Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

turboprops and merger

Old 11-16-2006, 10:30 AM
  #1  
Line Holder
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: trying to survive
Posts: 91
Default turboprops and merger

As many of you know from my last post, I'm trying to get in with a regional that fly's turboprops because that’s what interests me the most right now. I was wondering, when looking at places like Colgan or Piedmont, what current employees of either company think this possible USA/DAL merger will do to these companies/aircraft. Do you guys think your company (Colgan, Piedmont, or other turboprop operator for USA) will be better or worse off? Just wondered what the word on that was, thanks.
beech2jet is offline  
Old 11-16-2006, 10:35 AM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
LivinTheDream28's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Posts: 250
Default

Originally Posted by beech2jet View Post
As many of you know from my last post, I'm trying to get in with a regional that fly's turboprops because that’s what interests me the most right now. I was wondering, when looking at places like Colgan or Piedmont, what current employees of either company think this possible USA/DAL merger will do to these companies/aircraft. Do you guys think your company (Colgan, Piedmont, or other turboprop operator for USA) will be better or worse off? Just wondered what the word on that was, thanks.
I haven't heard anything yet but I guess it would depend on if the "New Delta" wanted to keep those routes in there system or just convert them to jet legs. Some of the routes don't seem like they'd need jet service and I know certain airports US Airways Express currently serves in the NE couldn't accommodate an RJ. That’s a good question I'm wondering the same.
LivinTheDream28 is offline  
Old 11-16-2006, 02:30 PM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Position: 7ER B...whatever that means.
Posts: 3,966
Default

Originally Posted by beech2jet View Post
As many of you know from my last post, I'm trying to get in with a regional that fly's turboprops because that’s what interests me the most right now. I was wondering, when looking at places like Colgan or Piedmont, what current employees of either company think this possible USA/DAL merger will do to these companies/aircraft. Do you guys think your company (Colgan, Piedmont, or other turboprop operator for USA) will be better or worse off? Just wondered what the word on that was, thanks.
Be careful not to let airplane type be the thing that decides your future. In the end a puddle jumper is a puddle jumper (just some puddles are bigger than others ). The important things are pay, QOL and progression. I would fly a rubberband powered biplane if they gave me a big pile of money, I could be home every night and there was good progression into something I really wanted to do.
freezingflyboy is offline  
Old 11-16-2006, 02:38 PM
  #4  
APC co-founder
 
HSLD's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2005
Position: B777
Posts: 5,853
Default

One thing Doug Parker talked about yesterday was the idea of synergies being created by a merger. Just in case your wondering, "synergies" in the airline business means eliminating capacity, manpower, and cost overlap. If a merger happens, my bet is that there could be a regional airline out there without a mainline partner to feed.
HSLD is offline  
Old 11-16-2006, 02:45 PM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Baronpilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: B737 FO
Posts: 380
Default

Depending on where you live, Colgan might be a viable option because they primarily do out and backs, so you are home every night. As far as stabilty is concerned, they operate for two other airlines other than US Airways.
Baronpilot is offline  
Old 11-16-2006, 08:35 PM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Rightseat Ballast's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2005
Position: E170/175 CA
Posts: 334
Default

On the airways side... I think Colgan has a stable future. A lot of their flying is government awarded Essential Air Service contracts, and the owner of Colgan just happens to be a politician (state senator last I worked there). Colgan will continue to keep their EAS routes no matter what shakes out. As for Piedmont... I can see Airways looking for a way to shed the liability of having a wholly owned carrier, but I can also see a need for the Dash in the Northeast. Delta just started Dash service ala Mesa/Freedom. Perhaps in a post-merger world, Mesa will be out of the picture, and Piedmont will cover the combined Dash flying. Turboprops are a great asset in the Northeast, and despite customer perceptions, they will live to fly another day.
Rightseat Ballast is offline  
Old 11-17-2006, 08:12 AM
  #7  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,183
Default

Originally Posted by beech2jet View Post
As many of you know from my last post, I'm trying to get in with a regional that fly's turboprops because that’s what interests me the most right now. I was wondering, when looking at places like Colgan or Piedmont, what current employees of either company think this possible USA/DAL merger will do to these companies/aircraft. Do you guys think your company (Colgan, Piedmont, or other turboprop operator for USA) will be better or worse off? Just wondered what the word on that was, thanks.
Doug Parker is known to not be a big RJ fan. I would assume that turboprops will be around for a long time. High fuel prices (t-props are a lot more effecient) and hi-tech planes like the Q400 will help ensure their survival.
rickair7777 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices