![]() |
Originally Posted by hockeypilot44
(Post 1120285)
This is false. Most are staying until they are 65. The ones leaving early are not leaving by choice (usually medical problems).
The wall of retirement posters in dtw begs to differ. Besides, I was almost 11250 at the merger and now I'm approaching 10650.... That's 600 people leaving when there are technically no scheduled retirements. It makes me exited to think how things will move once people actually have to start going. ;) |
Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
(Post 1120494)
It makes me exited to think how things will move once people actually have to start going. ;) |
Originally Posted by Fishfreighter
(Post 1120448)
The problem with this theory is that some guys get torpedoed by circumstances beyond their control. Right, Andy? I guess you're making the argument that airline piloting is a crappy career by design.
If that's what you're shooting for, I'd agree... I'm loathe to use personal finances as a yardstick for changing retirement age because that argument places pilots' personal needs above safety. In 2012, I will hit 8+ years on furlough in the 12 years since being hired by United. I'm not alone in that fate; I'm just fortunate that I didn't get hired at AMR because those furloughees have seen their careers crater even more than United furloughees. I've done OK financially since being furloughed but there are plenty of others who have had a very tough road to hoe. And the second furlough was even tougher for many of us than the first. Have there been more old pilots than young pilots who have had their homes foreclosed on in the last decade? I'll bet that more young pilots have lost their homes. So let's say we ignore safety aspects of aging because {sarcasm] we all KNOW that every airline pilot is Benjamin Button - as they get older, they are better, stronger, sexier, faster, etc. [/sarcasm] We would need to use personal finances as a measurement of whether or not we should allow pilots to continue to fly past a certain age. What's the maximum amount of personal wealth that a pilot could have without being forced to retire? $1 million? $10 million? Pick a number because if anyone's using the personal finance argument as the reason for/against an age change, they're saying that safety doesn't matter. 65's now the law. It isn't going to get rolled back to 60. But you would have to be extremely naive to think that there aren't forces at work pushing to increase retirement age. Frankly, it's in the government's best interest to have all citizens work until one day prior to dying. ... I'm still waiting to read details from Johnso29 on these 163 retirements at Delta. |
Originally Posted by selcal
(Post 1120095)
Well, at ASA I heard a senior capt talking about how his AME asked if he wanted to be a part of some test for age 67. Not flying past 65, as that is the rule, but just extra monitoring of his health I guess. He of course was exited.
I was trying to figure out how to put a "your" where there should be a "you're" but couldn't make it work. Just making sure your up to speed on things. |
Originally Posted by Andy
(Post 1120500)
Airline piloting is a crappy career by design. That was the case even when the industry was regulated. Hence the age old saying to always keep your first house and first wife.
I'm loathe to use personal finances as a yardstick for changing retirement age because that argument places pilots' personal needs above safety. In 2012, I will hit 8+ years on furlough in the 12 years since being hired by United. I'm not alone in that fate; I'm just fortunate that I didn't get hired at AMR because those furloughees have seen their careers crater even more than United furloughees. I've done OK financially since being furloughed but there are plenty of others who have had a very tough road to hoe. And the second furlough was even tougher for many of us than the first. Have there been more old pilots than young pilots who have had their homes foreclosed on in the last decade? I'll bet that more young pilots have lost their homes. So let's say we ignore safety aspects of aging because {sarcasm] we all KNOW that every airline pilot is Benjamin Button - as they get older, they are better, stronger, sexier, faster, etc. [/sarcasm] We would need to use personal finances as a measurement of whether or not we should allow pilots to continue to fly past a certain age. What's the maximum amount of personal wealth that a pilot could have without being forced to retire? $1 million? $10 million? Pick a number because if anyone's using the personal finance argument as the reason for/against an age change, they're saying that safety doesn't matter. 65's now the law. It isn't going to get rolled back to 60. But you would have to be extremely naive to think that there aren't forces at work pushing to increase retirement age. Frankly, it's in the government's best interest to have all citizens work until one day prior to dying. ... I'm still waiting to read details from Johnso29 on these 163 retirements at Delta. |
Originally Posted by Andy
(Post 1120500)
... I'm still waiting to read details from Johnso29 on these 163 retirements at Delta.
Other than trying to scare the Bejebus outta them while flying, the only other way I can think to hasten their departure is to ditch em in some Ebola infested cathouse in Africa. |
Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
(Post 1120502)
ahem, justdoingmyjob... from earlier in the thread. :D
I was trying to figure out how to put a "your" where there should be a "you're" but couldn't make it work. Just making sure your up to speed on things. |
Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
(Post 1120494)
The wall of retirement posters in dtw begs to differ.
Besides, I was almost 11250 at the merger and now I'm approaching 10650.... That's 600 people leaving when there are technically no scheduled retirements. The early buyout took out 215 in 2009. 215 pilots take Delta buyout offers | ajc.com Were there other external factors for the other 375 retirements? Edit: You posted that there was another early retirement package which took out another 163 while I was posting. So that accounts for all but 200. |
Originally Posted by Justdoinmyjob
(Post 1120505)
From what I can gather listening to guys talk in the crew room, for most of the fNWA guys, it can make more sense to go early rather than wait to 65 because of the cost of health insurance. I don't really listen though. AFAIC, they will go when they go, and I'll just keep waiting for that day.
|
Originally Posted by Andy
(Post 1120512)
retirements as pilots who chose to benevolently retire before reaching age 65. He failed to mention incentive packages for those retiring 'early'.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:17 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands