Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Regional (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/regional/)
-   -   ENY's incompetent MEC (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/regional/85128-enys-incompetent-mec.html)

stanherman 11-25-2014 07:52 PM

There is always the 10% of losers group out there who is emailing Sam Pool begging him to make a deal. Keep our jobs, **** the pay.

Sad way to live.

QuagmireGiggity 11-25-2014 09:33 PM


Originally Posted by publicphone (Post 1770654)
Well folks, I don't know why our MEC continues to hide specifics from you, but here are some more.

We begin transferring our CRJs to PSA in June of 2015.
We will park the remaining 38 EMB140s in 2015.
We will transfer 15 EMB145s to Trans States in 2015.
Then, we will transfer another 15 EMB145s to a yet unnamed airline in 2016.
We will transfer another 20 EMB145s to Piedmont, all in 2016.

That means that we will have gone from over 300 aircraft at the end of 2008 to 68 airplanes by the end of 2016. Additionally, the company disclosed a long time ago that with less than 70 aircraft on property, the flight department could not make a profit and would be liquidated.

So let's think this through. A few months ago, we had the opportunity to lock in 170 aircraft guarantee with NO wiggle room for management, despite Ray Igou's current lies about management having the ability to stop the flow or reduce the aircraft guarantee due to staffing. Not only was Ray Igou not there at the time, but his individual has already proven his gross inability to maintain any actual facts as was again proven on Council 121's teleconference.

So management is still offering a fleet guarantee, an enhanced flow, and relief on the 12/4 caps, should AA slow or stop its hiring. But our self-serving MEC continues to hide the ball.

Someone should please help me understand how your elected representatives have helped you. They have lost 40 aircraft from the fleet guarantee, they have lost most of the 145s, the have lost our CRJs and the promised 900s, they have lost all credibility with the APA, and they are jeopardizing the flow through for the rest of us.

Tell the MEC to put the proposal out for a vote and to get their self-serving personalities out of the way.

+1.
They screwed the pooch.
Can't believe people are dumb enough to follow these people.

diva 11-25-2014 10:08 PM

Even if it went out for vote it would be a NO !! We're prepared for a shutdown. We'll all have better jobs elsewhere. Go ahead. Were actually enjoying the show. Have us operate all 175's over at AA with 30K bonus each along with a AA seniority number and then we MIGHT consider it, even tho it'll most likely be a NO just cause we love to say NO.
You're messing with the wrong group. Good luck. You'll need it.

Slick111 11-26-2014 06:18 AM

Slightly off topic,.....

“This transfer is solely driven by forecasts showing an insufficient number of pilots at Envoy in 2015 to operate our planned schedule,” American SVP-regional carriers Kenji Hashimoto said in a letter to Envoy employees.
*********************************************

This leads me to two thoughts/questions. Is AAG taking this opportunity to:
1) lower their costs by getting rid of their highest-cost regional affiliate and transferring aircraft to other regional affiliates who's cost will (initially) continue to decline, while
2) using a (self-induced) staffing shortage at Envoy as proof that government regulation is causing a shortage of available pilots and that the government must relax the new experience requirements for 121 first officers so that the (voting) public will not be unfairly burdened and inconvenienced by cancelled flights and reductions in service to smaller communities.

Just something to think about. God knows that Parker, Glass, Kirby, et al. are always thinking.

snippercr 11-26-2014 07:01 AM


Originally Posted by Slick111 (Post 1771242)
Slightly off topic,.....

“This transfer is solely driven by forecasts showing an insufficient number of pilots at Envoy in 2015 to operate our planned schedule,” American SVP-regional carriers Kenji Hashimoto said in a letter to Envoy employees.
*********************************************

This leads me to two thoughts/questions. Is AAG taking this opportunity to:
1) lower their costs by getting rid of their highest-cost regional affiliate and transferring aircraft to other regional affiliates who's cost will (initially) continue to decline, while
2) using a (self-induced) staffing shortage at Envoy as proof that government regulation is causing a shortage of available pilots and that the government must relax the new experience requirements for 121 first officers so that the (voting) public will not be unfairly burdened and inconvenienced by cancelled flights and reductions in service to smaller communities.

Just something to think about. God knows that Parker, Glass, Kirby, et al. are always thinking.

As for 1) - I think that is the overall goal. By the time they get us down to 68 airplanes, that's roughly 700 pilots, roughly 350 captains. We have arguably 200-300 "lifers" who will be here forever and cap out at 18 year pay. Why would an airline want to basically run the most expensive pilot group ever? 68 airplanes is just 8 shy of the magic 60 that has been cited to be able to shutter the flight operation. They were able to give out 97 in just 2 months, 60 would be easy.

As for 2), I don't think so. They would have a hard time arguing that because they have successfully placed the aircraft at other locations. If they were unable to do so, and thus had to start cutting service to locations (Great Lakes, ie) then you would see them making a push.

eaglefly 11-26-2014 07:59 AM


Originally Posted by citxls (Post 1771112)
There is always the 10% of losers group out there who is emailing Sam Pool begging him to make a deal. Keep our jobs, **** the pay.

Sad way to live.

No one is going to lose a job. The plan is to consolidate some of the "Eagle's" anyway and it doesn't matter what size Envoy is when that occurs. The in-house Eagle will be an E-175 only operation and ultimately Envoy pilots who stay will fly them at the consolidated carrier.

Alex14 11-26-2014 08:06 AM

Is there any hope for a future at Envoy for a new hire? I have an offer, but wouldn't be able to start until May due to other obligations. This would be my first airline.

use2fly 11-26-2014 08:46 AM


Originally Posted by Alex14 (Post 1771295)
Is there any hope for a future at Envoy for a new hire? I have an offer, but wouldn't be able to start until May due to other obligations. This would be my first airline.

Take the offer and then wait and see. I would think that by May it will be pretty clear if Envoy is hopeless or not.

chignutsak 11-26-2014 09:19 AM


Originally Posted by Alex14 (Post 1771295)
Is there any hope for a future at Envoy for a new hire? I have an offer, but wouldn't be able to start until May due to other obligations. This would be my first airline.

Tough to answer - obviously they are shrinking. How much remains to be seen. Also unknown is how many gummers stay - they could very well be swinging gear for each other.

"Positive rate, gear up. When did you get hired?"

"1997".

"Rookie!"

snippercr 11-26-2014 09:24 AM


Originally Posted by chignutsak (Post 1771323)
Tough to answer - obviously they are shrinking. How much remains to be seen. Also unknown is how many gummers stay - they could very well be swinging gear for each other.

"Positive rate, gear up. When did you get hired?"

"1997".

"Rookie!"

2 gummers flying together - can't wait to see the one in the left seat take it from the one in the right seat after landing the second the nose gear touches down:

"Nice landing, my aircraft (engages tiller), lock em up after landing checklist"... still at 135 knots.

Take the offer, if they will let you select a May class (they might not). You will have plenty of time to go for something else between now and then. IF you get another offer, take it unless some miracle happens at Envoy. But I have started buying lottery tickets again and I have far more confidence in that.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:55 AM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands