Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Regional (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/regional/)
-   -   New AA Regional Aircraft Order (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/regional/75788-new-aa-regional-aircraft-order.html)

spuzzyair 07-04-2013 05:04 PM

I am going to guess it would be the ERJ175... I bet they can come up with some agreement with Embraer to return 145's for 175's... but that also doesn't necessarily mean that Eagle will operate them. Republic has problems staffing its already scheduled Eagle flying so that would leave Skywest and Compass.

FlyingKat 07-04-2013 06:27 PM


Originally Posted by ShyGuy (Post 1439410)
A wholly owned Delta carrier will not be operating for another mainline carrier. That has never happened when Delta owns the regional. As long as Delta owns Endeavor, it will be DCI only.

Uhhh wrong answer. While owned by Mother Delta Comair bid on flying for other carriers and Comair/Regional Elite permformed underwing services for other carriers. Presently DGS performs underwing for other carriers.

spuzzyair 07-04-2013 06:35 PM


Originally Posted by FlyingKat (Post 1439468)
Uhhh wrong answer. While owned by Mother Delta Comair bid on flying for other carriers and Comair/Regional Elite permformed underwing services for other carriers. Presently DGS performs underwing for other carriers.

Ground handling and operating are two different animals.

While Comair did bid on other flying, it never materialized. However, I do not seen 9E operating for anyone other than Delta. They need to get their own house in order, and better their performance before they even begin to think of shifting their focus to operating for someone else.

FlyingKat 07-04-2013 06:40 PM


Originally Posted by ShyGuy (Post 1439432)
Consider past history with Pinnacle and Delta. Delta cut the payment due to Pinnacle because they didn't want to pay for the United side of things. While Delta may contract below wing services to other airlines, I don't think you'll see Endeavor fly as AA/UA or any other airline's regional.

The big issue with Pinnacle was due to the new contract and integration of Mesaba. Delta agreed to pay the costs of training pilots created by this integration. However Delta balked when they discovered this included training pilots to staff United flying. Further Trenary underbid both the United and original Pinnacle 900 flying. Both operations were marginal at best and were ditched in bankruptcy. The decision to get rid of the United flying was an economical decision (just like the Delta Pinnacle 900 flying) and had nothing to do with Delta's interest in keeping Pinnacle from flying for anybody else.

I think you will see Endeavor Air do anything that makes operational and economic sense and increases the value of the company to make it more attractive to investors when the time comes for Delta to sell it off.

Hijack now over.....

ShyGuy 07-04-2013 06:57 PM

Yes, over and under wing services. Delta won't allow a wholly owned airline to fly as a regional for another legacy. Most nearly all wholly owned regionals fly only for their own legacy mothership and no one else. Eagle, PSA, Piedmont, Endeavor, etc

ShyGuy 07-04-2013 06:59 PM

Who is gonna want to buy a regional when the model is broke and dying industry wide? Good licking getting new ATP rated pilots to show up for 23 grand a year. You'd be an idiot to buy a regional. It's no longer worth it. FFD profit contracts are all going away. The regional will have to deal with the bulk of all it's expenses.

meyers9163 07-04-2013 07:21 PM

Parker isn't buying planes for a non wholly own to fly. He's a pay to play CEO. AE is my guess. Get a bunch of 145s gone for 175s or 900s.

Doubt it's any other regional but a wholly owned based on Parkers history. Hell look at RAH. AA isn't buying 175s for them. Just my guess but AE is my guess.

FlyingKat 07-04-2013 07:23 PM


Originally Posted by ShyGuy (Post 1439483)
Yes, over and under wing services. Delta won't allow a wholly owned airline to fly as a regional for another legacy. Most nearly all wholly owned regionals fly only for their own legacy mothership and no one else. Eagle, PSA, Piedmont, Endeavor, etc

Shy this same Delta management team allowed Comair (while it was wholly owned by Delta) to bid on RFPs for other airlines while they were owned by Delta. I don't know how to make it any plainer than that for you. Eagle at one time operated codeshares for Northwest on the west coast. If it makes money, they'll do it.

FlyingKat 07-04-2013 07:30 PM


Originally Posted by ShyGuy (Post 1439485)
Who is gonna want to buy a regional when the model is broke and dying industry wide? Good licking getting new ATP rated pilots to show up for 23 grand a year. You'd be an idiot to buy a regional. It's no longer worth it. FFD profit contracts are all going away. The regional will have to deal with the bulk of all it's expenses.

You can say the same thing for the entire industry but people still invest in it and buy companies. FFD makes the mainlines more money than revenue sharing. That is why the entire industry went FFD in the late 90s. Any industry analyst worth his salt will tell you there is going to be lot of consolidation of companies and certificates over the next five years.

DL31082 07-04-2013 07:48 PM


Originally Posted by FlyingKat (Post 1439475)
The big issue with Pinnacle was due to the new contract and integration of Mesaba. Delta agreed to pay the costs of training pilots created by this integration. However Delta balked when they discovered this included training pilots to staff United flying. Further Trenary underbid both the United and original Pinnacle 900 flying. Both operations were marginal at best and were ditched in bankruptcy. The decision to get rid of the United flying was an economical decision (just like the Delta Pinnacle 900 flying) and had nothing to do with Delta's interest in keeping Pinnacle from flying for anybody else.

I think you will see Endeavor Air do anything that makes operational and economic sense and increases the value of the company to make it more attractive to investors when the time comes for Delta to sell it off.

Hijack now over.....

What's not stated in this argument was United was renegotiating the Q400 contract to make it profitable. Delta's DIP financing demands, and they were demands stated they had to exit the United flying. Without that the contract would have been renegotiated and the would probably still be flying at Pinnacle.

FlyingKat 07-04-2013 08:01 PM


Originally Posted by DL31082 (Post 1439522)
What's not stated in this argument was United was renegotiating the Q400 contract to make it profitable. Delta's DIP financing demands, and they were demands stated they had to exit the United flying. Without that the contract would have been renegotiated and the would probably still be flying at Pinnacle.

Probably not because even though UAL was willing to negotiate a new price, the cost of running the Qs on a seperate certificate under the new contract created enormous training costs and training events that made the operation marginal. The Qs came in under the old Continental scope, and until UAL had new joint scope they could not be on the same certificate as the CRJ 900s. Any way you look at it the Q operation was a financial disaster, and Delta very rightly refused to invest money in an operation that had no prayer of being financially viable.

Saabs 07-04-2013 09:08 PM


Originally Posted by FlyingKat (Post 1439529)
Probably not because even though UAL was willing to negotiate a new price, the cost of running the Qs on a seperate certificate under the new contract created enormous training costs and training events that made the operation marginal. The Qs came in under the old Continental scope, and until UAL had new joint scope they could not be on the same certificate as the CRJ 900s. Any way you look at it the Q operation was a financial disaster, and Delta very rightly refused to invest money in an operation that had no prayer of being financially viable.

U

R

Clue

Less

FlyingKat 07-04-2013 09:50 PM


Originally Posted by Saabs (Post 1439552)
U

R

Clue

Less

Nope just spent my time in hell at PCL while that mess was going on.

ShyGuy 07-04-2013 10:41 PM


Originally Posted by FlyingKat (Post 1439499)
Shy this same Delta management team allowed Comair (while it was wholly owned by Delta) to bid on RFPs for other airlines while they were owned by Delta. I don't know how to make it any plainer than that for you. Eagle at one time operated codeshares for Northwest on the west coast. If it makes money, they'll do it.

Delta allowed Comair to RFP to string the Comair pilots along on hope and faith. Delta never intended for a wholly owned Comair to get flying for other legacy airlines. Comair pilots had a history of "just sign this or accept this, and gasp, new RFPs and new planes!"


You can say the same thing for the entire industry but people still invest in it and buy companies. FFD makes the mainlines more money than revenue sharing. That is why the entire industry went FFD in the late 90s. Any industry analyst worth his salt will tell you there is going to be lot of consolidation of companies and certificates over the next five years.
FFDs in the regional industry is a dying model. The mainline is going to expose the regional to more costs than before. The regionals are no longer what they were meant to be, a cheap labor force that had constant movement. Now everyone at the regionals is basically topped out, 8-12+ year CAs and lots of 6+ year FOs. Long run, this high labor cost and FFD model is not sustainable. Delta is taking the first step at fixing it and the most proactive of the legacies. 5 years from now, regionals will start to disappear and many regional flights will be done by the 717 at Delta. The regionals will also not be able to get ATP rated pilots for only 23 grand a year. The only way to attract an already short pool of regional applicants is to offer more pay, and it will come to a breaking point where a regional just can't do it at a lower cost than a major. There will be more industry consolidation in the next 5 years, but the regionals will shrink in pilot numbers over that time.

embraer 07-04-2013 10:45 PM

Six pages and only a couple of posts that have anything to do with the original topic.

APC has become just one big wild west show. No Sheriffs in town from the looks of it. Otherwise the hammer would have come down a long time ago in this thread. It is the same couple of posters who keep drifting it.

ShyGuy 07-04-2013 11:20 PM

Sorry, what did you want to hear? More regional aircraft and less mainline jobs? Because that is what's happening when AA buys E175/190s for regional airlines.

FlyingKat 07-05-2013 01:06 AM


Originally Posted by ShyGuy (Post 1439570)
Delta allowed Comair to RFP to string the Comair pilots along on hope and faith. Delta never intended for a wholly owned Comair to get flying for other legacy airlines. Comair pilots had a history of "just sign this or accept this, and gasp, new RFPs and new planes!"

At least now you admit you were wrong and DL management allowed a wholly owned subsidary to bid on flying outside of Delta. But you go off the reservation again when you claim that somehow, if United has awarded Comair flying that Delta was going to change their mind. Geez Shy do you know ridiculous this sounds?



Originally Posted by ShyGuy (Post 1439570)
FFDs in the regional industry is a dying model. The mainline is going to expose the regional to more costs than before. The regionals are no longer what they were meant to be, a cheap labor force that had constant movement. Now everyone at the regionals is basically topped out, 8-12+ year CAs and lots of 6+ year FOs. Long run, this high labor cost and FFD model is not sustainable. Delta is taking the first step at fixing it and the most proactive of the legacies. 5 years from now, regionals will start to disappear and many regional flights will be done by the 717 at Delta. The regionals will also not be able to get ATP rated pilots for only 23 grand a year. The only way to attract an already short pool of regional applicants is to offer more pay, and it will come to a breaking point where a regional just can't do it at a lower cost than a major. There will be more industry consolidation in the next 5 years, but the regionals will shrink in pilot numbers over that time.


Shy you're crazy. Regionals would love to go back to the revenue sharing model. They were raking in the cash under this model in the late 90s. FFD was created because mainlines were unhappy with spending all the money on marketing and allowing regionals to piggyback with little expense. The only routes mainline is interested in revenue sharing are EAS routes that have very low load factors. The last 3 major RFP awards (Republic/Eagle, Trans States/United, and Delta/Pinnacle) were all capacity purchase agreements.

We'll see if the pilot shortage pushes more flying up to mainline. I'm not sold on the shortage yet, but the indications are it may be happening.

ShyGuy 07-05-2013 01:17 AM

A wholly owned regional will not fly for another legacy airline. If it spins off, then all bets are off. There's hardly any past precedence.

Bartok 07-05-2013 04:06 AM


Originally Posted by FlyingKat (Post 1439499)
Shy this same Delta management team allowed Comair (while it was wholly owned by Delta) to bid on RFPs for other airlines while they were owned by Delta. I don't know how to make it any plainer than that for you. Eagle at one time operated codeshares for Northwest on the west coast. If it makes money, they'll do it.

And Mesaba flew for USAir while being wholly owned by Delta also.

bradeku1008 07-05-2013 04:39 AM


Originally Posted by fullflank (Post 1439377)
Not going to come to PSA. Here is why I think that: PSA doesn't have the infrastructure for growth. We have one Sim that runs 24hrs/day to accommodate recurrent, new hire etc. They've been asking airways for another, no luck. The one guy who wanted growth, the VP, just passed away. If we get more 700/900's our pay will actually go up because of the blended rate. Parker is obviously trying to get labor to fly these things cheaper, not actually pay pilots more than now. All that, and I'm very confident in saying that PSA is not going to be considered for this flying.

All are good points. But don't rule out PSA getting some aircraft, if those new RJ's are 900's. All of our pilots are already typed on the aircraft, reducing training cost considerably for the pilots we will need to upgrade for the growth. Cost for hiring pilots off the street to replace the first officers that will be upgrading will remain the same. The training department is expanding. By September the downstairs in Dayton will be PSA's and it is set up to have large classes running at the same time. We could have upgrades, new hires, and flight attendant classes being conducted without the claustrophobic felling we have now. Yes we will need to have another sim for the 900 differences but it will probably be cheaper to send the pilots to Montreal for a 2 day sim session than it will be to buy one. Yes MZ did pass away but surprisingly KH is showing his face more and has made it clear that he knows PSA must grow with larger aircraft or we are all out of jobs. Last but not least PSA is cheap.

fullflank 07-05-2013 05:23 AM


Originally Posted by bradeku1008 (Post 1439610)
All are good points. But don't rule out PSA getting some aircraft, if those new RJ's are 900's. All of our pilots are already typed on the aircraft, reducing training cost considerably for the pilots we will need to upgrade for the growth. Cost for hiring pilots off the street to replace the first officers that will be upgrading will remain the same. The training department is expanding. By September the downstairs in Dayton will be PSA's and it is set up to have large classes running at the same time. We could have upgrades, new hires, and flight attendant classes being conducted without the claustrophobic felling we have now. Yes we will need to have another sim for the 900 differences but it will probably be cheaper to send the pilots to Montreal for a 2 day sim session than it will be to buy one. Yes MZ did pass away but surprisingly KH is showing his face more and has made it clear that he knows PSA must grow with larger aircraft or we are all out of jobs. Last but not least PSA is cheap.

You're right, psa needs to replace these 200's or we are out of a job. We are cheap its true. I think the corporation pays almost no tax being HQ in vendalia, and being a "job creator". Our mx hanger in Cak is essentially free. Investment is being made (expanding training center, cat II) but I just can't see Parker passing on a chance to whipsaw. If they are offered here, it will be for the deal that eagle is being offered now. In that event, I'd rather pass anyways.

PeopleMover90 07-05-2013 05:57 AM


Originally Posted by fullflank (Post 1439622)
You're right, psa needs to replace these 200's or we are out of a job. We are cheap its true. I think the corporation pays almost no tax being HQ in vendalia, and being a "job creator". Our mx hanger in Cak is essentially free. Investment is being made (expanding training center, cat II) but I just can't see Parker passing on a chance to whipsaw. If they are offered here, it will be for the deal that eagle is being offered now. In that event, I'd rather pass anyways.

While you say you'd rather pass, id rather be a part of a modernizing/expanding carrier and have a job then sit here and say NO NO NO! And watch PSA disappear or worse yet get merged with PDT that is a very senior company and see a bad QOL shift.... If offered 700/900s to replace the 200s and even add on a few airframes up to the point our pay doesn't go up (keeping us cheap) id be all for it. Sure, what's "deserved" and "proper" and only right for us is a different story.... If you're looking for correct compensation this is the wrong industry. We're way past the slave driver point. Screw it, might as well make it a secure slave driver job.

fullflank 07-05-2013 06:08 AM


Originally Posted by PeopleMover90 (Post 1439637)
While you say you'd rather pass, id rather be a part of a modernizing/expanding carrier and have a job then sit here and say NO NO NO! And watch PSA disappear or worse yet get merged with PDT that is a very senior company and see a bad QOL shift.... If offered 700/900s to replace the 200s and even add on a few airframes up to the point our pay doesn't go up (keeping us cheap) id be all for it. Sure, what's "deserved" and "proper" and only right for us is a different story.... If you're looking for correct compensation this is the wrong industry. We're way past the slave driver point. Screw it, might as well make it a secure slave driver job.

I really wish you didn't work here. You want security? RAH is hiring and offering bonuses, please go. It wouldn't be tough for you to start over, you've been here what? A year? You should go for it. Growing fleet and very secure.

flysooner9 07-05-2013 06:26 AM


Originally Posted by PeopleMover90 (Post 1439637)
While you say you'd rather pass, id rather be a part of a modernizing/expanding carrier and have a job then sit here and say NO NO NO! And watch PSA disappear or worse yet get merged with PDT that is a very senior company and see a bad QOL shift.... If offered 700/900s to replace the 200s and even add on a few airframes up to the point our pay doesn't go up (keeping us cheap) id be all for it. Sure, what's "deserved" and "proper" and only right for us is a different story.... If you're looking for correct compensation this is the wrong industry. We're way past the slave driver point. Screw it, might as well make it a secure slave driver job.

People like you who are wrecking this career. Bet you still live with mom and dad to.

PeopleMover90 07-05-2013 06:29 AM


Originally Posted by fullflank (Post 1439638)
I really wish you didn't work here. You want security? RAH is hiring and offering bonuses, please go. It wouldn't be tough for you to start over, you've been here what? A year? You should go for it. Growing fleet and very secure.

I have friends at RAH and wouldn't touch their working conditions with a 10 foot pole. Sounds like you have 170 fever...

And while you wish I didn't work here, I do. Thanks for the comradery... I never insulted you. Just added a slightly positive spin to something.

meyers9163 07-05-2013 06:31 AM

Been at PSA nearly 6 years..... Upgrade would be nice but I'd not say yes just to upgrade. Id rather start over or get out then lower a standard so I can get a quicker upgrade etc.....

fullflank 07-05-2013 06:35 AM


Originally Posted by PeopleMover90 (Post 1439649)
I have friends at RAH and wouldn't touch their working conditions with a 10 foot pole. Sounds like you have 170 fever...

And while you wish I didn't work here, I do. Thanks for the comradery... I never insulted you. Just added a slightly positive spin to something.

I'm not insulting you either. I've been here six years and in contract negotiations for most of them. We finally have a contract and some new FO is telling me we need to accept paycuts to grow. As nicely as I can say this, RAH has growth and security you seek, at cost you are obviously okay with (pay, workrules). I just don't want you having a vote here when Parker brings the eagle deal to psa, nothing personal.

PeopleMover90 07-05-2013 06:36 AM


Originally Posted by flysooner9 (Post 1439646)
People like you who are wrecking this career. Bet you still live with mom and dad to.

Cool your jets man... Seriously.

PeopleMover90 07-05-2013 06:37 AM


Originally Posted by fullflank (Post 1439652)
I'm not insulting you either. I've been here six years and in contract negotiations for most of them. We finally have a contract and some new FO is telling me we need to accept paycuts to grow. As nicely as I can say this, RAH has growth and security you seek, at cost you are obviously okay with (pay, workrules). I just don't want you having a vote here when Parker brings the eagle deal to psa, nothing personal.

I guess that's why it would be called...a vote?

wiz5422 07-05-2013 06:56 AM


Originally Posted by PeopleMover90 (Post 1439649)
I have friends at RAH and wouldn't touch their working conditions with a 10 foot pole. Sounds like you have 170 fever...

And while you wish I didn't work here, I do. Thanks for the comradery... I never insulted you. Just added a slightly positive spin to something.

Positive spin? give me a break. We don't need people like you in this industry. This is why we are in the situation that we are in, because to many people think like you! Help the profession, don't tear it down. This isn't a hobby for me it is my career!

fullflank 07-05-2013 07:32 AM


Originally Posted by PeopleMover90 (Post 1439659)
I guess that's why it would be called...a vote?

So why cast a vote that will help tear this place down? That place already exists, they're hiring, and they're offering signing bonuses. They have 47 modern airplane coming. In 2 years you'll be in a much better relative seniority position at RAH than you will be here. Psa upgrade is going to hit 7+ years soon.
Rah will only be coming down and fast. You should go for it seriously. Its your fastest route to a major.

PeopleMover90 07-05-2013 09:13 AM

Guys-

Just brought up a viewpoint. Fullflank thank you for keeping it conversational. I should clarify I wasn't so much thinking of us taking cuts as much as just adding onto what is and pay stays the same- sorry I wasn't clearer. I just want a balance of job security and realism.

We're all in this together whether we like it or not. I'm 10 years in on this business....it only gets worse every day.

crzipilot 07-05-2013 04:04 PM

So if the current 900's and 175's have 79 and 80 seats respectively, how many seats do you think these supposedly new RJ's are going to have?!?! Is Parker going to order bigger aircraft to put less seats than what he is flying in them now?

DL31082 07-05-2013 06:43 PM


Originally Posted by Bartok (Post 1439598)
And Mesaba flew for USAir while being wholly owned by Delta also.

The USAir flying was done after they were sold to Pinnacle.

Paid2fly 07-05-2013 09:42 PM


Originally Posted by PeopleMover90 (Post 1439655)
Cool your jets man... Seriously.








Flysooner is absolutely right! "Cool your own jets man... Seriously!!":rolleyes:

Bartok 07-06-2013 05:21 AM


Originally Posted by DL31082 (Post 1439946)
The USAir flying was done after they were sold to Pinnacle.

Ahh, you're right.

It's starting to get jumbled in my head, lol.

grahamlax 07-11-2013 09:15 PM

is this for real?

?New? AA Management Ties RJ Buy to More Cost Concessions at Regionals | Aviation International News


I mean: can anyone confirm that Parker actually said this?

ERJF15 07-11-2013 09:21 PM


Originally Posted by grahamlax (Post 1443569)

Well, that's what has been discussed. And yes, it's true.

Slats 07-12-2013 03:18 AM


Originally Posted by ERJF15 (Post 1443575)
Well, that's what has been discussed. And yes, it's true.

Thank Pinnacle for lowering the bar even further...

What 07-12-2013 06:51 AM


Originally Posted by Slats (Post 1443620)
Thank Pinnacle for lowering the bar even further...

I wouldn't throw stones at Pinnacle, your union representatives are contemplating and listening to management's request for a B Scale. If Eagle allows a B Scale it will impact the industry more than what Pinnacle did.

Pinnacle had an 1113 filled against them, their Union reps turned down the company's proposal and went to the judge, it was found that the company was asking for things it didn't need. Then Delta stepped in and said you either accept this or we will liquidate you.

Eagle never had an 1113 filled against us, we took the first offer and the union spun it as a great accomplishment, they sold the idea of a furlough protection being as good as having a plan for the airline and 3 out 4 pilots who voted accepted the offer.

The Eagle pilot group is weak and haven't stood their ground. The union leadership and the members roll over every time.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:58 PM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands