Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
SKYW Pilots planning walkout? >

SKYW Pilots planning walkout?

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

SKYW Pilots planning walkout?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-25-2007 | 03:35 PM
  #71  
Gets Weekends Off
20 Years
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,047
Likes: 20
From: 7ER B...whatever that means.
Default

Originally Posted by LAfrequentflyer
As a regional pilot do you, R777, feel putting the 2% into your 401K or even a lifestrategy fund thru Vanguard / T.Rowe Price/ Janus is better than giving it to ALPA in membership dues?

V/r,
LAFF
I think anyone in their right mind would rather keep that 2% and put in their 401k or pay their mortgage or start a business or buy a boat. But where do you think the wages and benefits came from to allow you to do those things? Out of the kindness of management's heart? Ask a SkyWest newhire FO how much fun living in California or Chicago is on $19/hr.
Reply
Old 01-25-2007 | 03:43 PM
  #72  
LAfrequentflyer's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,242
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by freezingflyboy
I think anyone in their right mind would rather keep that 2% and put in their 401k or pay their mortgage or start a business or buy a boat. But where do you think the wages and benefits came from to allow you to do those things? Out of the kindness of management's heart? Ask a SkyWest newhire FO how much fun living in California or Chicago is on $19/hr.
Unions.

No.

Thanks for getting my point...

-LAFF
Reply
Old 01-25-2007 | 03:50 PM
  #73  
Koolaidman's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 467
Likes: 0
From: SKYW CRJ FO
Default

I'm with Rick7777, fix Mesa, Trans States, and if ALPA can find the time to get the GoJet flying back to Trans States, then I'll vote for it as well.

Isn't ALPA in a conflict of interest by promoting/allowing/not doing anything to prevent Mesa, SKYW, etc., from flying 900s for what they get paid? Also, I thought everyone on here thought that the 900 is for mainline, so why is ALPA not standing up for the majors and fixing scope language in the major airlines' contracts that they represent? Why is ALPA national not telling the Mesa and whoever else is ALPA that flies 900s not to do it because it hurts us all in the long run? Why is that?

Rick7777 hits it dead on, fix the carriers that have less than we do at SkyWest before telling us how we need ALPA.

I also checked our policy manual today. It specifically states that it is an "agreement" between SkyWest, Inc. and the pilots. I look forward to losing my job when they change something in there without the approval of all parties, which is also written in there, and I file a lawsuit against them! (Wishful thinking, I know!) But truly, our Policy Manual is written like a contract and specifically states all parties must agree and that the Policy Manual is an Agreement!

However, apparently the F/A's went to court, filed a class action suit and lost. I believe it was regarding pay. I would personally like the opportunity to hear the reasoning the judge gave for not finding that this "agreement" between SkyWest and its F/A's exists and ruling in favor of SkyWest.

And before all of the pro-ALPA nuts go off, Trans States' contract was also broken by Uncle Hoolas by creating GoJet. ALPA went to court to prove that GoJet was an Alter-Ego airline, which clearly was in violation against page one of TSA's contract regarding Alter-Ego airlines, and take a wild guess who came out of the court room smiling?

Now everyone go off on me and tell me I am ruining the industry instead of answering my questions!
Reply
Old 01-25-2007 | 03:56 PM
  #74  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,127
Likes: 796
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by LAfrequentflyer
As a regional pilot do you, R777, feel putting the 2% into your 401K or even a lifestrategy fund thru Vanguard / T.Rowe Price/ Janus is better than giving it to ALPA in membership dues?

V/r,
LAFF
Of course I'd rather put it into a 401k, but as I have said before unions are necessary in this industry. Of course I recognize that SKW's policies are based on union negotiated contracts. Every industry has room for one or two companies that voluntarily meet the standard without a union. I have paid union dues in the past and will likely do so again. My current problem with alpa is not the 2%, it is:

1) The damage they would likely do to SKW. I have seen alpa at work at my previous airline and don't want that in my life now. If SKW descends to the level of other regionals (no it's not there yet) then maybe a union would be necessary (hopefully in-house)

2) The fact that the alpa implementation at the regional level is an abject failure (and a lot of major guys aren't much happier). They appear to have disregarded the regionals and left them to flounder, or possibly even sabotaged them to the benefit of the majors.


On the positive side, the new guy Prater has made all the right noises and appears to recognize the problems on the regional side. Maybe he will make some headway, but we'll have to wait and see.

I would be interested in alpa if they able were to:

1) Fix mesa, and the other jacked-up alpa regionals.
2) Establish a NATIONAL plan and standards as to where this profession is headed, and then enforce it.

v/r,
R
Reply
Old 01-25-2007 | 05:58 PM
  #75  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,356
Likes: 0
From: CRJ
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
It's 8. Again, you are a lying sack. I suggest you take your attitude and BS over to flightinfo where you will be appreciated. I can usually participate in civil conversations and learn some things here, but since you don't want to play nice I'm not going to respond to you any more (well maybe on FI). Have a good day.
really civilized. i don't bother jumpin around on message boards. i just stick to one, sorry it happens to be the one where you try and play nice. any who, like i said, they implemented it without asking, most people threw a fit, and then they eventually chaged it back. so relax man,, you are wound up way to tight!
Reply
Old 02-06-2007 | 12:47 PM
  #76  
Ellen's Avatar
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 657
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by freezingflyboy
I think anyone in their right mind would rather keep that 2% and put in their 401k or pay their mortgage or start a business or buy a boat. But where do you think the wages and benefits came from to allow you to do those things? Out of the kindness of management's heart? Ask a SkyWest newhire FO how much fun living in California or Chicago is on $19/hr.

That starting wage is pretty pathetic. If you figure in duty time the starting wage is probably closer to $13.50/hr. TO FLY A JET! What a bargain for them. If only the flying public knew. I can see it now in USA Today!

"At 39,000 feet, Your Lives Are In The Hands of A $13.50/hr Employee"
U.S. Regional Airlines-Your Safety is a Hoax

If the public knew this, they probably wouldn't get on a plane. Maybe the US Govt. needs to mandate a Minimum Starting Wage for an Airline Pilot since it involves the Safety of Millions of Americans. Maybe that should go into the Patriot Act.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
nw320driver
Foreign
35
10-15-2010 07:41 PM
fireman0174
Major
46
11-19-2006 05:49 AM
nw320driver
Major
15
11-17-2006 07:45 AM
HSLD
Flight Schools and Training
2
05-14-2006 09:07 AM
RockBottom
Major
0
04-29-2005 07:26 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices