Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Decisions, Decisions!

Old 04-24-2014 | 09:40 PM
  #21  
80ktsClamp's Avatar
Da Hudge
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 17,473
Likes: 0
From: Poodle Whisperer
Default

Originally Posted by Boomer
First, welcome to APC.

Second, your logic is valid. I shared your conclusions back in 2003 and went with Comair. 10 years... Never upgraded. You don't want to see the math on how that decision got me ahead of my peer group.

Third, I would agree with previous posters. The regional you don't have to commute for is the best regional... Period.

And if they don't have a s#it-ton of 50-seaters sitting around, better still.

Fourth, the difference between Vegas and the regionals is your odds are better in Vegas. (But that's improving)

Good luck!
Bingo. Upgrade time and growth/movement had better be an important consideration. I didn't even apply to comair in 2003 when I was shopping for regionals because I was concerned about getting stuck as an FO for a long time.

Spending 10 years as an FO at a "good" QOL regional < 1 year as FO at a somewhat jankier place and a couple years as captain before moving on to a career carrier.
Old 04-25-2014 | 06:55 AM
  #22  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 492
Likes: 0
From: Cloud surfing
Default

Originally Posted by Salukipilot4590
U wot M8?



Not gonna lie, this is legit advice
What does this mean "U wot M8?"
English please!

No, Mesa, No Republic, No Silver, No XJT, No SKW, No Envoy, No Gojets, No TSA, No...No No No any regional! Where does one start then?
Old 04-25-2014 | 07:04 AM
  #23  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,648
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
Bingo. Upgrade time and growth/movement had better be an important consideration. I didn't even apply to comair in 2003 when I was shopping for regionals because I was concerned about getting stuck as an FO for a long time.

Spending 10 years as an FO at a "good" QOL regional < 1 year as FO at a somewhat jankier place and a couple years as captain before moving on to a career carrier.
The only pitfall there is upgrades can be very hard to predict. Most "quick" upgrades affect those on property already. Guys trying to hop on for the upgrade run the risk of getting stuck as a FO at a garbage regional for an extended period of time.

This may not really apply anymore considering the regional model is going to change drastically in the next few years, but it's something to think about.
Old 04-25-2014 | 07:32 AM
  #24  
crazyjaydawg's Avatar
Line Holder
10M Airline Miles
15 Years
50 Countries Visited
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,285
Likes: 41
From: Middle Seat
Default

Originally Posted by BaronRouge380
What does this mean "U wot M8?"
English please!

No, Mesa, No Republic, No Silver, No XJT, No SKW, No Envoy, No Gojets, No TSA, No...No No No any regional! Where does one start then?
Compass?

I guess Great Lakes hasn't been mentioned yet either...
Old 04-25-2014 | 08:18 AM
  #25  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 1,272
Likes: 0
From: Another RJ FO
Default

Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
Spending 10 years as an FO at a "good" QOL regional < 1 year as FO at a somewhat jankier place and a couple years as captain before moving on to a career carrier.
In the last 5 years what majors have been hiring people who have only spent a couple of years at the regionals? That used to be true but it just isn't true anymore. Now that the majors are hiring it won't matter if someone hired in 2005 upgraded in a year, or was hired in 2005 and took until 2013 to upgrade. Both of those pilots are still stuck at the regionals and both of those pilots have the PIC time.
Old 04-25-2014 | 08:41 AM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 492
Likes: 0
From: Cloud surfing
Default

Originally Posted by rcfd13
In the last 5 years what majors have been hiring people who have only spent a couple of years at the regionals? That used to be true but it just isn't true anymore. Now that the majors are hiring it won't matter if someone hired in 2005 upgraded in a year, or was hired in 2005 and took until 2013 to upgrade. Both of those pilots are still stuck at the regionals and both of those pilots have the PIC time.
deleted...
Old 04-25-2014 | 08:43 AM
  #27  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 492
Likes: 0
From: Cloud surfing
Default

Originally Posted by crazyjaydawg
Compass?

I guess Great Lakes hasn't been mentioned yet either...
Great Lakes, no I do not want to make the great mistake!
Compass? Would be great but I am not qualified for them.
I talked to the recruiters at a job fair, they pretty much said :"great education, but you have no prior 121 or 135 experience. Go get a few hundred hours on a King Air and come back". I thanked them and left almost embarassed for even trying to talk to them.
Old 04-25-2014 | 08:52 AM
  #28  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 112
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by BaronRouge380
Great Lakes, no I do not want to make the great mistake!
Compass? Would be great but I am not qualified for them.
I talked to the recruiters at a job fair, they pretty much said :"great education, but you have no prior 121 or 135 experience. Go get a few hundred hours on a King Air and come back". I thanked them and left almost embarassed for even trying to talk to them.

Compass told you that?
Old 04-25-2014 | 08:53 AM
  #29  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 492
Likes: 0
From: Cloud surfing
Default

Originally Posted by lowtimepilot
Compass told you that?
Yes, I am very serious. That is exactly what one of the recruiters said.
Looks like they don't want 1500 h guys, they want people with prior 121/135 to fly their shiney 175s for peanuts.
I don't even remember if I left my resume or taken it back with the embarrassment!
Old 04-25-2014 | 09:43 AM
  #30  
Thread Starter
On Reserve
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 122
Likes: 0
Default

Many thanks for all the participation! There is a lot of good information coming out and I am learning a lot. Let's keep it up!

The most recurring themes involve commuting and upgrades. Shortest commute implies less stress and better rest. We all know (should know) the irrefutable importance of that. The upgrade subject remains a crap shoot. I have come to understand and believe that stated upgrade time is based on the current moment and could change one way or the other in a matter of months. Ref what pete2800 stated about the upgrade time at his company changing 3 years in 4 months, that's a significant change and I don't think he meant 3 years -less-. Ref also Bzzt stating that quick upgrade time applying mostly to those already on property; a very profound point. I wish it could be better projected as I do agree with 80KtsClamp about being at a lesser regional and becoming CA quicker vs a greater regional and remaining an FO longer. To me, CA pay anywhere would more than meet my current and near future needs and would be worth -nearly- any hardship (emphasis on nearly lol).

So far I've gotten offers from Mesa, TSA, AirWis, XJT, and RAH. I live in the southeast, so I'm leaning towards either XJT or TSA. XJT due to company size, decent pay and best commute, TSA due to upgrade time, decent commute, and relatively decent pay if the upgrade dosen't come as quick as stated. Mesa's upgrade sounds good too, but they seem to have a rocky reputation and their indecent pay speaks for itself. I held off on applying for Envoy, PSA and a few others so as to save some for later rather than rejecting possible interview invitations. I think it's possible that may not go over well if one decides to try back later. Any good info on these companies is more than welcome and will be very useful.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
9780991975808
Flight Schools and Training
0
10-12-2013 06:58 AM
hawgdriver
Military
16
02-10-2013 10:24 AM
Planespotta
Safety
2
09-22-2010 03:06 PM
ACEAV8R
Regional
9
06-04-2008 08:50 PM
kaptendiddy
ExpressJet
11
07-13-2007 07:28 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices