Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
Need help with CRJ200 W&B App. >

Need help with CRJ200 W&B App.

Search
Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Need help with CRJ200 W&B App.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-08-2012, 03:39 PM
  #21  
Sho me da money!
 
FIIGMO's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: B25, Left
Posts: 947
Default

Originally Posted by bernouli View Post
Yet another wet blanket.

Listen buzz killington, I hope you never use your phone to check the weather.
A Go jet pilot........ I get it now. You are right..... I am wrong
FIIGMO is offline  
Old 03-08-2012, 03:41 PM
  #22  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
jaded's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: Airline #4
Posts: 450
Default

Originally Posted by FIIGMO View Post
A Go jet pilot........
I'd like to keep this thread about this app, so lets not even go there...
jaded is offline  
Old 03-08-2012, 03:48 PM
  #23  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Avroman's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: FIRE ALPA
Posts: 3,082
Default

Originally Posted by jaded View Post
nordo, you set the parameters for bow simply by touching the 31000 with your finger, it should bring up a cursor and keyboard to let you edit it. the app will save your bow, pax weight, half weight and bag weight even if you turn your phone off.

I've been waiting on whether or not to make a 700/900 version. I wasn't quite sure if they were as weight critical as the 200
4+ years on the 900's and never had a takeoff weight issue and only a few times was close on landing weight issues. Not quite as good as the Avro that way but close.
Avroman is offline  
Old 03-08-2012, 03:55 PM
  #24  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Posts: 183
Default

44,53, and 57 at AWAC.
jackal24 is offline  
Old 03-08-2012, 03:56 PM
  #25  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
jaded's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: Airline #4
Posts: 450
Default

Originally Posted by jackal24 View Post
44,53, and 57 at AWAC.
jackal, can you clarify? 44 zfw 53 max to... what's 57? did you mean 47?
jaded is offline  
Old 03-08-2012, 04:13 PM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
jaded's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: Airline #4
Posts: 450
Default

Originally Posted by Avroman View Post
4+ years on the 900's and never had a takeoff weight issue and only a few times was close on landing weight issues. Not quite as good as the Avro that way but close.
Didn't think those 900s had issues. Im guessing never really asked people to move from front to back on the avro lol.
jaded is offline  
Old 03-08-2012, 04:19 PM
  #27  
Gets Weekends Off
 
RU4692's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: Professional Monkey Trainer
Posts: 309
Default

Originally Posted by jaded View Post
Hello everyone, I need a little assistance with an iPhone app I am currently working on. I've made an app called PocketACARS and what it does is it simply figures out how many bags/pax you can take when you are weight critical (it doesnt calculate balance) It is mainly for planning purposes (non ACARS environment, gate agent bugging you, jumpseater etc...)

Long story short, version 1.01 is currently in the app store but I have 53,000 (max struct. to limit) 47,000 (max land limit) and 44,000 (max ZFW) currently hard coded as the absolute limitation... I've heard of different airlines having different limitations so I'd like to ask you 200 drivers out there if you have limitations that are different to the ones Ive listed above, not including min flight weight or max ramp weight. I only need those 3 limitations if yours are different so that way I can incorporate it on the next version of my app, which is actually FREE! Feel free to download it if you'd like... If the moderators would let me, here's the link:

App Store - PocketACARS

Your numbers ring a bell. If I am recalling correctly you can even get a -100 certified to -200 weights, with an LOA.

If you could get the FAA to give it their blessing you could have a potentially rewarding career opportunity. Especially if you could do performance tailored for 757, 767, 777, A380 etc. If it saves time & money, the 121 world wants it.

I've used Ultranav before for a Part 91 outfit and it's perfectly legal as far as W&B goes. As long as your programming has the exact numbers at the Manufacturers data... they'll approve it.

Well done man... Looks like your on to something.
RU4692 is offline  
Old 03-08-2012, 05:25 PM
  #28  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: FO
Posts: 3,032
Default

You could make the MLW, ZFW, AND MTOW changeable and that way more than just CRJ operators may buy it.

If you use my idea, chip me off 10%. I keed I keed....kind of
BlueMoon is offline  
Old 03-08-2012, 05:27 PM
  #29  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: FO
Posts: 3,032
Default

Do all CRJ100/200 operators use 2 pax zones for W&B or do any of you guys use more, just curios. (before somebody says it, I know the 700/900 have more than 2 zones)
BlueMoon is offline  
Old 03-08-2012, 08:28 PM
  #30  
Gets Weekends Off
 
jrmyl's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: 747
Posts: 356
Default

I am long removed from CMR, but when I was there we had -200's with a 51000 MTOW as well as the 53000 limit. Not sure if any others have those or not.
jrmyl is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Maiquer
Hangar Talk
0
10-05-2011 12:30 PM
ufgatorpilot
Hangar Talk
3
05-01-2010 09:55 AM
gasnhaul
Cargo
4
08-23-2007 04:22 AM
Tinpusher007
Cargo
6
08-04-2006 08:32 PM
FO4LIFE
Fractional
4
02-13-2006 06:42 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices