![]() |
Originally Posted by Mesabah
(Post 2255143)
Yes, but ATL launched it's new competition in ATL initiative on September 30 2016. Do you think they are going to award those gates to Delta when they are currently trying to leverage Delta out of gates in ATL?
|
Originally Posted by Mercyful Fate
(Post 2255122)
Sorry in a labor contract like that, you don't own 100% of anything. You have an agreement with another party, both agreeing on the same terms. Which means both sides must honor that contract, which means both parties agree. Delta didn't hand over 100% of the code. You both agreed on the said terms of the contract, making both parties Co owners. Going to have to just face the music.
. What you're driving at would only make sense on the most mundane levels if, I suppose, DL/UAL/etc pilots didn't show up for work and refused to fly the code that they own. Then perhaps there would be some ability for the company to seek relief. That would technically be possible in a legal self help situation. Technically, but of course it wouldn't work, because they couldn't find 13000 scabs fast enough, and probably not nearly that many at all in any amount of time. Short of something like that, DALPA owns the DL code WRT who flies it. UAL as well as SWA too, and many others. Not all though, so maybe SKYW can fly those scope jets at some of the places that don't own their own code. That is certainly possible. But then if they did, they would run afoul of DL/UAL pilot code ownership in the first place. |
Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 2255214)
Delta would lose a few but retain most. They have a bit of clout in the Atlanta area.
|
Originally Posted by msprj2
(Post 2253717)
RIP inventor of Big Mack passed today. McDonald's awarded him a plaque for his sandwich.
|
Originally Posted by Mercyful Fate
(Post 2255375)
Man, you just cannot stay on point, and just continue to ramble on and on like a broken record. Seriously, do you realize how scattered your thoughts are? I'm starting to really wonder about you..
|
Originally Posted by msprj2
(Post 2250751)
That's a great idea if you want to see an explosion of LCC. When mainline only serves major cities
In my last 3 trips I have had legs of 1,200 and 1,300 NM and flew to 4 different countries, there's not much regional left in those regionals. "Contract airlines". |
Originally Posted by Mercyful Fate
(Post 2255375)
Man, you just cannot stay on point, and just continue to ramble on and on like a broken record. Seriously, do you realize how scattered your thoughts are? I'm starting to really wonder about you..
Sorry bro, but SKYW isn't going to fly larger RJ's for DL or anyone else for that matter, unless they go it alone. If they do, more power to em! I predict they'll make millions (following the typical recipe for becoming a millionaire in the airlines). :cool: |
Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 2254534)
Not really, a loss of revenue from 30% of their fleet would quickly put Skywest out of business. Alaska is not going to take that flying and their new contract will almost certainly include restrictions. What you completely overlook is they would also loose their UAL flying.
Exactly how "loose" would this UAL flying become?:eek::rolleyes::confused: |
Originally Posted by Paid2fly
(Post 2256007)
Exactly how "loose" would this UAL flying become?:eek::rolleyes::confused:
|
Originally Posted by Mercyful Fate
(Post 2256082)
And you just spiked the football confirming my thoughts.
SKYW is not going to get jumbo RJ's or mainline sized planes. That is simply not in their manifest destiny, unless they kill off their existing gravy train code shares and try to do it IndyAir style. That they could at least attempt that. But we all know how that would end. DL (and UAL and SKYW and many others) own their codes. Its already bought and paid for in their contracts, which never expire, and that aspect of it is not going to change short of a massive "self help" nuclear option by management trying to re-crew an airline with scabs during a legal work stoppage. But that's not going to happen either. Managements, CEO's, BOD's, shareholders or aircraft manufacturers aren't going to change that. The only other way for it to happen would be if the pilot groups who own their code willingly gave it up, or if a bankruptcy court voided it. While theoretically possible, neither will happen either. You can maybe be excused for getting lost in the moment of SKYW's meteoric rise from 30 to 50 to 70 to 90 seaters, always growing always reaching for the stars, etc. But that trend vector ends here. You've reached your service ceiling. The only way to continue is to get mainline code for things you are not allowed to fly without going it alone, and that almost definitely won't happen. If it does, best of luck. But it won't happen within DL, UAL, SWA, AA or many other codes, nor will it happen with them subsidizing them while they attempt it, because their respective pilot groups will not permit it. That is their exclusive decision, because they own and control who flies their code, and what exact terms they do so. I'm sorry if that makes you feel dabbed on. |
Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 2255214)
Delta would lose a few but retain most. They have a bit of clout in the Atlanta area.
|
Originally Posted by Mesabah
(Post 2256225)
Okay, Skywest starts operating the MRJ for Alaska, Alaska scope is the lulz, and Delta pilots file a grievance causing DAL to drop Skywest. Skywest then leases its 27 owned gates in ATL to NAI/ME3, now what? It would be monumentally stupid to cancel your agreement with Skywest under these circumstances.
|
Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 2256326)
You claim Skywest owns the gates. That would be unique since no other airline including Delta owns any gates at ATL. They are all leased and the lease agreements include a recapture if the gate is not utilized by the operating airline.
|
Originally Posted by Mesabah
(Post 2256225)
Okay, Skywest starts operating the MRJ for Alaska, Alaska scope is the lulz, and Delta pilots file a grievance causing DAL to drop Skywest. Skywest then leases its 27 owned gates in ATL to NAI/ME3, now what? It would be monumentally stupid to cancel your agreement with Skywest under these circumstances.
Won't happen anyway. |
Originally Posted by Mesabah
(Post 2256225)
Okay, Skywest starts operating the MRJ for Alaska, Alaska scope is the lulz, and Delta pilots file a grievance causing DAL to drop Skywest. Skywest then leases its 27 owned gates in ATL to NAI/ME3, now what? It would be monumentally stupid to cancel your agreement with Skywest under these circumstances.
That would be fun to watch. And DL would do just fine. |
Originally Posted by Mercyful Fate
(Post 2256246)
Thanks for another bang em up response Sybil. [/IMG]
|
Originally Posted by gloopy
(Post 2256699)
The tiny gates with no customs in the already overflowing at RJ capacity terminals are going to handle 27 gates worth of international wide bodies? :D
That would be fun to watch. And DL would do just fine. |
Originally Posted by gloopy
(Post 2256699)
The tiny gates with no customs in the already overflowing at RJ capacity terminals are going to handle 27 gates worth of international wide bodies? :D
That would be fun to watch. And DL would do just fine. |
Originally Posted by Mesabah
(Post 2256353)
Yes, Skywest subleases the gates they lease from ATL to the airline they choose, which happens to be Delta. Airlines have the option to renew their leases. I'm fully aware of how this process works, including the different categories of gate utilization in ATL, you don't need to keep repeating it.
|
Originally Posted by Mesabah
(Post 2256747)
No, not wide bodies, NAI's subsidized feeder jets.
IOW, empty threat. Oh, and to any extent that SKYW actually has a say, which is very little BTW, DL would easily be the highest bidder for most of those gates, which they would desperately need the money from (again, even assuming they had much of a say) because if they did that then by definition they were losing a massive amount of their revenue and guaranteed profits. There is zero chance (again, even if they had a say) that they would pass up more money in order to try and harm a DL out of hubris. Not worried about it in the slightest. But SKYW should be. |
Originally Posted by Mercyful Fate
(Post 2257018)
Psssst. Sorry to burst your bubble Sybil, DL is not the only game in town. If you knew and studied the company you work for, you would know a lot more than you claim. All hail the widget!
DL already has a large SWA presence in ATL, and as you know they are a fierce competitor. DL has done quite well against them. Any 27 gate new entrant would have to fight a two front war. It would actually be more than that for them, because they would have to go for the higher frequency routes and therefore also butt heads against ALG and Frontier and JB etc, so on the routes they would most likely do, they'd face razor thin margins. And again, there is absolute zero chance a SKYW termination would result in all the gates going to a single new entrant airline. No chance at all. While you may relish the thought of an outgoing revenge strike on DL for blocking your ultra large RJ manifest destiny, its just not going to happen. SKYW will only be permitted to operate your dream planes if they do it IndyAir style. And we all know how that will end up. |
Originally Posted by Mercyful Fate
(Post 2257039)
SKW doesn't have to go out and start its own operation, because they have so much market share tied up in multiple partnerships. SKW has not got where they are by making stupid decisions, and they are not going to start now. It is obvious that SKW is a huge thorn in your side, and you cannot stand it. You hate the fact that your DL has so much invested in the partnership. You don't think that SKW management back in the day didn't see the writing on the wall that having all your eggs in one basket was not a smart business model? When DL pitched a fit over SKW code sharing with UAL, who ended up winning that little tiff? Sorry dude, but you will need to face the music that SKW has a LOT of pull with your company, as well as others. You know damn well the whole scope clause thing will morph and change in the years to come, because it always does. Anyone who thinks otherwise is either blissfully ignorant, or not educating themselves.
Good luck! BTW DL didn't have a problem with SKYW flying for UAL as long as they could hold up their end of the PWA compliant CPA's. Up until now SKYW has run a good operation and have been able to do so. I'll give them credit for that all day long and have no issue with them as long as they stay within the constraints of what we permit them to do, which they will. You sound more like a SKYW manager than a pilot, but either way that's cool. DL has dealt with managers with loftier ambitions than yours in the past (CMR, ACA, etc) and will do so again when necessary. Sorry to inform you that you will not be getting larger RJ's though. It simply will not be permitted. You will have to remain within the limits set by your existing CPA's and unionized pilot PWA's. The size, weight and seat count is simply not going up for you. Sorry. The only thing that may happen is some kind of trade for more 76's in exchange for fewer 50's or 70's on a net seat/BH loss basis. We'll see what the next round of mainline PWA's does WRT that, but even that small carrot isn't looking good. But even if you do get that, you'll have to shrink to get it. |
Originally Posted by Mercyful Fate
(Post 2257062)
As far as management, pilot, janitor, lav dumper goes, lets just say I have no horse in the SKW and DL race. None of it impacts me either way. Both could vanish and it doesn't change my situation at all....
Yes, DL did have a problem with the UAL code share deal so you are dead wrong about that. That caused a massive shift on how the business model changed between majors and regionals. There is a reason those regionals like Comair and ACA no longer exist, and SKW is in the position it is. There is another reason why regionals that once puddled around in 19 seat Metro's are flying 76 seat jets in these partnerships, and that is because it is a give and take between pilot groups and management. I don't need to remind you how this happened, or how it will continue to happen in the future, because no matter what you say...you know. You guys folded like a shirt when it came to bigger equipment than the 50 seat RJs, and you will fold again. Mark my words, it will happen. |
Originally Posted by Mercyful Fate
(Post 2257062)
As far as management, pilot, janitor, lav dumper goes, lets just say I have no horse in the SKW and DL race. None of it impacts me either way. Both could vanish and it doesn't change my situation at all....
Yes, DL did have a problem with the UAL code share deal so you are dead wrong about that. That caused a massive shift on how the business model changed between majors and regionals. There is a reason those regionals like Comair and ACA no longer exist, and SKW is in the position it is. There is another reason why regionals that once puddled around in 19 seat Metro's are flying 76 seat jets in these partnerships, and that is because it is a give and take between pilot groups and management. I don't need to remind you how this happened, or how it will continue to happen in the future, because no matter what you say...you know. You guys folded like a shirt when it came to bigger equipment than the 50 seat RJs, and you will fold again. Mark my words, it will happen. Mark my words: you will never get your scope jets. Sorry bro. I know you think all trends continue forever. If that were true, then SKYW will become the new airline world order and fly every plane for every airline in existence. All trends continue, right? Every time you takeoff, you are accelerating at a rapid rate and will go super sonic in a matter of minutes! Oh wait, there's reality. The same reality that will prevent SKYW from becoming what you want it to become. So you're either a very senior/lifer pilot or a manager at SKYW. That's cool. I assure you your counterparts at CMR, ACA and other places had ambitions every bit as lofty as yours. So far we are several contracts deep into the "hold the line" mentality on your upper end. IMO the only relief you'll see is if you shrink to fly fewer RJ's already in your allowed range at the expense of more on the lower end. IOW you will have to shrink to get even that. SKYW was hardly a revolutionary with their UAL deal. Other regionals operated for more than one partner. I know you think JA is the dominant genius of the industry; many thought the same about CMR and ACA managers as well. But I agree that he is smart. Smart enough to know that his ambitions stop here, and he's better off taking his guaranteed profits and staying in his place. |
Originally Posted by Mercyful Fate
(Post 2257127)
If the majors want the regionals flying these aircraft because passengers demand it, then you can be assured somehow someway they will make it happen.
|
Originally Posted by Mercyful Fate
(Post 2257218)
You just keep telling yourself that.
|
Originally Posted by Mercyful Fate
(Post 2257221)
There is no need to pretend, and hardly little engine that could. Man, that thorn is deeep in your side. I love it.
|
Originally Posted by Mercyful Fate
(Post 2257127)
I do not agree, as the industry is in a upswing and doing just fine. But once the peak has been hit, and things decline (as they always do) that is when you see those types of change. Mitsubishi, Bombardier and Embraer jumped the gun way too soon with these types of designs, and now they will be responsible to figure out a way to make it work. If the majors want the regionals flying these aircraft because passengers demand it, then you can be assured somehow someway they will make it happen.
|
Originally Posted by Mercyful Fate
(Post 2257234)
LOL, like I told you before SKW could go away completely and would not impact me one bit. If that isn't hint enough for you, you can continue doing what ever speculating you want. For all you know, I could work for Delta. You ever considered that?
You're clearly a SKYW fanboy, which, in and of itself, I have no problem with. Like I said, they are a quality regional operator and run a fairly good show. I give them credit for that. Every place has lifers, and the "lost decade" has put more in that position than otherwise would have happened. So I get that. But the fact remains that they will not be permitted to operate larger equipment outside of a massive scope sale or an IndyAir style, all in gamble. The scope sale isn't going to happen. Your ride to the stars stops with the 76 seaters at current weights. Its possible to get more, but only as a result of horse trading for a greater reduction at the lower end, or perhaps a new deal with AS/VX or even picking up some flying currently done by other regionals. You will not be getting larger equipment from DL. That ship has sailed. If you find another way, it puts your entire DCI partnership at risk, which is why your friend JA won't do it. SKYW grew a lot because they got their pilots to "deal them an ace" when they needed it the most. But don't expect any cards under the table from DALPA. You won't be getting any. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:55 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands