Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
NY Times Article on The Pilot Shortage: >

NY Times Article on The Pilot Shortage:

Search
Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

NY Times Article on The Pilot Shortage:

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-17-2016, 11:10 AM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Posts: 10,067
Default

Originally Posted by WhiskeyKilo View Post
This is so full of bull. The GAO did a survey in 2012 and it showed here are approximately 140,000 rated ATP's, and 105,000 commercial instrument rated pilots that could take the ATP Test. The FAA gave out approximately 6400 ATP certificates in 2012 and that number is trending up.
Including military pilots who are retiring that's about 250,000 pilots that are competing for 72,000 airline jobs.

There is not a pilot shortage. There is a surplus of pilots that don't want to be paid pennies to work at the regionals. BB at Republic blamed the 1500 hour rule when he should be looking to pay his pilots more. Regional first year F/O pay is trending up but is nowhere near where it should be right now.
I'm wondering if there was anything that happened in the years leading up to 2014 that would have had an impact in the number of ATPs issued compared to the decade prior....
CBreezy is offline  
Old 04-17-2016, 11:16 AM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2014
Position: Downward-Facing Dog Pose
Posts: 1,537
Default

Originally Posted by WhiskeyKilo View Post

about 250,000 pilots are competing for 72,000 airline jobs

Needs moar cowbell.

SayAlt is offline  
Old 04-17-2016, 11:28 AM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Slick111's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2014
Posts: 742
Default From the article.....

Quote: "Researchers at Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University and the University of North Dakota, using training records from 22 regional airlines, found that newly hired pilots with 1,500 or fewer hours tended to need less training and were less likely to drop out than those with hundreds and even thousands more hours.
“The sweet spot is 700 to 800 hours,” said Elizabeth Bjerke, chairwoman of the aviation department of the University of North Dakota and an author of the study. “At that point they have experience but haven’t developed bad habits. It’s not quantity of hours but quality of hours.”
************************************************** **********

So here's a question for ya, Elizabeth Bjerke, (chairwoman of the aviation department of the University of North Dakota):
If 700 - 800 hour "sweet spot" pilots are so superior to more
experienced pilots,........... WHY ARE THE *MAJORS* NOT
CLAMOURING TO HIRE THEM?!?!?!?!?!

It's not a stretch to think that maybe Humpty-Diddle and UND's research may have suffered from some bias(es).
Slick111 is offline  
Old 04-17-2016, 11:34 AM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2011
Posts: 894
Default

Originally Posted by Slick111 View Post
Quote: "Researchers at Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University and the University of North Dakota, using training records from 22 regional airlines, found that newly hired pilots with 1,500 or fewer hours tended to need less training and were less likely to drop out than those with hundreds and even thousands more hours.
“The sweet spot is 700 to 800 hours,” said Elizabeth Bjerke, chairwoman of the aviation department of the University of North Dakota and an author of the study. “At that point they have experience but haven’t developed bad habits. It’s not quantity of hours but quality of hours.”
************************************************** **********

So here's a question for ya, Elizabeth Bjerke, (chairwoman of the aviation department of the University of North Dakota):
If 700 - 800 hour "sweet spot" pilots are so superior to more
experienced pilots,........... WHY ARE THE *MAJORS* NOT
CLAMOURING TO HIRE THEM?!?!?!?!?!

It's not a stretch to think that maybe Humpty-Diddle and UND's research may have suffered from some bias(es).
That "research" she is claiming is the biggest bunch of BS ever.
RyanP is offline  
Old 04-17-2016, 11:35 AM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2014
Position: Downward-Facing Dog Pose
Posts: 1,537
Default

Originally Posted by RyanP View Post

That "research" she is claiming is the biggest bunch of BS ever.

Yep.

Reminds me of "global warmin"....errrr...."climate change".
SayAlt is offline  
Old 04-17-2016, 11:51 AM
  #16  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Irishblackbird's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2014
Posts: 444
Default

More opportunities now, but not even close to a shortage. Riddle Diddle and UND need to justify there existance. Had a few adult bevys with a consultant to Riddle a few years back and he was telling me at that time, that Riddle wants to appeal to other students than just aviation career seeking students. They are one suited and know it. Eventually the market of kids with parents willing to drop $250k will dry up, just like the regionals.
Irishblackbird is offline  
Old 04-17-2016, 11:54 AM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
 
CaYaTeKbron's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2014
Posts: 142
Default

I don't buy the "research "...in my new hired class, there was a couple of riddle guys that needed extra training, A LOT !!!!the only thing they would talk about was how hard Riddle was and how tough the school was compared to the carrier... Confronted one of them one day and asked him, so why you need extra sim. Again!?!..one of the wonders was my sim partner...I tried to help him but he was a pighead...+1 with Slick and Say Alt...nothing against cuz am a riddle guy but the product is not there anymore !!!!!
CaYaTeKbron is offline  
Old 04-17-2016, 12:05 PM
  #18  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Irishblackbird's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2014
Posts: 444
Default

Originally Posted by Slick111 View Post
Quote: "Researchers at Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University and the University of North Dakota, using training records from 22 regional airlines, found that newly hired pilots with 1,500 or fewer hours tended to need less training and were less likely to drop out than those with hundreds and even thousands more hours.
“The sweet spot is 700 to 800 hours,” said Elizabeth Bjerke, chairwoman of the aviation department of the University of North Dakota and an author of the study. “At that point they have experience but haven’t developed bad habits. It’s not quantity of hours but quality of hours.”
************************************************** **********

So here's a question for ya, Elizabeth Bjerke, (chairwoman of the aviation department of the University of North Dakota):
If 700 - 800 hour "sweet spot" pilots are so superior to more
experienced pilots,........... WHY ARE THE *MAJORS* NOT
CLAMOURING TO HIRE THEM?!?!?!?!?!

It's not a stretch to think that maybe Humpty-Diddle and UND's research may have suffered from some bias(es).
EXACTLY^^^^^ Netjets won't even look at a pilot unless he has 2500 hours. There's a reason for that and the level of service that their clients demand and the diversity of the flying they do does not lend itself to mentoring the low time pilot.
Irishblackbird is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
trashhauler
Cargo
2
05-27-2013 06:52 AM
SkyHigh
Major
36
02-17-2009 05:54 AM
utedrummer
Flight Schools and Training
27
03-04-2008 06:41 PM
maximaman
Hangar Talk
15
09-11-2007 07:15 AM
aerospacepilot
Regional
59
07-01-2007 04:57 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices