Consequences of RAH passing this abortion.
 

It would clearly be a huge setback in the movement we've all been waiting for. Beyond that, it takes away their opportunity to properly attract new talent rendering them poorly staffed for years to come. No new hires, no growth. What's their reasoning? Are the margins really this thin that they can't afford to pays us a fair livable wage?
You will not have another opportunity like this for many years to come. Vote no.

Thanks for starting a brand new thread for this. It really contributes a lot to the discussion that couldn't have been in one of the 3 other RAH threads on the front page.

Edit: I agree with you, for the record.

Are you going to start an idiotic thread like this EVERY TIME any airline is in negotiations? Or are you trying to get your post count up to win a prize? Honestly someone who starts as many posts like this has some hidden guilt somewhere for voting yes and is trying to cover it up.

CONCESSIONS ARE SO IN RIGHT NOW!

Like seriously guise!

Agreed. NoLightOff, you get my vote of TOTD.

What do you reasonably expect from a ta that you would not consider an abortion?

This is a serious question.

I want to know the answer to this too.

Nah...they just work for ALPA and are trying to figure out how to explain to their regionals why they can't get them anything but concessions...Moak is praying this fails, otherwise he has a lot of 'splaning to do.

When is the vote? Just curious...

I'll have a go....

- Leg-by-leg cancellation pay.
- 4:1 and 2:1 trip and duty rigs.
- Hourly rate equal to Horizon, if not better.
- Some sort of Schedule Adjustment Process. (SAP)
- Sizeable signing bonus or some quantity of retroactive pay.
- No language about line-holders being contactable the entire trip.



I would consider these things to be part of an "industry standard" contract.