![]() |
Originally Posted by Eaglepilot84
(Post 2070575)
This, along with "Living the dream!", is way too overused. Stop.
|
Originally Posted by FirstClass
(Post 2070561)
These graphs don't tell the whole story. I'm all for all that extra money, but if it means you have to be at a contract airline 5 years longer because it takes longer to upgrade or some other circumstance, then your total compensation in pay and benefits will not be high as someone who went to the major leagues 5 years before you. At age 65, those extra 5 years in the big leagues probably means a million dollars extra.
|
Quickest flow to American?
Originally Posted by FirstClass
(Post 2070561)
These graphs don't tell the whole story. I'm all for all that extra money, but if it means you have to be at a contract airline 5 years longer because it takes longer to upgrade or some other circumstance, then your total compensation in pay and benefits will not be high as someone who went to the major leagues 5 years before you. At age 65, those extra 5 years in the big leagues probably means a million dollars extra.
Upgrade times are going to be fast everywhere with the amount of people moving to the majors, and faster for those companies that can fill vacancies and stay adequately staffed. As endeavor has shown, the best way to do that right now is NOT with flow agreements, but with better pay. I don't see how that's not the whole story or how you could possibly end up staying 5 years longer at endeavor over a contact carrier Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by Nantonaku
(Post 2070601)
Where is your graph/data on the "whole story"? Which regional is going to put someone at a major 5 years quicker than another regional?
And I tend to strongly agree with this:
Originally Posted by nh2ri15
(Post 2070622)
Upgrade times are going to be fast everywhere with the amount of people moving to the majors, and faster for those companies that can fill vacancies and stay adequately staffed. As endeavor has shown, the best way to do that right now is NOT with flow agreements, but with better pay. I don't see how that's not the whole story or how you could possibly end up staying 5 years longer at endeavor over a contact carrier
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk It's already old data, though. I just read that ExpressJet also raised first year pay to $40/hr. Maybe we will try to keep it updated and repost as the landscape changes. It would be great to see all the options get to at least industry standard soon. |
Originally Posted by Nantonaku
(Post 2070601)
Where is your graph/data on the "whole story"? Which regional is going to put someone at a major 5 years quicker than another regional?
|
Originally Posted by FirstClass
(Post 2070769)
There is a 16 year flow at Envoy right now. There are 7 year FO's on Reserve at Envoy right now. How's that?
|
Originally Posted by cr700
(Post 2070771)
There is not a 16 year flow at Envoy right now. The projections and math have a new hire today upgrading in 2.5 years and flowing to AA in under 6. Remember, we are talking about today, not 16 years ago.
|
Originally Posted by cr700
(Post 2070771)
There is not a 16 year flow at Envoy right now. The projections and math have a new hire today upgrading in 2.5 years and flowing to AA in under 6. Remember, we are talking about today, not 16 years ago.
Your projections have already been debunked... By your own pilots. In your own thread. |
Originally Posted by Skyler02
(Post 2070492)
The sign on bonus that graph shows for Skywest is only for pilots with a type rating. Xjt has the same deal. And as of yesterday, the xjt rates are now 37, 38, and 38. |
Originally Posted by Nevets
(Post 2070784)
The sign on bonus that graph shows for Skywest is only for pilots with a type rating. Xjt has the same deal. And as of yesterday, the xjt rates are now 37, 38, and 38.
Thanks Nevets. I'll update the graph. Not sure if I should include or not include the Skywest and Express Jet bonus then. I also heard GoJet pay increases are on the table? I don't know. I'll just make updates as I learn of them and maybe I'll post it again with changes periodically. |
Pretty much all the 16 year folks at all three WO's are gone. Now if they're any showing up in the future classes it might because they have bypassed it more then a few times.
Look for the flow times to really start coming down by the end of this summer. Piedmont should be flowing pilots well into those with 10 years or less by end of this year. |
Originally Posted by nh2ri15
(Post 2070252)
Air National Guard is part time.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Probably a decent strategy but I will say I know a couple guard types that are now sim instructors at AA. Can't get an interview yet.. They refuse to go regional and need hours. So you're going to have to do some sort of flying somewhere. If you can work that angle of getting some military on your resume and not have the long full time commitment then I could see that helping. |
PSA's flow for April will have 2004 hires flowing. By August, it should be up to 2006 hires flowing and 2008 hires by this time next year. These estimates are based on current rates of flow, and not with the increased flow as the total number of captains on property increases.
So, right now, we are at 11 years on property to a flow at PSA. |
Close.
2005 hires in the March Class. And 2005 hires for April. |
I also just looked at my pay since I started flying the line at PSA. I divided the total credit hours by the total block hours. The equation totaled 1.61.
That means for every hour that I flew, they paid me 1.61 times my normal hourly rate. This includes extra money that I made flying SDO, junior man pay, training pay, cancellation pay, or Deadhead pay. So, lets say that my company pays $5 less per hour than another company, but that other company does not pay cancellation pay or a pilot at the other company spends a year on reserve (so they can not collect extra trip rigs), then I will still make significantly more than a pilot at the other airline. Simple hourly pay rates do not matter. At all. You can not compare companies based on hourly pay rates. Graphs like the one you posted are misleading and are useless. |
Originally Posted by CLT Guy
(Post 2070890)
PSA's flow for April will have 2004 hires flowing. By August, it should be up to 2006 hires flowing and 2008 hires by this time next year. These estimates are based on current rates of flow, and not with the increased flow as the total number of captains on property increases.
So, right now, we are at 11 years on property to a flow at PSA. |
You all keep comparing the longevity of the current flow throughs.
I'm not sure if you're doing it on purpose, but using that perspective gives an inaccurate assessment for how long it will be for a new hire to flow through. After all...new hires only care about how quickly gramps gets out of their way. |
Originally Posted by boiler07
(Post 2070978)
You all keep comparing the longevity of the current flow throughs.
I'm not sure if you're doing it on purpose, but using that perspective gives an inaccurate assessment for how long it will be for a new hire to flow through. After all...new hires only care about how quickly gramps gets out of their way. My statement was just facts based on what is currently happening and what has happened in the past. People were hired in 2005 and are now flowing to AA. That is all. Personally, I think that the flow is a falsehood and I will never flow. But I can say that I am still benefiting from it. Every month, 5 people move on. I move up the list every month. There are captain openings every month because of it. In addition, the people in the leadership roles (CP, Training, Ops, etc.) are moving on as well, leaving room for other people to take those roles. |
What is PDT's flow rate? 1 per ever 125 pilots on property?
What is PSA flow rate? 8 per month?? |
Originally Posted by CLT Guy
(Post 2070940)
I also just looked at my pay since I started flying the line at PSA. I divided the total credit hours by the total block hours. The equation totaled 1.61.
That means for every hour that I flew, they paid me 1.61 times my normal hourly rate. This includes extra money that I made flying SDO, junior man pay, training pay, cancellation pay, or Deadhead pay. So, lets say that my company pays $5 less per hour than another company, but that other company does not pay cancellation pay or a pilot at the other company spends a year on reserve (so they can not collect extra trip rigs), then I will still make significantly more than a pilot at the other airline. Simple hourly pay rates do not matter. At all. You can not compare companies based on hourly pay rates. Graphs like the one you posted are misleading and are useless. SAP 75,No open time, No Junior man |
Originally Posted by CLT Guy
(Post 2070986)
I'm not sure that someone that has been at an airline 10 years really qualifies to be called "gramps".
My statement was just facts based on what is currently happening and what has happened in the past. People were hired in 2005 and are now flowing to AA. That is all. Personally, I think that the flow is a falsehood and I will never flow. But I can say that I am still benefiting from it. Every month, 5 people move on. I move up the list every month. There are captain openings every month because of it. In addition, the people in the leadership roles (CP, Training, Ops, etc.) are moving on as well, leaving room for other people to take those roles. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:34 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands