Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
Part135 upgrade or Part 121 >

Part135 upgrade or Part 121

Search
Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Part135 upgrade or Part 121

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-04-2016, 04:50 AM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Luv2Rotate's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,498
Default

Originally Posted by Otterbox View Post
What stigma are you talking about? The point I was trying to make is there isn't one for 135 PIC time.

I think passing up on an upgrade to a PIC position when your resume lacks PIC experience it isn't the best idea.
The whole "recruiter's view of 135 PIC time equal to 121 FO time". Come on man.
There's all kinds of 135 operators. Now, if you're flying 135 in a caravan or a twin piston then yes, I can see that time being viewed as 121 FO time but... 121 FO's are being hired with the majors and many have 0 PIC.
Luv2Rotate is offline  
Old 02-04-2016, 08:47 AM
  #22  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Aug 2015
Position: BE20 Captain
Posts: 29
Default

FWIW,

I've got 5500tt, 2500 TPIC, all in a King Air 200, all part 135, and the majors are not calling me.
EMScapt is offline  
Old 02-04-2016, 08:49 AM
  #23  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Luv2Rotate's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,498
Default

Originally Posted by EMScapt View Post
FWIW,

I've got 5500tt, 2500 TPIC, all in a King Air 200, all part 135, and the majors are not calling me.
Maybe it's lack of jet time? Or maybe it's because I have about 6yrs 121 experience before leaving for 135?
Luv2Rotate is offline  
Old 02-04-2016, 09:25 AM
  #24  
Gets Weekends Off
 
BeechedJet's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2013
Position: to-go plate at hotel buffet
Posts: 802
Default

A friend of mine flew 1900s at Gulfstream for a couple of years, he left to fly bizjets for a bunch more years, all short or medium range. Tons of PIC time he got. He got on with United last year. Moral of the story is I don't know what this proves other than he did it with some 121 PIC time on his resume.
BeechedJet is online now  
Old 02-04-2016, 09:31 AM
  #25  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2015
Position: Gear slinger
Posts: 2,899
Default

Originally Posted by Luv2Rotate View Post
The whole "recruiter's view of 135 PIC time equal to 121 FO time". Come on man.
There's all kinds of 135 operators. Now, if you're flying 135 in a caravan or a twin piston then yes, I can see that time being viewed as 121 FO time but... 121 FO's are being hired with the majors and many have 0 PIC.
I think we're both making the same argument. The recruiter didn't care (and came from a part 135 background themselves) about part 135 vs part 121. I specifically asked that because I have the opportunity to go part 135 or to a regional, and I wanted to make sure I wasn't going to shoot myself in the foot if I took the Job that would give me a better quality of life.

The point I made was both are viable paths to the Majors to counter the argument being made that the 135 PIC time would be worthless and the guy would be better off skipping upgrade to be a FO at a 121 regional and never having any PIC time.
Otterbox is offline  
Old 02-04-2016, 10:00 AM
  #26  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Mar 2015
Position: CA
Posts: 26
Default

Originally Posted by Robpilot View Post
I'm currently flying right seat in a beech 1900 in Alaska. I have 1400tt and the chief just offered to upgrade me in the spring. Should I stay and upgrade or go to the regionals? Is Beech 1900 PIC time respected by the majors?
Take the upgrade. Can't beat having experience as a captain on your resume. Get some PIC time then go apply at a LCC, then check the 121 box.
flyinggolfer is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
LibertyPilot
Major
15
12-05-2012 12:14 PM
RonWeasley
Hiring News
1
02-04-2012 04:13 PM
redbaron
Career Questions
2
03-08-2008 10:56 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices