Go Back   Airline Pilot Central Forums - Find your next job as a Pilot > >
Regional Regional airlines
 

Welcome to Airline Pilot Forums - Connect and get the inside scoop on Airline Companies

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ. Join our community today and start interacting with existing members. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free.


User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 01-18-2007, 01:20 PM   #21  
Gets Weekends Off
 
dingo222's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Posts: 512
Default

it could be real good for colgan in the short term. Colgan needs more planes to take the new flying being thrown at them everyday. PCL has saabs that colgan can use NOW. Thats 10 more saabs that colgan can put to use quick. The thing that was holding colgan back was the cash. Now they have it. I agree with airsupport, I'd expect to see some bigger t-props in the future.

THere is 2 reasons why i see pcl did this. the first would be the more honest reason. Colgan is making money, and the have the niche t-prop cornered right now. Pcl holdings can make colgan more effecient and help them grow, which colgan couldnt do on it's own. They take the money that colgan is earning and spread it between the 2 companies to help both grow.

That would be the honest thing to do.

The second reason would be to whipsaw the pcl pilots at contract time. Both may happen. Neither may happen. Who knows! I never thought this would happen in the first place. I'd bet that colgan will be adding 5-10 planes or even more in the next 6 months. thats my 2 cents, but i'm already down a case of beer!
dingo222 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2007, 02:07 PM   #22  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Position: SAABster
Posts: 639
Default

Smells like MESABA and Big Sky.
XJPILOT1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2007, 05:10 PM   #23  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Position: CRJ
Posts: 2,351
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by XJPILOT1 View Post
Smells like MESABA and Big Sky.
not really. the key here is that colgan has no jets,, so for them to get jets on the certificate would be a big deal. not saying it wont happen but i think colgan will get more props, and bigger props, and pncl will just get more jets. the difference is we have scope already saying any new flying must be done by pinnacle airlines pilots. we were smart enough to put in the last conctract that Pinnacle airlines pilots will do all present and future flying for Pinnacle INC. thats some pretty solid scope protection,,, now are they going to try and find a way around it... YOU BETCHA!!
Airsupport is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2007, 05:41 PM   #24  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Short Bus Drive's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: 756- Right
Posts: 1,853
Default

If it's Inc., you might be screwed. "INC." is the Airline.
"Corp" is the, well, corporation.
Also, they are keeping them separate (for now), so they can do any flying they can get there hands on.
Short Bus Drive is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2007, 07:32 PM   #25  
Gets Weekends Off
 
STR8NLVL's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Position: 767 CA
Posts: 411
Default

That's why we need a combined union. To keep them from whipsawing the PCL contract by threatening to bid all new contracts through Colgan b/c our rules are worse and pay scales cheaper.

One company, one union.
STR8NLVL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2007, 07:33 PM   #26  
Gets Weekends Off
 
reelbigchair's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: CRJ Capt.
Posts: 407
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Airsupport View Post
not really. the key here is that colgan has no jets,, so for them to get jets on the certificate would be a big deal. not saying it wont happen but i think colgan will get more props, and bigger props, and pncl will just get more jets. the difference is we have scope already saying any new flying must be done by pinnacle airlines pilots. we were smart enough to put in the last conctract that Pinnacle airlines pilots will do all present and future flying for Pinnacle INC. thats some pretty solid scope protection,,, now are they going to try and find a way around it... YOU BETCHA!!
The TSA pilots built that exact phrase into their contract, and that didn't slow down management from creating GoJets. That little bit of scope cannot protect you.
reelbigchair is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2007, 07:42 PM   #27  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Position: CRJ
Posts: 2,351
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by reelbigchair View Post
The TSA pilots built that exact phrase into their contract, and that didn't slow down management from creating GoJets. That little bit of scope cannot protect you.
theirs was actually a little different. but the same still applies, i have even heard already that grievences are already in the works. our scope says it in as plain english as it gets. any flying done for pinnacle holdings will be done by pinnacle airlines pilots.
Airsupport is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2007, 08:10 PM   #28  
On Reserve
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Position: RJ FO
Posts: 10
Default

as far as the grievance thing goes, I filed 4 in the past 2 years on black and white contract issues that I should have clearly won. Guess what, I have not heard a g dam thing. These pigs will do whatever the hell they want and you know it.
Brizzybrad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2007, 08:40 PM   #29  
Gets Weekends Off
 
BCDurbin's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2005
Position: 717 FO >>>> 737 FO
Posts: 295
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by STR8NLVL View Post
$20M for 39 planes that sell for over a million each seems kind of lean to me. They must have some MASSIVE debt to be assumed, too.

Well, who's for signing a union card and getting the pilot groups together?!
We lease several of our aircraft. I've never seen any dollar amount for Colgan's assets. But I did hear it's just a controlling percentage - not the whole thing.

I'll be waiting for that union card in the mail!!
BCDurbin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2007, 04:50 AM   #30  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Position: CRJ
Posts: 2,351
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brizzybrad View Post
as far as the grievance thing goes, I filed 4 in the past 2 years on black and white contract issues that I should have clearly won. Guess what, I have not heard a g dam thing. These pigs will do whatever the hell they want and you know it.
remember that when it comes to grievences, sections 1 and 2 get immediate action by alpa lawyers.
Airsupport is offline   Reply With Quote
 
 
 

 
Reply
 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Related Topics
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Reserve at Colgan JoeyMeatballs Regional 19 01-07-2008 06:12 AM
AWAC or Colgan 46Pilot Regional 28 05-31-2006 07:40 PM
Colgan Air Pilot Hiring - Open House WEACLRS Hiring News 0 05-12-2006 06:16 AM
Colgan, stay or go cloudkicker1981 Regional 21 04-11-2006 05:04 AM
To Pinnacle or Not to Pinnacle? That is the question love2fly Regional 19 12-10-2005 07:16 PM


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:41 PM.


vBulletin® v3.9.3.5, Copyright ©2000-2019, MH Sub I, LLC dba vBulletin
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2019 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Website Copyright 2000 - 2017 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands

Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.1