The Role of Regional Airlines
#11
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,459
Likes: 0
No idea. All I know is that in 1989 SWA pilots were telling me they would never make as much as a Legacy pilot but they were happy. 20 years later, and with the gutting that I understand the legacies took in their contracts SWA pits are some of the highest paid in the industry?
Is it more likely that SWA jacked up pay or that other companies cut pay?
Jenny pays Johnny $20 to sweep out her garage.
Sarah only pays Jimmy $10.
After 6 months, Sarah cuts Johnny's pay to $8.
Jimmy is now the highest paid garage sweeper in the neighborhood.
This is what I've heard. Is it true? Somewhat true?
It seems John Carr's post makes sense.
Is it more likely that SWA jacked up pay or that other companies cut pay?
Jenny pays Johnny $20 to sweep out her garage.
Sarah only pays Jimmy $10.
After 6 months, Sarah cuts Johnny's pay to $8.
Jimmy is now the highest paid garage sweeper in the neighborhood.
This is what I've heard. Is it true? Somewhat true?
It seems John Carr's post makes sense.
Yes, I totally agree with John Carr regarding what the market will bear, but it seems like pilot contracts have a frustrating lag time to find equilibrium with the true market. Heck by the time a good-times one is ratified, it's already the bad times and vice versa.
#12
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 320
Likes: 0
From: Auto
I'd consider that to be a valid statement.
But the argument could be made that UAL and DAL's pre 9/11 compensation levels weren't sustainable. AA and NW were next in line for contracts. USAir used a "parity +" method. Even before 9/11, UAL's CFO was quoted that with downturn the economy was taking in 2001 that they'd be "getting some of that money back". Meaning, UAL would probably be asking for concessions down the road.
The new DAL and UAL pay rates aren't much more than their concessionary pay scales adjusted for inflation. And they pale in comparison to pre 9/11 numbers.
But I'd say sulkair's post pretty much summed it up in a nut shell. And ALPA national/Lee Moak's stance ISN'T going to help any.
But the argument could be made that UAL and DAL's pre 9/11 compensation levels weren't sustainable. AA and NW were next in line for contracts. USAir used a "parity +" method. Even before 9/11, UAL's CFO was quoted that with downturn the economy was taking in 2001 that they'd be "getting some of that money back". Meaning, UAL would probably be asking for concessions down the road.
The new DAL and UAL pay rates aren't much more than their concessionary pay scales adjusted for inflation. And they pale in comparison to pre 9/11 numbers.
But I'd say sulkair's post pretty much summed it up in a nut shell. And ALPA national/Lee Moak's stance ISN'T going to help any.
#13
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 5,282
Likes: 101
I would NEVER argue that executive compensation is TOO much. But another reality is that "you get what you negotiate". When it comes to pilot pay and negotiations, pilots can usually only play checkers while management gets to play chess. And again, I DON'T like it.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post




