Search
Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Turboprop or Jet

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-07-2006, 06:06 PM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
flyguyniner11's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: A320 CA
Posts: 765
Default

saabaroowski you seem pretty bitter towards colgan and maybe your view is skewed because of it, i've seen many guys complain a lot about situations when sometimes you just have to roll with the punches
flyguyniner11 is offline  
Old 11-07-2006, 06:09 PM
  #22  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: A-320
Posts: 6,929
Default

Yeah it wasnt too bad I just got stuck on reserve for 6 months there and got dicked around a lot, but the guys I flew with were awesome, and the plane was badass
JoeyMeatballs is offline  
Old 11-07-2006, 06:15 PM
  #23  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
flyguyniner11's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: A320 CA
Posts: 765
Default

guy i knew just got hired a couple of months ago didnt sit on reserve at all got a line right out of training, thats what i'm hoping for
flyguyniner11 is offline  
Old 11-07-2006, 08:50 PM
  #24  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Posts: 781
Default

Jet Pic is more valuable than prop Pic. I wouldn't be surprised if it becomes a requirement for all airlines. However, if I was you I would choose the airline with the best base not the type of aircraft. QOL is more important than a quicker upgrade.
BURflyer is offline  
Old 11-07-2006, 10:50 PM
  #25  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: 737FO
Posts: 177
Default

Originally Posted by flyguyniner11 View Post
I'm currently a cfi with 1000 TT and 100 multi and I cant really decide if i want to fly for a company like xjt or comair and get in a jet or fly for like colgan and get a faster upgrade but suck it up in the turboprop for a while any thoughts or advice on this issue or the companies would be greatly appreciated thanks guys!
Ok flyguyniner11, I think you may have some misconceptions. Some turboprop regional airlines in the nation have upgrade times in excess of 5 years right now. What is fast about that? Also, why would flying a turboprop be considered "sucking it up"?

Go for what works for you!!
check6 is offline  
Old 11-07-2006, 10:50 PM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: 737FO
Posts: 177
Default

Originally Posted by BURflyer View Post
Jet Pic is more valuable than prop Pic. I wouldn't be surprised if it becomes a requirement for all airlines. However, if I was you I would choose the airline with the best base not the type of aircraft. QOL is more important than a quicker upgrade.
Really? I don't believe you.
check6 is offline  
Old 11-08-2006, 02:29 AM
  #27  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
flyguyniner11's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: A320 CA
Posts: 765
Default

yeah i know that some airlines that fly turboprops have high upgrade times but not the airlines i would consider, and your right burflyer QOL is important
flyguyniner11 is offline  
Old 11-08-2006, 07:13 AM
  #28  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Position: ERJ FO
Posts: 1,276
Default

A 19 year old pilot on the cusp of getting his instrument rating last night asked me what my "dream aircraft" would be. I think he was a little hurt when I said "The one that will pay me the most money to keep me home the most time. I'd fly a 172 if I could get a better paycheck out of it and be home more often." He seemed a little upset when I told him flying was a job and that just because it goes fast, doesn't mean you'll like it.

Moral of the story - Fly whatever is going to make you happy, pay the bills, and get you home.
SharkyBN584 is offline  
Old 11-08-2006, 08:50 AM
  #29  
Gets Weekends Off
 
duvie's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Position: WB Bunkie
Posts: 1,246
Default

I had the oppurtunity when I was an intern at CAL to talk with the hiring board and sim evaluators. I had 1900 time going into the into the internship and when I did my sim training they asked me where I had been flying. They told me flat out that they the best sim performances they see during interviews are from turboprop guys. Take that for what its worth.

DISCLAIMER to all the jet jocks (especially XJT guys): They didn't say anything about their CRM skills, decision making abilities, attitude or professionalism. Nor did they say how many turboprop guys got hired as a result.

I can't stress enough that it really doesn't matter what kind of time you have. What you need are the published mins. After that the amount of time it takes to get an interview is directly proportional to how high up your internal rec is.
duvie is offline  
Old 11-08-2006, 03:16 PM
  #30  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: A-320
Posts: 6,929
Default

well if there is one thing I can do its fly an airplane, The SAAB helped but either you know how to fly an airplane or you don't its that simple. I fly with guys that have been flying turboprops for years, and they blow so one has little to do with the other
JoeyMeatballs is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Islandhopper
Hiring News
22
08-05-2007 06:36 PM
joel payne
Hangar Talk
0
11-06-2006 06:18 PM
vagabond
Hangar Talk
10
11-05-2006 09:45 PM
TripleSeven
Flight Schools and Training
9
09-13-2006 04:55 PM
BlueSun
Cargo
23
05-04-2006 11:08 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices