Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
GED = Good Enough for Delta >

GED = Good Enough for Delta

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

GED = Good Enough for Delta

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-15-2013 | 07:49 PM
  #121  
Check Essential's Avatar
Works Every Weekend
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 3,506
Likes: 0
From: 737 ATL
Default

Moak is after Hilda Solis' job as we speak.
Reply
Old 01-15-2013 | 07:50 PM
  #122  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 165
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Elvis90
Why stop at a bachelor's degree? Should graduation from high school be a requirement as well? It's not required for an ATP. All that counts is the flight experience, right?

According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, unemployment is half as high for college graduates as for high school graduates; college grads earn more, typically receiving a return on their college investment after only four years.

Why a College Degree? - Forbes

Delta can hire anyone it wants to, it sets the bar as high or as low as it feels comfortable with. Typically, though, they've set expectations pretty high.
It also says of good moral character.

Both 80 and Bar seem to be all knowing soothsayers of how good (or bad) a pilot is both with and without a college degree without even having seen them.

These gentlemen both seem to be a lacking in a certain kind of character that seems to have slipped past them in Big D's CRM school.

Vitriol to other pilots. Classy you two...I'm guessing I can't ignore mods, maybe tool of the day has some room...
Reply
Old 01-15-2013 | 07:53 PM
  #123  
Ftrooppilot's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,349
Likes: 0
From: Body at sea level; heart at 70,000+
Default

Originally Posted by hitimefurl
It [ a college degree] also says of good moral character.
That's one of the most comical statements I have read on the forums.
Reply
Old 01-15-2013 | 08:00 PM
  #124  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 165
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Ftrooppilot
That's one of the most comical statements I have read on the forums.
Wrong parenthetical

Sec. 61.151 Eligibility requirements: General.

To be eligible for an airline transport pilot certificate, a person must--
(a) Be at least 23 years of age;
(b) Be able to read, speak, write, and understand the English language.
(c) Be of good moral character;
(d) Meet at least one of the following requirements:

(1) Hold at least a commercial pilot certificate and instrument rating;
(2) Meet the military experience requirements under Sec. 61.73 of this part to qualify for a commercial pilot certificate, and an instrument rating if the person is a rated military pilot or former rated military pilot of an Armed Force of the United States; or
(3) Hold either a foreign airline transport pilot or foreign commercial pilot license and an instrument rating, without limitations issued by a contracting State to the Convention on International Civil Aviation.
Reply
Old 01-15-2013 | 08:03 PM
  #125  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 2,530
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Check Essential
Moak is after Hilda Solis' job as we speak.
More like Randy Babbit's. Pays a LOT more.
Reply
Old 01-15-2013 | 08:33 PM
  #126  
80ktsClamp's Avatar
Da Hudge
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 17,473
Likes: 0
From: Poodle Whisperer
Default

Originally Posted by PCL_128
All of this arguing, and nobody even knows if this "vault letter" even exists?

Go get laid.
Ask your PCL MEC buddies. It's legit.
Reply
Old 01-15-2013 | 08:36 PM
  #127  
80ktsClamp's Avatar
Da Hudge
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 17,473
Likes: 0
From: Poodle Whisperer
Default

Originally Posted by hitimefurl
It also says of good moral character.

Both 80 and Bar seem to be all knowing soothsayers of how good (or bad) a pilot is both with and without a college degree without even having seen them.

These gentlemen both seem to be a lacking in a certain kind of character that seems to have slipped past them in Big D's CRM school.

Vitriol to other pilots. Classy you two...I'm guessing I can't ignore mods, maybe tool of the day has some room...
Care to show me where I stated that having a college degree makes a pilot good or bad? Quote, please.
Reply
Old 01-15-2013 | 08:37 PM
  #128  
captjns's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
10M Airline Miles
20 Years
150 Countries Visited
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 6,230
Likes: 62
From: B-737NG preferably in first class with a glass of champagne and caviar
Default

Originally Posted by Delta1067
Have some thicker skin you little nancy The last thing I am is the spelling police because my posts aren't perfect and contain mistakes. I was only ribbing you because you choose to promote the importance of education in a post that contained about 10 errors. Lighten up man and learn to take a little ribbing. Sorry I touched a nerve. Feel free to point out mistakes in my posts and I will take about 1 second to get over it without getting my boxers all in a wad.
I was merely lampooning the so-called issue which is truly a non-issue. I didn't mean to cause anyone any angst. I am an advocate of advanced education which is evinced through my children. Oldest a doctor, and the other studying law. As far as I'm concerned it doesn't get any better than that.
Reply
Old 01-15-2013 | 08:41 PM
  #129  
Bucking Bar's Avatar
Can't abide NAI
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 12,078
Likes: 15
From: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Default

Originally Posted by Sink r8
... I guess the bridge agreement is not a rumor:

1) Who exactly is the Airline Pilot Association that is referred to in Section 1(A) of our contract? I always assumed it was the Delta MEC. I think most pilots assume this. Can this association negotiate with Delta without any involvement by the DAL MEC? I think most guys assume it cannot.
The Railway Labor Act outlines the power that the Air Line Pilots Association has as our exclusive (meaning one and only) Bargaining Agent.

Section IV, Section 2, of ALPA's Constitution and Bylaws provides each MEC broad autonomy to deal with issues that concern that airlines' pilots.

ALPA can, and has, negotiated without the concurrence of the Delta MEC. It has the power to do so, but most ALPA politicians have respected the Delta MEC. The fact an ALPA President has authorized the sort of bargaining which took place here is a change from past ALPA policy.

Originally Posted by Sink r8
2) Is the "meet-and-confer" requirement binding only on the mainline side? If our MEC was not involved, does it not invalidate that requirement? You cannot have it both ways: either we all meet-and-confer, or we do not.
You see it how most people see it. Section 40 of our union's Admin Manual, Part 1, Paragraph 3, establishes a process by which airlines in an mainline / express system meet and review opening proposals. The goal is to coordinate and work together towards a common goal. This coordination prevents harm which impacts pilots across carrier lines, as we see here in modifications to the Delta PWA, committing airplanes from other DCI carriers and reordering preferential interview opportunities.

The way this is supposed to work is that our President would not authorize bargaining contrary to our Admin Manual.

However, reports are that Lee Moak did authorize this bargaining with the understanding that it did not effect the Delta pilot working agreement, which brings us to a much deeper problem. The concept that this is "none of your business."

For this to be "none of our business" it would mean that any flying Delta permits is no longer "Delta flying." This is a a significant policy change. Until now, Delta flying has remained Delta flying even if it is permitted to be flown elsewhere. We owned Delta flying. ... draw a real big circle. (ignore the titles, I had to borrow an unrelated image)

With this new interpretation we only own what we explicitly own and everything else is fair game for other pilot groups to sit down with our management and negotiate for. Real quickly you can see how the new definition of "Delta flying" looks something like a map of Fulton County, GA.
That is why this precedent has the potential to really harm Delta pilots. With other pilot groups at the table, we are just one competitor among many for flying. New flying, new Company operations, which we have not explicitly scoped (and how can we know what might be created ... Delta has a handful of Certificates that it is not using) could be anyone's.
Reply
Old 01-15-2013 | 08:50 PM
  #130  
Bucking Bar's Avatar
Can't abide NAI
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 12,078
Likes: 15
From: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Default

Originally Posted by Sink r8
3) (Or) Is this the issue here the relationship between the administration and MEC? Could we have been involved, but only at the administration level?

This may not amount to much, in the end. Maybe this is a matter of TO working something out with LM and E9 that meets the letter of the meet-and-confer requirement.
Those you mentioned are on record stating they did not meet and confer. There was no coordination at an administrative level.

A handful are angry that this has seen the light of day. To them I ask, why do believe it best that the governance of our union be kept secret from it's members.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
flysooner9
Hangar Talk
2
09-14-2011 07:37 PM
jungle
Money Talk
1
04-21-2011 09:56 PM
StormChaser
Major
378
08-10-2009 12:25 PM
ToiletDuck
Hangar Talk
10
01-15-2007 08:59 PM
CALPilotToo
Cargo
25
11-26-2006 10:15 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices