Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Regional (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/regional/)
-   -   Dear United Mainline, (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/regional/74133-dear-united-mainline.html)

xjtguy 04-10-2013 04:51 AM


Originally Posted by Sunvox (Post 1387985)
a) This sucks and we should all send a loud message to corporate that we don't like it, both UAL and UAX pilots alike.

b) By and large it won't affect most UAX commutes most of the time.

UA has unlimited jumpseat provisions in the pilot contract.

P.S. I commuted from SFO to JFK and JFK to SFO for a brief period after bankruptcy and the company tried imposing "fees" at that time as well. It didn't last long . . .

I remember that. However, there was brief period of time when UAL STILL had the "only as many JS riders allowed as seats installed" that almost every other legacy did at the time.

So for an offline guy it could suck. UAL pilot doesn't want to pay to ride, and that's fine, so he OMC's. Offline pilot shows up for an OMC and gets denied because that single JS 757 with 30-40-50 open seats already has an OMC.

It was a minority of the time that a CA would waive it, that's assuming the offline pilot could ACTUALLY get past the agent and down to the cockpit to talk to the CA.

Thank god it went unlimited.

gojo 04-10-2013 05:13 AM


Originally Posted by xjtguy (Post 1388014)
I remember that. However, there was brief period of time when UAL STILL had the "only as many JS riders allowed as seats installed" that almost every other legacy did at the time.

So for an offline guy it could suck. UAL pilot doesn't want to pay to ride, and that's fine, so he OMC's. Offline pilot shows up for an OMC and gets denied because that single JS 757 with 30-40-50 open seats already has an OMC.

It was a minority of the time that a CA would waive it, that's assuming the offline pilot could ACTUALLY get past the agent and down to the cockpit to talk to the CA.

Thank god it went unlimited.

When I was at Mesaba during years 05 - 06ish NortLeaving nowhwest tried this as well. If I remember correctly, there was a cutoff point where some of the senior people were grandfathered in and didn't have to pay it. Makes sense right? Make the $22.00 an hour guy pay it

Captain Tony 04-10-2013 05:35 AM


Originally Posted by highflyer0685 (Post 1387948)
wouldn't brag about working for Republic :D

I don't work for Republic :D

pitch mode 04-10-2013 05:49 AM

UAL knows the commuters will pay it. Will the (for example) ORD based person who lives in the Albany,NY area move? No. Are they going to drive to ORD? NO. They will P&M, but will pony up the loot. Petty on UAL,yes. Furloughing to farm out to regional carriers only to have the furloughees work for the very mainline-regional that put them on the street confirms their confidence in their decisions. They would save money and make more revenue by flying the most efficient size aircraft and staffing it appropriately. CRJ's that are plagued with maintainance and W&B issues into a filthy ORD gate,do not seem to be the way to go IMO.

It Just Doesn't Matter! - Meatballs (6/9) Movie CLIP (1979) HD - YouTube

Captain Tony 04-10-2013 05:49 AM


Originally Posted by Lambourne (Post 1387961)
Great, you can use those benefits to ride someone else as I won't let you Jumpseat on my mainline plane either. We will be "wt restricted' also just like every other RJ out there that I have ever tried to Jumpseat on. In fact we may have too much cargo to fill the empties in the cabin except for our own non-revs. Just like the "we don't have ballast or its too small up here for a jumpseater in the cockpit of the RJ". You get to watch us depart just like we watch you.

Hope that doesn't affect you on your way home either. That would be terrible. Maybe some of that string of express pilots I see from ORD to DEN or MCO will have to use all their extra pass benefits to get home. That is if they can find a mainline carrier pilot group they haven't pi$$ed off yet to carry them.

And you'll have to explain to your chief pilot why you claimed your plane was weight restricted when it actually wasn't. I never have that problem. I don't have to fake it. But you go ahead and do your worst tough guy. I'll just take Delta.


Originally Posted by Lambourne (Post 1387961)
Here are my thoughts.

1. No one makes you commute. That means NO ONE. It is a choice and it has been part of the industry for a long time. If you didn't understand the possibile plus and minuses of commuting when you started that is not a mainline pilots fault.

Really? I understand the plusses and minuses. I also own a house that is worth less than I owe, and would have had to move 5 times if I followed bases at this company. But nevermind, you answered your own question below.


Originally Posted by Lambourne (Post 1387961)
2. Your base has been changed or closed. Again not a mainline pilots fault. You don't work for the mainline. You company bids for flying from every carrier in the US. You need to address you base concerns with your company. They bid the flying and move the basses. Again, not a mainline pilots fault.

Not the mainline pilots fault, but yes mainline management's fault. They create startup regional carriers who work for peanuts in order to make me "compete" with them in order to lower their costs (and pay you better bonuses). So my company has to re-bid every few years and all the bases get realigned. [sarcasm on] So sorry I don't work for mainline. I really enjoyed the extra 5 years I've spent at a regional while you greedy boomers rewarded yourselves with 5 extra years at the top of the pay scales. [sarcasm off]


Originally Posted by Lambourne (Post 1387961)
3. Waste fuel. Good one. The majors never shuffle the deck with new carriers to replace the poor performing ones. Look at Mesa. They performed poorly and were replaced by Expressjet. Now Mesa is recalling and I wouldn't be surprised if they don't re-rise from tne ashes when the scope provisions kick in to fly more large RJ's. Please committ suicide with your FFD agreement. Perhaps the sooner your metrics get worse (not sure how that could be) UA can replace you. Not a mainline pilots fault that you don't understand that outsourced services are re-bid all the time. You are not doing yourself any favors by making your company less efficient.

My regional has 5-15 year contracts. Not going away any time soon. Predictably, you have no idea what you're talking about. And wasting fuel affects your management, and YOUR profit sharing. Saving fuel gets me nothing. Plus, how short sighted of you to hope I get replaced with my contract and benefits near the top of the regional industry. My replacement will work for half what I make, and put more downward pressure on your contract. Duh.


Originally Posted by Lambourne (Post 1387961)
4. If you decided to try to disrupt the operation by delaying flights. How would anyone know?

Ask the DOT complaint department. I read in the paper that they're very familiar with your airline.


Originally Posted by Lambourne (Post 1387961)
Finally I ageee the pass changes stink. However we too as mainline employees have had pass changed over the years. This world is full of changes. If you do not like the change YOU need to address it with YOuR management. Mainline pilots don't negotiate or do your dirty work for you. This issue is between the outsourced company and the mainline management. Should mainline pilots fight the battles for the cleaning crew that is outsourced when UA adjust their contract? Should the cleaners withhold cockpit trash bags in retaliation for mainline pilots not coming to join their cause?

I have addressed it with my management. They said "We don't control the pass privileges, we have no choice. Thanks For All You Do". The only ones that can change it are your management. The only way to get their attention is to cost them money and labor problems. Get it now?


Originally Posted by Lambourne (Post 1387961)
There is a great deal of growing up that needs to take place in regional cockpits. I certainly hope some of this is being vetted in our hiring process. Maybe at least our crews can forward flights and dates where they were bumped or given hard times to the hiring team to weed those candidates from the stacks of applications.

There's a great deal of retiring that needs to happen in your cockpits.


Originally Posted by Lambourne (Post 1387961)
I know I have sent emails and made phone calls regarding one SKYW Capt that I hope never gets a shot at UA. Surprisingly enough the pilot DID have an App in the stack. If he is hired I do hope we get to fly together. That would be great fun, for me at least.

Go ahead and blackball all of us. In a few years anyone with a pulse will get a class date after you geezers medical out and no one else wants this job.

Captain Tony 04-10-2013 05:53 AM


Originally Posted by Bucking Bar (Post 1387978)

Why not just admit these guys have a point? The conditions and benefits of their employment were unilaterally changed without their negotiation or consent. If the same thing happened to us, we would be upset and might try to get it changed, just like they are doing.

Glad you get it. I'm sorry if their guys get hurt in the process, but our management has told us they are powerless to change this. Do you have any better suggestions to get the attention of the decision makers at UAL and motivate them to fix it?

Captain Tony 04-10-2013 05:56 AM


Originally Posted by Slats (Post 1387999)
No, I am not saying do nothing... Call your ALPA rep, talk to the chief, travel dept ect.... But retaliating against UAL pilots for something they had no say in is just silly.
Blocking out late ect... Hurts the company you work for not UAL. If the performance numbers suck enough Gojetzzz is always there to under bid ya.
I hope this doesn't become the norm, and yes this new fee does hurt my commute as well. But I'll do what's in my power to help change it, already written emails ect.., but ultimately it's UALs decision and we all have to suck it up...

Again, our management repeatedly says they have no control over passes and washes their hands of it. Now what?

200Driver 04-10-2013 06:04 AM


Originally Posted by pitch mode (Post 1388043)
Furloughing to farm out to regional carriers only to have the furloughees work for the very mainline-regional that put them on the street confirms their confidence in their decisions.

I second this! This is why the race to the bottom will NEVER end and why this fee will work against regional pilots...:eek:

Bucking Bar 04-10-2013 06:05 AM


Originally Posted by Captain Tony (Post 1388049)
Glad you get it. I'm sorry if their guys get hurt in the process, but our management has told us they are powerless to change this. Do you have any better suggestions to get the attention of the decision makers at UAL and motivate them to fix it?

I've got nothing that you would not have already thought of.

Could a NMB complaint be made that this is a unilateral change in pay and working conditions and thus a violation of status quo? Might be a reach, but postage is cheap. I'd think ALPA would be the pilots' friend on this one. Resolution by acclimation at the next LEC meeting if the MEC does not find sufficient motivation on its own?

It has been my experience (although I do not understand how it works) that quite a few express employees get positive space when flights get tight at Delta. At the end of the day management does have an interest in seeing that pilots end up at the same place their airplane is. As stated in an earlier post, park an RJ on a first flight and the phone is going to start ringing somewhere.

With network and marketing playing musical RJ's every single month, no one can realistically expect a family to move around the country to keep up. Often these are very temporary assignments. No other business (aside from migrant farm workers) expects this of their employees. This is one area where I hope the new ATP rules will increase the value of the pilot to their employer.

Lambourne 04-10-2013 06:09 AM


Originally Posted by Captain Tony (Post 1388053)
Again, our management repeatedly says they have no control over passes and washes their hands of it. Now what?

If your management is saying they have NO control and they negotiate THE FFD contract with UAL, what makes you guys think denying UAL pilots the jumpseat will the arm of UAL management?

I suspect your management is only telling you they can't do anything. In most respects they are not willing to DO anything. And in return the lever you guys are choosing to employ is to kick off the UAL pilots and cost yourselves money and sabotage the operation. Talk about misguided agression.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:35 PM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands