Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

ERJ vs CRJ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-04-2015 | 07:46 AM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 471
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by kfahmi
Dunno why everyone hates the 200. It's a roomier cabin than the 145, and while its ECS system and climb capabilities are pathetic, it handles delightfully when you hand-fly.
The 200 cockpit maybe an inch wider but you feel caved in because of the small windows. The erj has bigger windows and better seats(when new) as well as the cockpit being deeper in length, you can recline near flat. The ERJ has the fadec which the 200 does not, more automated. Also it can climb to its service ceiling fully loaded in one try.
Reply
Old 03-04-2015 | 08:08 AM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 555
Likes: 0
Default

Embraer is growing and Bombardier is struggling. The E170 type might be more advantageous for future opportunities, especially if you're interested in working abroad. Also, the 170/190 type allows you to go to a mainline operator "pre-typed".


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Reply
Old 03-04-2015 | 08:18 AM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
Default

After almost 30yrs of this it's about paycheck and schedule. After a couple months the wow factor turns to boredom.
Reply
Old 03-04-2015 | 08:25 AM
  #14  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 248
Likes: 0
Default

I always thought the erj was more comfortable as a passenger, there is a real chance to get the single seat. I would take the single seat on an erj then any airplane in the sky where I have to sit next to someone.
Reply
Old 03-04-2015 | 08:34 AM
  #15  
IlliniPilot99's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 582
Likes: 0
Default

this is so stupid...especially since for tallflyer he'll switch airlines soon and can tell us which one he likes better...trying to get all those regional types on one cert
Reply
Old 03-04-2015 | 08:50 AM
  #16  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,610
Likes: 15
Default

Originally Posted by IlliniPilot99
this is so stupid...especially since for tallflyer he'll switch airlines soon and can tell us which one he likes better...trying to get all those regional types on one cert
Um, last time I checked we're both on our third regional.

That said, you're on your third airplane, I'm only on my second.

Did I pee in your Cheerios one morning back in our Landcare days or something?
Reply
Old 03-04-2015 | 09:04 AM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 955
Likes: 0
From: CL65
Default

Coke vs. Pepsi

I'll choose whichever one pays me more, allows me to live where I want to, and gives me the best career progression. Other than that, they are the same thing. Small differences that amount to very little.

Anyone that chooses their airline based on CRJ 200 vs. ERJ 140 is foolish. CRJ 200 vs 170/190 or CRJ 900 vs Q400 is a completely different argument...choose the airline that has airplanes that will still be flying in 6 years.
Reply
Old 03-04-2015 | 09:07 AM
  #18  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 828
Likes: 0
Default

Take the one that allows you to live in base or has the easiest commute. Don't chase the plane.
Reply
Old 03-04-2015 | 09:40 AM
  #19  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 1,054
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by comrcap
After almost 30yrs of this it's about paycheck and schedule. After a couple months the wow factor turns to boredom.
This. I know you won't believe it, but shiny jet syndrome is going to wear off fast. After a year tops, it is just a job. Never let the type of plane you are going to fly at a regional play into the decision process.
In the end, whether it is a beat up old dash 8, or a shiny new mini 737, they are all just airplanes and the autopilot does most of the dancing whilst you pass the hours in the cockpit with boredom.

Personally, my favorite flying was on a turboprop: more challenging, less automation, less long legs....etc...

Go after the important stuff: living in base, best contract, best future, fast upgrade.
Reply
Old 03-04-2015 | 09:46 AM
  #20  
Fegelein's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 369
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by TallFlyer
Ok, I'll bite.

Between the 145 and the CRJ I'd choose the CRJ, in particular the 700/900. Wider cockpit, synoptic pages.

Between the CRJ and the 170/175 I'd take the 170/175. Because autothrottle a and engines under the wings.
Definitely! It's more like a mainliner than an RJ.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
turk
Flight Schools and Training
29
01-13-2012 05:58 AM
Mason32
Regional
277
07-27-2010 06:01 PM
saab2000
Regional
46
11-27-2007 02:35 PM
supercell86
Regional
46
04-22-2006 08:41 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices