Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
First Regional to sponsor work visas? >

First Regional to sponsor work visas?


Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

First Regional to sponsor work visas?

Old 05-28-2015 | 04:31 AM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 252
Likes: 0
From: Bizjet Captain
Default First Regional to sponsor work visas?

So, what do you think: Is it just a question of "when" not "if"?

I don't see any of the majors sponsoring work visas anytime soon but it seems to me that the regionals might be close. Wishful thinking on my part?

I hold both an EASA (EU) ATPL and an FAA ATP and have plenty of 135 and 121 (equivalent) time including Jet PIC.

I may be tempted to move to he US for a few years just for the experience. I think it would be great for the wife and young kids.

Why wouldn't regionals try to take advantage of experienced foreign pilots who may wish to live in the States for some time?

It's not like I would be taking a job away from a qualified and experienced US citizen.
Reply
Old 05-28-2015 | 04:35 AM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,049
Likes: 0
From: I pilot
Default

The US govt would have to change work visa category rules or else create a new visa category.

My airline has full new hire classes currently, so they wouldn't be looking to go down this route.
Reply
Old 05-28-2015 | 04:35 AM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 1,244
Likes: 0
Default

I could of sworn some company wanted Australians to come work at their regional... or something like that
Reply
Old 05-28-2015 | 04:38 AM
  #4  
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 2,137
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by germanaviator
So, what do you think: Is it just a question of "when" not "if"?

I don't see any of the majors sponsoring work visas anytime soon but it seems to me that the regionals might be close. Wishful thinking on my part?

I hold both an EASA (EU) ATPL and an FAA ATP and have plenty of 135 and 121 (equivalent) time including Jet PIC.

I may be tempted to move to he US for a few years just for the experience. I think it would be great for the wife and young kids.

Why wouldn't regionals try to take advantage of experienced foreign pilots who may wish to live in the States for some time?

It's not like I would be taking a job away from a qualified and experienced US citizen.
I know of nobody doing it or plans to do it but it seems like a future logical step. Most US pilots would rather the entire regional airline system just collapse and go away though.
Reply
Old 05-28-2015 | 04:53 AM
  #5  
saab2000's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,755
Likes: 6
Default

Originally Posted by germanaviator
So, what do you think: Is it just a question of "when" not "if"?

I don't see any of the majors sponsoring work visas anytime soon but it seems to me that the regionals might be close. Wishful thinking on my part?

I hold both an EASA (EU) ATPL and an FAA ATP and have plenty of 135 and 121 (equivalent) time including Jet PIC.

I may be tempted to move to he US for a few years just for the experience. I think it would be great for the wife and young kids.

Why wouldn't regionals try to take advantage of experienced foreign pilots who may wish to live in the States for some time?

It's not like I would be taking a job away from a qualified and experienced US citizen.
I worked in Europe and learned how to fly under JAA (now EASA) rules. It's night and day different. Some things are better in the US and some things are better in Europe.

The door seems to have closed on me returning to Europe to work. I asked a buddy at LX and in spite of the shortage there it seems impossible for me to go back. They won't sponsor work visas there anymore. I was married then so it was different back in the 1990s and early 2000s.

I don't know how it would be with getting a work visa in the US but you really don't want to start at the bottom of a seniority list at a US regional carrier. Working in Europe was, for the most part, a vastly superior experience overall.

Believe it or not, the only things that are better here in the US are pay and training. The pay truly is better, at least at my company and with my seniority, over what I made in Europe. The other thing is training. The training and standards here, again speaking only of my current employer, are notably higher than they were when I worked in Europe. We had a bad safety and accountability culture at my carrier there (IMHO) but here (at my current airline) things are far better in terms of CRM and accountability.

Anyway that's a bit of a tangent. I think you'd be better off pursuing a work visa with a respected corporate operator (fractional) or a major airline. Regional airlines are, for the most part, dead end jobs and your family life will suffer. Many people in the US (myself included) hope the regional model is vastly reduced as it's nothing more than a B-scale in terms of pay and working rules but you fly jet equipment in the exact same markets as larger, major airlines. Working at a regional airline should never be considered a destination.
Reply
Old 05-28-2015 | 05:04 AM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 384
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by JohnnyDingus
I could of sworn some company wanted Australians to come work at their regional... or something like that
I think that was just an instance of dipping toes into the water ... the US has a special visa for Australians that lets them come to work here with fewer restrictions than most visas.
Reply
Old 05-28-2015 | 05:10 AM
  #7  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 4,153
Likes: 341
Default

Cape Air is already doing it.
Reply
Old 05-28-2015 | 05:16 AM
  #8  
Grumpyaviator's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 2,030
Likes: 1
Default

It's being considered privately by most large regionals.
Reply
Old 05-28-2015 | 06:43 AM
  #9  
On Reserve
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Grumpyaviator
It's being considered privately by most large regionals.
So the question begs to be answered.
Would you guys/gals prefer foreigners coming over to take regional jobs or would you prefer the ATP rule to be relaxed so that regionals could hire Americans?
Not trolling, just really curious.
Reply
Old 05-28-2015 | 06:48 AM
  #10  
Grumpyaviator's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 2,030
Likes: 1
Default

I don't like the idea of others taking our jobs. But if there aren't enough of us here then I guess it will happen just like it has happened in other countries. However, they shouldhave FAA certificates and meet 121 requirements. But I don't support a relaxation of the 1500 hour rule. Even though it hasn't created better pilots, I feel the experience pilots gain before going to the airlines is important.


The fact is though, the demand is global, and additional pilots from sponsoring VISAs probably wouldn't make that much difference.

Why would a qualified pilot willing to relocate come to the U.S. And work for the equivalent of minimum wage when they can go to the ME or Asia and make a lot more money? If it were to happen I would like to see a reciprocation so we could go work in Europe or other desirable places (not Asia or the ME) with less red tape.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
OutsourceNoMo
American
52
09-24-2023 10:35 AM
dvhighdrive88
United
74
06-03-2013 07:34 AM
groovinaviator
Regional
24
02-11-2008 03:34 PM
papacharlie
Regional
39
01-27-2008 05:01 PM
ryane946
Major
12
10-09-2006 05:52 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices