Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Regional (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/regional/)
-   -   NPRM results released? (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/regional/67942-nprm-results-released.html)

coryk 07-07-2012 05:37 PM


Originally Posted by skylover (Post 1225224)
I was emailing with somebody who works at the FAA and he said August 2. Not sure if this is accurate though.

When they release the results of the NPRM?

skylover 07-07-2012 05:42 PM


Originally Posted by coryk (Post 1226248)
When they release the results of the NPRM?

When they release the final rule

hemaybedid 07-07-2012 10:00 PM


Originally Posted by Red97Vette (Post 1225569)
I thought every regional had a rule like this. Otherwise anyone hired with less than ATP mins would never upgrade.. I might be confusing it though with in house requirements for upgrade. At ASA I think we use something like a 2 for 1 ratio of right seat time to count as PIC time for meeting upgrade mins.

You're definitely confusing your quote with in house upgrade requirements. They're speaking of FO's not having an ATP and not meeting these requirements listed in FAR 61.159:

(4) 250 hours of flight time in an airplane as a pilot in command, or as second in command performing the duties of pilot in command while under the supervision of a pilot in command, or any combination thereof, which includes at least—
(i) 100 hours of cross-country flight time; and
(ii) 25 hours of night flight time.

The concern I have read about this section of the FAR's elsewhere, is that several FSDO's have recently raised issue with this section stating, "if the pilot doesn't have the priviliges to act as PIC (PIC type rating in an aircraft that requires it) they cannot act as PIC under the supervision of PIC for the purposes of this section. That would mean you could only use time as SIC in a non turbo jet aircraft and an aircraft under 12,500 lbs. gross weight, however, requiring a SIC to log time towards the ATP under this FAR.

Your company requirement for Captain upgrade is not involved. Those requirements I believe are completely at the discretion of the company. I've heard at GoJet the requirement for upgrade without any company time is 4500 TT adjusted with company time to 3500 TT. Correct me if I'm wrong. But that is one way they've kept their pilot costs so low. New guys with lots of time, one of which groups was United furloughs, upgrade quickly on the low side of the longevity scale and hopefully leave quickly. And most FO's get out before upgrade and the big pay bump either from being sick of waiting around or scared of the upgrade program that I've heard is more than a little shady.

goodyear859 07-16-2012 04:53 AM

Getting closer to the Aug 1 deadline....could be a real game
changer for the industry...any rumors out there?

coryk 07-16-2012 07:50 AM


Originally Posted by goodyear859 (Post 1230543)
Getting closer to the Aug 1 deadline....could be a real game
changer for the industry...any rumors out there?

I know before the NPRM was released the ARC wanted 500tt for college grads, 1000 for military guys.Then they released the proposed 1000/750 hour deal. With all the "pilot shortage" talk in the news lately, I bet the cave and drop the new mins. Just my guess.

BoilerUP 07-16-2012 09:07 AM


Originally Posted by goodyear859 (Post 1230543)
Getting closer to the Aug 1 deadline....could be a real game
changer for the industry...any rumors out there?

The lower your expectations are, the less your disappointment with what ends up actually becoming policy will be.

Not trying to be a Debbie Downer...just realistic.

Rotor2prop 07-16-2012 11:08 AM


Originally Posted by coryk (Post 1230612)
I know before the NPRM was released the ARC wanted 500tt for college grads, 1000 for military guys.Then they released the proposed 1000/750 hour deal. With all the "pilot shortage" talk in the news lately, I bet the cave and drop the new mins. Just my guess.


Originally Posted by BoilerUP (Post 1230640)
The lower your expectations are, the less your disappointment with what ends up actually becoming policy will be.

Not trying to be a Debbie Downer...just realistic.


Having all these "pilot shortage" stories running on all the major news networks just 2 weeks before the deadline was all part of the plan. I think we all know where this final rule is going to end up. I wouldn't doubt if it wasn't cut in half for all hour levels.

"All pilots completing an airline FO training program that meet the above hour requirements will be issued a frozen ATP with SIC only authorization until full experience requirements are met for acting as PIC at the ATP level."

OR

"All pilots hired before Aug 2013 need not meet these requirements to act as SIC in 121 ops"

I would bet something like this will be what we get.

Bellanca 07-16-2012 12:40 PM

It amazes me how many people at the regional don't have the 250 hours of PIC. I've personally known some people who were hired with really low time, but most still had at least 400 hours and should have met PIC mins...

Also, just something I've been curious about, are there any FO's floating around at the airline level that for whatever reason have lost/can't get a first class medical, and will no longer be able to fly for an airline once the ATP is required because they won't be able to exercise the privileges of that cert??

flyingreasemnky 07-16-2012 12:50 PM

You don't need a first class to get an ATP, just to exercise the privileges of it. Since they aren't the pic, they aren't exercising the privileges.

Bellanca 07-16-2012 01:29 PM

If acting as a 121 FO requires an ATP cert, then wouldn't an FO have to be able to exercise privileges of an ATP cert (including holding a First Class medical)?


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:14 PM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands