Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
CR2/E145 time no longer competitive? >

CR2/E145 time no longer competitive?

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

CR2/E145 time no longer competitive?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-02-2015 | 07:12 AM
  #11  
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 160
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by CarolinaAngler
Is the 900 cockpit really all that different? Maybe a few buttons. Not sure if serious here. Maybe I bit on a troll. Gave me a good laugh though.
While the 900 cockpit may be similar to the CR2, the length of the fuselage and the presence of slats make the plane a whole different animal, similar to an MD-80 series jet. A great trainer for the majors, same way the ERJ-170 series is a great trainer for the 737 and Airbus mainliners.
Old 01-02-2015 | 07:12 AM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 939
Likes: 0
Default

see, it's not just regional pilots that are juvenile. I don't believe OP flies for a regional.
Old 01-02-2015 | 07:18 AM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 362
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Brand X
I'm thinking that CR2 and E145 time might no longer be competitive towards getting on at the majors. The majors should be looking for guys/gals with heavier RJ time than the 50 seaters. I believe this is because the new generation RJs have advanced flight decks that mirror what the majors fly, some with auto throttles and engines underneath the wing that mirror the handling characteristics of mainline jets. Other's fuselages are so long that they require judgmental oversteering to avoid putting wheels in the mud. All things being equal with the candidate, the majors should choose the guy/gal with heavy RJ time vs. one with light RJ time. Kinda like some of the premier foreign carriers that require time in jets with a certain weight range and the current 50 seat RJs do not qualify.
This post gave me cancer....
Old 01-02-2015 | 07:20 AM
  #14  
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 160
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Fr8doggie
Who knows what the actual criteria they will use but I doubt that a embraer 190 will have much clout over a 145. Many of the guys getting hired at majors are pure fighter guys never having flown anything longer than 40ft. I found my flying turboprops out of the ten busiest airports in the country all day long was the best experience to prepare me for Fedex flying. Fortunately according to the hiring department it was enough to help me escape the regionals.
You and I both know that the military pilots, especially fighter pilots, are in a separate category with regards to hiring at the majors. The majors just want to see that they completed military flight training and really don't care what aircraft they flew while on active duty.

Civilian pilots are totally different, with the great disparage in basic flight training from 91vs. 141 vs. local FBO vs. big name aero university. If I were doing the hiring at the majors and I was recruiting regional pilots, like I said earlier, all things being equal, I'd pick the guy/gal with the heavy RJ time vs. one with just TP or 50 seat RJ time, as the heavy RJs most mirror the types of aircraft that the majors fly.
Old 01-02-2015 | 07:24 AM
  #15  
satpak77's Avatar
Working weekends
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,384
Likes: 0
From: Left Seat
Default

OP clearly does not understand the industry. A personal friend of mine just went to a sought-after major, college degree, ATP, ONLY turboprop time, non-glass cockpit. Once on the line, he confided to a Captain regarding his "lack" of glass time/RJ time/etc.

"Son, we hire for talent, and train the skills here"

Happy New Year
Old 01-02-2015 | 07:26 AM
  #16  
BoilerUP's Avatar
Doing One Pilot's Job
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 7,891
Likes: 130
Default

Old 01-02-2015 | 07:29 AM
  #17  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 491
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Brand X
While the 900 cockpit may be similar to the CR2, the length of the fuselage and the presence of slats make the plane a whole different animal, similar to an MD-80 series jet. A great trainer for the majors, same way the ERJ-170 series is a great trainer for the 737 and Airbus mainliners.
Just like the md-80 and 737 have modern avionics and a modern flight deck that are a whole different animal than a CRJ-900 and emb-170/190. If you've never flown a steam gauge in Cessna 172 training and have only flown glass cockpit 172s and RJ glass cockpits, it'll be a rude awakening trying to learn steam gauges for the first time during your md-80/737/757/767/a300 training.
Old 01-02-2015 | 07:42 AM
  #18  
Gets Weekends Off
Liked
25M+ Airline Miles
Line Holder
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 12,836
Likes: 175
From: window seat
Default

Originally Posted by Brand X
The majors should be looking for guys/gals with heavier RJ time than the 50 seaters.
Old 01-02-2015 | 07:47 AM
  #19  
Crazy Canuck's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 1,154
Likes: 0
Default

This thread....

http://youtu.be/oYsXc3hqgEE

****!
Old 01-02-2015 | 08:12 AM
  #20  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 504
Likes: 0
Default

All about them engines being under the wings. I heard the FAA is going to require another specific ATP ride just to fly airplanes with engines under the wings. They are that different.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
KennyG1700
Flight Schools and Training
40
08-01-2019 12:53 AM
lakehouse
Hiring News
32
08-24-2010 10:38 AM
MrBigAir
Aviation Law
21
11-06-2008 08:00 AM
SNIZ
Cargo
67
11-01-2008 11:02 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices