "scope" of the agreement. Unfortunately, the pilots will have no say in this. |
Originally Posted by ingleburg5
(Post 1026057)
I see what you are saying, but the issue arises that you (assuming the divesture occurs...if it does not this is void) would no longer be employed by American Airlines, so your contract would be with American Eagle and not American Airlines. Scope is not something that can be easily forced upon another entity. Your scope would protect you from things American Eagle might do, but it would be a lot harder to have a judge enforce your scope with American. The waters get pretty muddy, and I can ensure you that their lawyers have already looked into the details.
I should add that the CPA that American Eagle gets with American will define the "scope" of the agreement. Unfortunately, the pilots will have no say in this. everything we are all saying is pie in the sky. truth is we have no clue, and you are correct AA will not be giving us anything they don't want to give. They don't care what happens to us. This deal is all about what they want, and they will work it for their interest, and their interest only. |
Originally Posted by SATCFI
(Post 1026079)
everything we are all saying is pie in the sky. truth is we have no clue, and you are correct AA will not be giving us anything they don't want to give. They don't care what happens to us. This deal is all about what they want, and they will work it for their interest, and their interest only.
|
Originally Posted by Mason32
(Post 1025671)
Do you really think the CEO's that did this would split the stock shares, then watch as those shares became worthless? The Board of Directors would fire them the next day.
Stop thinking about it as a laborer... they have a duty to their shareholders, and wiping out share value is career suicide. And just to play devil's advocate, it does seem convenient for AA to position themselves to take ownership of the A/C, absorb the pilots, and then liquidate whatever is left. This would give them a staffing advantage pending the new rest rules being released. Every other carrier will be scrambling for pilots, and I think we can all agree that the pool is beginning to dry up. If AA has a larger pool all to themselves, they can adapt quickly. |
Originally Posted by boiler07
And just to play devil's advocate, it does seem convenient for AA to position themselves to take ownership of the A/C, absorb the pilots, and then liquidate whatever is left. This would give them a staffing advantage pending the new rest rules being released. Every other carrier will be scrambling for pilots, and I think we can all agree that the pool is beginning to dry up. If AA has a larger pool all to themselves, they can adapt quickly.
THERE IS NO PILOT SHORTAGE...put that Kit Darby/Fair Treatment for Experienced Pilots Act nonsense out of your mind. What there *is*, however, is a shortage of pilots willing to work for regional airline compensation/QOL. There will NEVER be a shortage of qualified candidates wanting to work at an airline like American. |
Originally Posted by BoilerUP
(Post 1027134)
No, it is not.
THERE IS NO PILOT SHORTAGE...put that Kit Darby/Fair Treatment for Experienced Pilots Act nonsense out of your mind. What there *is*, however, is a shortage of pilots willing to work for regional airline compensation/QOL. There will NEVER be a shortage of qualified candidates wanting to work at an airline like American. |
There will never be a pilot shortage for anything other than the regionals.
|
Originally Posted by rickt86
(Post 1027159)
Yet people in the past got hired at XXX major at 300 hours without being part of a target group but i guess that COULD NEVER HAPPEN AGAIN yet everything seems to keep running in circles in this industry.
But heck you COULD just read some books. If 20,000 people retire, trust me the majors will be scrambling, but it also depends on scope, and many other factors...basically this is too complicated for the INTERNET.:o Any "pilot shortage" will occur at bottom-tier operators offering comparatively weak compensation and/or lifestyle like regional airlines, charter outfits, some corporations and emerging airlines internationally - there will NEVER be an actual shortage of qualified pilots wanting to work at top-tier domestic US operators. But by all means, keep "waiting for the shortage to come" if that gives you the strength to motor on... |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:11 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands