Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Regional (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/regional/)
-   -   Delta to buy Pinnacle (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/regional/72097-delta-buy-pinnacle.html)

CRJ900Series 01-03-2013 06:54 PM

http://homeguides.sfgate.com/DM-Resi...0&keep_ratio=1

Bartok 01-03-2013 07:31 PM

Lol

You guys act like we weren't "owned" by Delta already.


Nothing has changed for us.

Someone else will just get richer.

All part of the plan.

Move along.......Move along..............

Splash 01-03-2013 07:45 PM


Originally Posted by johnso29 (Post 1323281)
Or maybe because the DAL pilot's contact had substantial penalties for dissolving the flow back? And since Delta management signed said contract, they decided to actually comply with it? Also, I believe the concept of forced large RJ reductions as a result of flow back dissolution was in the PMNW contract.

The "substantial penalties" were vulnerable. They could have been circumvented. The goal was to make the DAL PWA better for DAL pilots.

Phuz 01-03-2013 08:53 PM


Originally Posted by Splash (Post 1323305)
The "substantial penalties" were vulnerable. They could have been circumvented. The goal was to make the DAL PWA better for DAL pilots.

Moak wasn't the only fish in the tank. But you're not changing your point of view. By the way, the DAL pwa was not up for re-negotiation on July 1, 2010.

The larger point is that being wholly owned does not magically work out positively for 9e simply because someone can point to one example of a situation where an ex-wholly owned company is currently (today only) doing alright. To completely ignore the history behind such a statement only does a disservice to people trying to decide what their future holds. This is not the same circumstance, not even close.

johnso29 01-03-2013 09:00 PM


Originally Posted by Splash (Post 1323305)
The "substantial penalties" were vulnerable. They could have been circumvented. The goal was to make the DAL PWA better for DAL pilots.

Yeah......ok. Because big ole mighty LM changed so much. :rolleyes:

ShyGuy 01-03-2013 09:48 PM

If I heard correctly, a topped out 9E FA would make more than a topped out FO. What self respectig FO would vote yes to this?

Phuz 01-03-2013 09:53 PM


Originally Posted by johnso29 (Post 1323323)
Yeah......ok. Because big ole mighty LM changed so much. :rolleyes:

http://s9.postimage.org/6yzhwbtn3/IMG_1032.jpg

This doesn't happen often. I'ma go refuel my Corsair :cool:

Saabs 01-03-2013 09:54 PM


Originally Posted by ShyGuy (Post 1323342)
If I heard correctly, a topped out 9E FA would make more than a topped out FO. What self respectig FO would vote yes to this?

One that wants an FA as a sugar mama

ShyGuy 01-03-2013 09:56 PM


Originally Posted by Saabs (Post 1323345)
One that wants an FA as a sugar mama

Well played! :)

whataclub 01-04-2013 04:47 AM


Originally Posted by ShyGuy (Post 1323342)
If I heard correctly, a topped out 9E FA would make more than a topped out FO. What self respectig FO would vote yes to this?

Untrue, as per the new FA agreement their pay scale tops out at 15 years and at about $32 and change, the FO pay scale under the new TA will top out at $37 and change. The only time an FA will make more money than an FO are the 6+ years FA's will make more than first year FO's, once a first officer hits year 2 pay they will make more than any FA on property.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:23 PM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands