Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
Airlines Lobbie the White House >

Airlines Lobbie the White House

Search
Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Airlines Lobbie the White House

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-31-2012, 08:14 AM
  #1  
Underpaid...
Thread Starter
 
What's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Position: French-Canadian
Posts: 2,101
Default Airlines Lobbie the White House

For this of you that haven't seen this, please take a minute and read the presentation that the President of American Airlines, CEO of American Eagle used during his visit to the White House last fall as the 1,500 hr rule and the new rest rules where being evaluated by our current administration!

http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/defa...10122011-1.pdf
What is offline  
Old 03-31-2012, 08:26 AM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
afterburn81's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Position: A320
Posts: 1,308
Default

Ya know dude, thanks for the post but I'm not even going to look at it. Things like this just get me so fired up.
afterburn81 is offline  
Old 03-31-2012, 08:33 AM
  #3  
You scratched my anchor
 
Al Czervik's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Posts: 4,876
Default

Actually a good article for pilots.
Al Czervik is offline  
Old 03-31-2012, 08:36 AM
  #4  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2011
Position: 737 CA
Posts: 949
Default

Seems pretty much in line with the typical management hissy fit "we're going to have to pay more to hire more to cover flying." That, in line with the low-timers complaining they NEED to get on at an airline with 500TT because their Riddle or ATP training has totally prepared them for the 121 cockpit.

The one group of people you see with a bit of sense in the argument is the higher time pilots who have actually been there, done that.
DirectTo is offline  
Old 03-31-2012, 08:36 AM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2008
Position: Citation, left seat
Posts: 345
Default

I think I just vomited
Skypilotsv1984 is offline  
Old 03-31-2012, 08:57 AM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2011
Posts: 205
Default

Originally Posted by DirectTo View Post
Seems pretty much in line with the typical management hissy fit "we're going to have to pay more to hire more to cover flying." That, in line with the low-timers complaining they NEED to get on at an airline with 500TT because their Riddle or ATP training has totally prepared them for the 121 cockpit.

The one group of people you see with a bit of sense in the argument is the higher time pilots who have actually been there, done that.
Like I wrote on another thread, the solution is really simple. Pay pilots more. Do what every other industry does, and compete for skilled labor. Pay enough and there will be no shortage. Make better work rules. Raise ticket prices. Maybe the airline industry needs to shrink a little. Maybe smaller markets that are unprofitable shouldn't be served. God forbid people have to drive an hour farther to get to an airport and fly to a hub.

Why are google and Facebook such great places to work? Because they compete hard to acquire skilled programmers and designers. The way of the future might be increasing the number of smaller planes, but I think the public would rather have well-paid and well-rested (and somewhat happy) pilots that the alternative.

The unions should start a public campaign - "Would you pay $3 more per ticket to have a well qualified, well rested pilot?"
drrhythm2 is offline  
Old 03-31-2012, 09:02 AM
  #7  
Bracing for Fallacies
 
block30's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: In favor of good things, not in favor of bad things
Posts: 3,543
Default

Isn't that old news given the NPRM that just came? Not trying to be mean. I do find it funny how bigh the numbers are that mgt qoutes as being necessary due to the rest rules. *If* the posts I have read on APC are correct, mgt will be able to tinker with numbers and schedules to need very little to NO more pilots. Scare tactics.

Also of note, I see some airlines minimums (regionals) are just starting to rise up to 135 minimums. What an interesting shift in the paradigm from the 90's....
block30 is offline  
Old 03-31-2012, 09:05 AM
  #8  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Posts: 125
Default

"Short Call Reserve - Time spend on short call reserve should not be included as part of duty, until the pilot is called and notified of his/her assignment"

That sounds fair and safe, wait at home all day from 6AM - 7:59PM and then get a call for a CDO, Highspeed, stand-up where you could technically fly all night until 8AM the next morning. That would be a 26 hour duty period. How can they argue this point with a straight face? Where is the Union's rebuttal presentation?
jayray is offline  
Old 03-31-2012, 09:10 AM
  #9  
Gets Weekends Off
 
olympic's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: 747
Posts: 731
Default

Funny thing about this article and presentation is that it doesn't show how much they are paying these poor guys.
olympic is offline  
Old 03-31-2012, 09:13 AM
  #10  
New Hire
 
Joined APC: Jul 2011
Position: Front Seat
Posts: 6
Default

Not just a good article for pilots. The flying public needs to read this. Airlines always talk about safety first, but this article never mentions safety. It proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that airline management is only worried about the financial impact of these new safety rules.
Lake Lice is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Tsuda
Major
24
12-01-2011 10:04 PM
jsled
Major
62
03-16-2010 12:52 PM
woodfinx
Hangar Talk
0
07-31-2009 06:12 AM
Splanky
Regional
11
09-17-2008 02:52 PM
multipilot
Regional
11
06-15-2008 06:58 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices