Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
The Role of Regional Airlines >

The Role of Regional Airlines

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

The Role of Regional Airlines

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-19-2013 | 02:21 PM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,459
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by USMCFLYR
No idea. All I know is that in 1989 SWA pilots were telling me they would never make as much as a Legacy pilot but they were happy. 20 years later, and with the gutting that I understand the legacies took in their contracts SWA pits are some of the highest paid in the industry?
Is it more likely that SWA jacked up pay or that other companies cut pay?

Jenny pays Johnny $20 to sweep out her garage.
Sarah only pays Jimmy $10.

After 6 months, Sarah cuts Johnny's pay to $8.
Jimmy is now the highest paid garage sweeper in the neighborhood.

This is what I've heard. Is it true? Somewhat true?
It seems John Carr's post makes sense.
Ok, I get it now - I was reading too far into what you were trying to say. Haha! Thanks guys!

Yes, I totally agree with John Carr regarding what the market will bear, but it seems like pilot contracts have a frustrating lag time to find equilibrium with the true market. Heck by the time a good-times one is ratified, it's already the bad times and vice versa.
Reply
Old 10-19-2013 | 02:53 PM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 320
Likes: 0
From: Auto
Default

Originally Posted by John Carr
I'd consider that to be a valid statement.

But the argument could be made that UAL and DAL's pre 9/11 compensation levels weren't sustainable. AA and NW were next in line for contracts. USAir used a "parity +" method. Even before 9/11, UAL's CFO was quoted that with downturn the economy was taking in 2001 that they'd be "getting some of that money back". Meaning, UAL would probably be asking for concessions down the road.

The new DAL and UAL pay rates aren't much more than their concessionary pay scales adjusted for inflation. And they pale in comparison to pre 9/11 numbers.

But I'd say sulkair's post pretty much summed it up in a nut shell. And ALPA national/Lee Moak's stance ISN'T going to help any.
I would argue that executive compensation industry wide is unsustainable.
Reply
Old 10-19-2013 | 03:16 PM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 5,282
Likes: 101
Default

Originally Posted by sulkair
pilot contracts have a frustrating lag time to find equilibrium with the true market. Heck by the time a good-times one is ratified, it's already the bad times and vice versa.
True. But along the lines of other posts in this thread, meaning being summed up in a nutshell, it's the RLA that affects that process the most.

Originally Posted by GlobeTreker
I would argue that executive compensation industry wide is unsustainable.
I would argue that the sad reality is that it IS sustainable in the corporate American/Wall Street Driven/Shareholder value orientated style. But make no mistake, I DON'T like it.

I would NEVER argue that executive compensation is TOO much. But another reality is that "you get what you negotiate". When it comes to pilot pay and negotiations, pilots can usually only play checkers while management gets to play chess. And again, I DON'T like it.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
aafurloughee
Fractional
41
06-25-2008 06:43 PM
papacharlie
Regional
39
01-27-2008 05:01 PM
AFPirate
Regional
6
11-26-2007 11:39 AM
jelloy683
Major
4
08-13-2007 05:24 PM
redbaron84
Major
1
12-25-2005 09:49 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices