![]() |
I started to explain something to you DENPilot. But decided not to. it may not be your background as you think, but I point towards something else. I'm not gna explain anything else publicly.
|
Originally Posted by ClarenceOver
(Post 1615405)
Military yes because there is a higher standard. Law enforcement.......yeah not so much.
Conversely, there are also PLENTY of civilians who have undergone as much firearms training as an Army Ranger. So let's keep the hasty generalizations to a minimum, mmkay? |
Originally Posted by Ultralight
(Post 1615233)
Anyone with no prior military or law enforcement experience should automatically be rejected in my opinion. Too many needle d!cks signing up for a badge and a gun for the wrong reasons.
For what its worth, most of the FFDO's I know should never have been accepted into the program, and those that should were denied. |
Originally Posted by WHACKMASTER
(Post 1615504)
You sir are a complete baffoon.
Stay classy tough guy. |
Originally Posted by rickair7777
(Post 1615401)
Operationally that's ludicrous...you bring your own weapon or you don't go. You don't start an op on the premise that you're going to take a gun away from an armed LEO. You've been watching way too many Hollywood movies.
It is a very cheap and effective way to complicate bad-guy planning...it's a big unknown for them. This is anti-terrorism 101, nothing too hard or secret. The TSA hates it for the same reason the active duty military services hate reserves, and regular cops hate part-time volunteer cops...job security. How to tell a PROFESSIONAL FFDO? You don't know he's an FFDO, that's how. The rest are a liability. Idiot, baffoon, ignorant, whatever. Grow up! |
Wow, this spiraled down quickly. A few good posts that I got a good laugh out of.
I really don't get it, I was just trying to understand. The truth is that the TSA "screening" us for carrying a firearm in the flight deck, is completely ludicrous. Every single one of has the ability to commit unimaginable acts without the use of a firearm. That's why this screening process is odd. Not saying to give any Joe Pilot a gun, but if someone is sincere in their intent, has the right attitude, and can safely pass a training course, I don't see the issue. |
Originally Posted by rickair7777
(Post 1615401)
regular cops hate part-time volunteer cops...job security.
|
Originally Posted by DENpilot
(Post 1615567)
Wow, this spiraled down quickly. A few good posts that I got a good laugh out of.
I really don't get it, I was just trying to understand. The truth is that the TSA "screening" us for carrying a firearm in the flight deck, is completely ludicrous. Every single one of has the ability to commit unimaginable acts without the use of a firearm. That's why this screening process is odd. Not saying to give any Joe Pilot a gun, but if someone is sincere in their intent, has the right attitude, and can safely pass a training course, I don't see the issue. Bad DEN, bad! |
Originally Posted by vilcas
(Post 1615443)
When people sign up for FFDO they are taking on an enormous responsibility. I hope these pilots bear this in mind and keep themselves operational ready. The readiness that I am referring too comes with constant training the way the special forces do. I don't think most FFDO pilots do this and shouldn't continue to serve in that capacity. More federal air marshals that makes more sense.
|
Originally Posted by Blackwing
(Post 1615503)
Conversely, there are also PLENTY of civilians who have undergone as much firearms training as an Army Ranger.
My experience with firearms has been limited to my law enforcement training and that's about it. I couldn't imagine someone/company taking on the liability of training civilians to those standards. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:21 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands