CS100 probably
|
Originally Posted by Xdashdriver
(Post 1990319)
Buying the 100 seaters to fly at mainline, allows them to increase the number of 76 seaters flown by the regionals, that's how it applies to regional pilots.
|
Originally Posted by AZ wildcat
(Post 1990335)
If that's a fact, then the vote better be no. Unless it's a 20 to one ratio or better. That's their "in" otherwise.
|
Originally Posted by Waitingformins
(Post 1990336)
Guessing 3-2
|
Does Boeing or Airbus even have a 100 seat airframe? The EMB 190 and CRJ 1000 are both uneconomical hunks of crap.
|
Originally Posted by Rahlifer
(Post 1990341)
Does Boeing or Airbus even have a 100 seat airframe? The EMB 190 and CRJ 1000 are both uneconomical hunks of crap.
|
Originally Posted by Rahlifer
(Post 1990341)
Does Boeing or Airbus even have a 100 seat airframe? The EMB 190 and CRJ 1000 are both uneconomical hunks of crap.
BTW the CRJ-1000 is actually a separate type rating from the other CRJs (100 through 900) |
Originally Posted by Avroman
(Post 1990345)
The closest thing would be either the A-318 (if it's even still in production) or the 737-500 (again, if it's even still in production) the B-717 at Delta is configured to 110 seats. I don't think any us airline still flies the 318 or 735. Not sure what the Emb-190 seats, but it's probably in that 100-110 seat range.
BTW the CRJ-1000 is actually a separate type rating from the other CRJs (100 through 900) I thought united flew the A318? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by AZ wildcat
(Post 1990340)
Everyone in this section of the forum better hope the heck not if so.
|
Originally Posted by Avroman
(Post 1990345)
Not sure what the Emb-190 seats, but it's probably in that 100-110 seat range.
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:41 AM. |
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Website Copyright ©2000 - 2017 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands