So once again, you fail to back up anything you say. All you can do at this point is deflect questions that you know you dont have the answers to. Just another sad pilot who keeps repeating what he wants to happen, hoping that if he says it enough times it will come true. Nothing you have said is becoming apparent to anyone but you, you're a fraud, a liar, and a grandstander. Keep throwing insults to deflect those questions you can't answer, it only makes you look worse.

We need a "wheels falling off the wheels falling off rah" thread

We're not talking about the birds in the N200NN - N211NN tail number range here, are we? Are those the Envoy large Embraers, or are they the ones flown by YX?

Those are compass


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

The rumor is hoffa is to overturn jcii et al (i.e.357)

Haven't heard that rumor at all.

You're just making stuff up.

This rumor was actually just confirmed by one of my flight attendants hairdresser.

The Major 3 can choose not to accept the higher paying CPA. Both Delta and United have already begun instituting plans to deal with diminishing regional feeds. For example: United has made plans for additional 777s, 737s and 320s to take over the regional routes (of course at a reduced frequency) I believe UA announced that they will have an additional 105 daily departures by next year to cover a reduction of 580 daily regional departures. AA is the only one that I have not seen to be preparing for this eventuality. In true AAG fashion, they will follow the market leaders and institute similar strategies in the near future. With the preexisting E190s fleet at LUS/AA, they will likely be able to transition future or existing E175 aircraft or orders over to the mainline operation quickly should they need to.

In any case, IMO, I do not see the Big 3 agreeing to significant increases in their CPAs. While not wishing misfortune on the RAH pilots, I think ALL regional pilots can agree that it is in our collective best interests to see the major airlines choose to add more mainline airframes to their fleets over paying higher prices for "regional" lift.

Why would Hoffa do that? Maybe he wants to get decertified?

Oh gawd! It's true then!

He's correct. BNDES wasn't going to loan RJet the funds without a guarantee. The flying that AMR gave to RJET was part of the guarantee along with (my understanding) a promise to pay if RJET defaulted. In the document it was also disclosed that AMR could take those aircraft and redeploy them elsewhere if RJET didn't meet certain performance criteria.

This was documented in the bankruptcy by APA, I forget exactly why. I believe it's in this document from the SEC, but I'm unable to download it on my iPad.

fundingagreementredacted

My personal opinion is that as long as RJET continues to operate (and I personally hope and believe you will), they will continue to fly the 175 for AAG. The rumor at Envoy is that AAG might redeploy 3-5 175s next summer while until RJET is able to operate its full schedule again.

Extending from that is the 175 options for RJET where not executed, but those delivery slots will be converted to Envoys to accelerate there fleet reorganization plan.

Mine, and I think the majority of the pilot group at ENY that were here when it happened, is that it sucked to lose flying to you. However it was a management decision and not the result of pilot shenanigans.

The only part that really stung was seeing our name on the side of your airplane.

BTW you have towed the line better than most of the regionals out there. My hat and respect is off to you all.

I totally get that. And I'm glad to see that you understand that its certainly not a pilot decision. We don't vote on it or control it, so why stress over it. With the way these airlines operate you'll probably get it and lose it 5 times in the next 10 years, and so will RAH.

Personally I hope we lose it all for good to the majors...