Insight at RAH/S5
05-08-2015 | 07:51 PM
#81
Banned
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 571
Likes: 0
Are you referring to that silly little scope clause that the IBT lap dogs said doesn't matter? If BB wants to lease out the planes he can't staff, he's gonna do it. The whiny little trucker *****es are impotent to do anything about it.
05-08-2015 | 08:20 PM
#82
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 183
Likes: 0
NC update says "This week your Negotiating Committee (NC) discussed, with the Company, Article 1 (Scope), Article 6 (Scheduling), Article 7 (Reserve Duty), Article 8 (Paid Days Off), Article 25 (Duration), and Article 31 (Flying the Line). No Articles have been TA’d since April 23rd".
This is as expected from RAH. Sounds like the company is shifting to plan B, so don't come here.
This is as expected from RAH. Sounds like the company is shifting to plan B, so don't come here.
05-08-2015 | 08:38 PM
#83
Line Holder
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 521
Likes: 1
NC update says "This week your Negotiating Committee (NC) discussed, with the Company, Article 1 (Scope), Article 6 (Scheduling), Article 7 (Reserve Duty), Article 8 (Paid Days Off), Article 25 (Duration), and Article 31 (Flying the Line). No Articles have been TA’d since April 23rd".
This is as expected from RAH. Sounds like the company is shifting to plan B, so don't come here.
This is as expected from RAH. Sounds like the company is shifting to plan B, so don't come here.
05-08-2015 | 09:40 PM
#85
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 3,152
Likes: 15
05-08-2015 | 11:18 PM
#86
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 183
Likes: 0
Simple he leases the planes to another company and they staff them. Good news for another company, but not for anyone hired after 2008 at RAH. Yea I Scope Scope Scope!!! BB is not concerned about violating our current CBA. He has to fly the airplanes, they don't make money parked on the ramp.
05-09-2015 | 05:15 PM
#87
Banned
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 2,001
Likes: 0
From: 6 Train - Panhandler
At least RAH made money. Always on the bright side.
Republic Airways Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ/NM: RJET) reported financial results for the first quarter of 2015.
Republic’s pre-tax income for the first quarter of 2015 was $11.2 million, compared to $22.8 million for the prior year’s first quarter. Republic’s net income for the first quarter of 2015 was $6.4 million, or $0.13 per diluted share. The Company incurred approximately $8.0 million, or $0.09 per diluted share, for charges related to fleet transition expenses and employee severance costs, which are included in other operating expense.
The first quarter of 2015 results also were negatively affected by a reduction in operational reliability. Republic’s operating performance, as measured in block hours, departures and available seat miles was approximately 4 percent lower than planned.
Republic Airways Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ/NM: RJET) reported financial results for the first quarter of 2015.
Republic’s pre-tax income for the first quarter of 2015 was $11.2 million, compared to $22.8 million for the prior year’s first quarter. Republic’s net income for the first quarter of 2015 was $6.4 million, or $0.13 per diluted share. The Company incurred approximately $8.0 million, or $0.09 per diluted share, for charges related to fleet transition expenses and employee severance costs, which are included in other operating expense.
The first quarter of 2015 results also were negatively affected by a reduction in operational reliability. Republic’s operating performance, as measured in block hours, departures and available seat miles was approximately 4 percent lower than planned.
05-09-2015 | 05:51 PM
#88
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 610
Likes: 0
It's like the majors are throwing airplanes at the crappy regionals, whether they can staff them or not, to kill off the respected/decent paying regionals with the knowledge the pilots at said regionals will need to make a backwards move to to crappy regional as they all eventually die.
05-09-2015 | 06:29 PM
#89
Line Holder
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 521
Likes: 1
That is also in there but wouldn't be applicable under that situation. I think it is worded that any leases must not cause a furlough. But that is meant to protect against leasing to foreign carriers (which we have/are doing. I believe they could get away with leasing the aircraft to foreign carriers under this clause. However, for the domestic market (the situations discussed earlier in the thread) it would not be possible under the current contract.
It's prob because Compass raked AA over the coals. Right is not an ideal time to put a bid out for rj flying. It must be way cheaper to extend at a previously agreed contract with pricing. Also I am sure its a super cheap deal for Delta to turn up the pressure on a contractor that runs feed for its two largest competitors in there brand new flagship rjs.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
