![]() |
Originally Posted by RgrMurdock
(Post 1435530)
Management thinks pilots are paid too much money.
|
Originally Posted by meyers9163
(Post 1435559)
Sounds like the high and mighty Skywest types are about to learn about reality is. Hopefully they don't get too deep of cuts but sounds like pays about to take a cut and airplanes get bigger...... At the end of the day do the pilots have a leg to stand on at SKW? No union no contract means management can do whatever no?
Best of luck but I just don't see it. The 50 seat comment on this goes against what your pilots say on here that the E175 are growth. Sounds to be replacement in the long term. Nothing like seeing a pilot rooting for management to cut fellow pilots pay! Way to show support for our profession... no wonder the downward spiral continues! |
Originally Posted by What
(Post 1435774)
Is not cheering, mane of the folks at SKW believe that they are above the regional issues and will soon be getting smacked by the company just like the rest of us. It's the cool aid!
You're basing this "knowledge" on the hundreds of SKW pilots you know personally, or the handful on this message board?:rolleyes: |
Originally Posted by What
(Post 1435774)
Is not cheering, mane of the folks at SKW believe that they are above the regional issues and will soon be getting smacked by the company just like the rest of us. It's the cool aid!
|
Your point was that ALPA is the reason for their concessions. My only counter point is that if they were non-union, they would be worse off. Keep in mind the fact that the judge denied management's first attempt at abrogating the pinnacle pilots' contract. That is proof that they would have been worse off if they were non-union because they wouldn't even need the permission of a judge. As for non-union being worse off, yeah SkyWest is doing really bad right? |
Originally Posted by Paid2fly
(Post 1435950)
You're basing this "knowledge" on the hundreds of SKW pilots you know personally, or the handful on this message board?:rolleyes:
|
Originally Posted by Paid2fly
(Post 1435948)
Nothing like seeing a pilot rooting for management to cut fellow pilots pay! Way to show support for our profession... no wonder the downward spiral continues!
Wasn't it Skywest who had an ugly change in their insurance a few years back? High deductible plan forced on them or something? If there's a binding agreement how did this change occur? |
And don't forget the Stock Purchase plan, and perpetual massaging of the performance rewards numbers.
|
Originally Posted by ShyGuy
(Post 1435952)
Originally Posted by What
(Post 1435774)
Is not cheering, mane of the folks at SKW believe that they are above the regional issues and will soon be getting smacked by the company just like the rest of us. It's the cool aid!
Originally Posted by ShyGuy
(Post 1435958)
Your point was that ALPA is the reason for their concessions. My only counter point is that if they were non-union, they would be worse off. Keep in mind the fact that the judge denied management's first attempt at abrogating the pinnacle pilots' contract. That is proof that they would have been worse off if they were non-union because they wouldn't even need the permission of a judge. As for non-union being worse off, yeah SkyWest is doing really bad right? |
Nevets the whole fact that you (who work at a different carrier) post on here a message from SAPA to SkyWest pilots all in an attempt to stir the pot of ridicule signals to me that you are a major troll.
SkyWest pilots wont get concessions. I expect management to ask for cuts just as much as I expect pilots to ask for raises. The only negotiating ploy they are throwing out there is whether we "grow" is up to the pilot group, because Mesa/Pinnacle are competing with us and have some low-ball offers. We don't really see it as "up to us" to secure new flying, but thats beside the point. We all see this as a tactic of starting the bidding low, as an attempt to avoid giving pay increases. If management gets cuts, they will be ecstatic, but I really think their expectations are to keep compensation where its at. Because management knows we dont require cuts. It would help make us more competitive, sure, but they know they dont have a strong case. We are profitable, have been profitable, the company just ordered 11 billion on new jets, has loads of cash in the bank, in the last year secured several new RFPs, etc. Its also possible that we delay negotiations until next year after the rest rules begin, so we can better see how this will affect everything. But for now having new aircraft = growth in the coming years is the sole carrot their dangling. On our company discussion board EVERYONE could careless about growth if it means we have to sacrifice personally for it. This isn't 2008, movement is coming to the entire industry. Will there be a shortage? Debatable, but there will be movement almost everywhere. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:58 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands