Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Turbo-Prop Training

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-30-2013 | 08:19 AM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Default Turbo-Prop Regional Training

Just wondering if anyone can shed some wisdom about the difficulty of training for a Turbo-Prop regional program (e.g., Piedmont) vs typical regional jets. I like the fact that Piedmont's aircraft appear to be primarily the old 6-pack configuration and not glass cockpit. Having no experience in the newer glass cockpits, I'm wondering if training would be a bit easier.
Reply
Old 06-30-2013 | 09:19 AM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 622
Likes: 0
From: PNF
Default

Glass is not a big issue. It only takes most people a couple of sims to figure it out. A little out of your comfort zone, but you have to adapt to survive.

Just go to the regional that you want to live in base at.
Reply
Old 06-30-2013 | 09:30 AM
  #3  
Thread Starter
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Default Turbo-Prop Training

Just wondering if anyone can shed some wisdom about the difficulty of training for a Turbo-Prop regional program (e.g., Piedmont) vs typical regional jets. I like the fact that Piedmont's aircraft appear to be primarily the old 6-pack configuration and not glass cockpit. Having no experience in the newer glass cockpits, I'm wondering if training would be a bit easier.
Reply
Old 06-30-2013 | 09:38 AM
  #4  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Default

The most difficult part to get used to would probably be the Flows, Callouts, Automation, and the CRM, jet or prop. Transitioning to glass is not too bad. I only flew steam gauges before my current job and transitioned to glass fairly easily. Its definitely easier than doing it the other way around.
Reply
Old 06-30-2013 | 09:52 AM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 853
Likes: 0
Default

Im not sure but I'd guess its really easy. I mean its not even a jet.
Reply
Old 06-30-2013 | 10:07 AM
  #6  
Line Holder
 
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 1,271
Likes: 0
From: The Parlor
Default

Turbo prop training is alot more difficult than any RJ training. Heard PDT is pretty up there in difficulty too, but have no experience in their training.
Reply
Old 06-30-2013 | 10:07 AM
  #7  
Line Holder
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 258
Likes: 0
Default

If your going to PDT prepare to encounter a training department that could care less about your career. If you say the wrong thing or even look the wrong way at JK, MM, or JP they will find a way to get rid of you even if you are performing well.

BTW don't expect training to be any easier just because its a prop. Most of the guys that have left for jet jobs have commented on the fact that systems wise the prop is a harder airplane to learn.
Reply
Old 06-30-2013 | 10:24 AM
  #8  
FlyJSH's Avatar
Day puke
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,865
Likes: 0
From: Out.
Default

For me, having a six pack, no FMS or other whizz-bang stuff, it was easier to make the transition from 135 single pilot to 121. YMMV
Reply
Old 06-30-2013 | 10:50 AM
  #9  
Works Every Weekend
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,210
Likes: 0
Default

The reality is that most turboprops are either more complex or require much more hands-babysitting than an RJ.
Reply
Old 06-30-2013 | 11:06 AM
  #10  
Saabs's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 2,450
Likes: 0
From: Airbus button pusher
Default

Props are from boats
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
KennyG1700
Flight Schools and Training
40
08-01-2019 12:53 AM
iflyatnite
Cargo
75
05-03-2010 07:13 AM
Dahlysia
Cargo
4
12-24-2009 08:28 PM
ChillBillPilot
Major
32
10-09-2008 04:35 PM
MaydayMark
Cargo
8
08-30-2007 06:59 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices