Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional > Republic Airways
FTC bans all noncompete clauses >

FTC bans all noncompete clauses

Search
Notices
Republic Airways Regional Airline

FTC bans all noncompete clauses

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-23-2024, 12:09 PM
  #1  
Line Holder
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: May 2023
Posts: 66
Default FTC bans all noncompete clauses

Huge news for the Republic contract. Obviously the penalty of the liquidated damages is still insane but this should allow for freedom for those trying to move on. Federal Trade Commission Approves Ban Of Noncompete Agreements
Lilsaigon is offline  
Old 04-23-2024, 12:27 PM
  #2  
New Hire
 
Joined APC: Jan 2024
Posts: 7
Default

Originally Posted by Lilsaigon View Post
Huge news for the Republic contract. Obviously the penalty of the liquidated damages is still insane but this should allow for freedom for those trying to move on. Federal Trade Commission Approves Ban Of Noncompete Agreements
taking dubs
See yaaa is offline  
Old 04-23-2024, 02:18 PM
  #3  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,317
Default

Probably activist over reach. Business groups filing lawsuits tomorrow.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 04-23-2024, 02:47 PM
  #4  
Line Holder
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: May 2023
Posts: 66
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777 View Post
Probably activist over reach. Business groups filing lawsuits tomorrow.
So you're saying there should be a NCC? 🤔
Lilsaigon is offline  
Old 04-23-2024, 02:54 PM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Skyhawk121's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2015
Posts: 228
Default

Originally Posted by Lilsaigon View Post
So you're saying there should be a NCC? 🤔
I don't think they should apply to pilots at all, but I think they have a place, especially with high level executives that know the "secret sauce" of one company and are essentially "selling" it to the competition by going to work for them. Even then, non-competes in those circumstances are usually compensated for the duration of the non-compete, so that shouldn't be a big deal in those situations.
Skyhawk121 is offline  
Old 04-23-2024, 04:24 PM
  #6  
Perennial Reserve
 
Excargodog's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2018
Posts: 11,526
Default

Originally Posted by Lilsaigon View Post
So you're saying there should be a NCC? 🤔
He said nothing of the sort. He said it was administrative over reach. Don't shoot the messenger.

The FTC is trying to do something that is a stretch on the powers given them by law (that is, by Congressional legislation). They are at high risk of being slapped down in the courts by those people who want people to be obligated by NCCs. The whole Chevron deference issue is hanging by a thread at the Supreme Court right now,

https://news.harvard.edu/gazette/sto...stential-test/

Blame the EPA for trying to declare seasonal mud puddles to be "navigable waterways of the United States. Now it looks like all the alphabet agencies might get their discretionary powers reined in.
Excargodog is offline  
Old 04-24-2024, 03:46 AM
  #7  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2019
Position: Crew room attendant
Posts: 384
Default

Originally Posted by Lilsaigon View Post
Huge news for the Republic contract. Obviously the penalty of the liquidated damages is still insane but this should allow for freedom for those trying to move on. Federal Trade Commission Approves Ban Of Noncompete Agreements
Doesnt go into effect until on its own until later in the year, and expect it to be challenged in court. It's entirely possile a law suit could get an injuction against the rule going into effect until it has cleared all the forthcomming legal battles. You are still shackled.
StuckOnReserve is offline  
Old 04-24-2024, 04:57 AM
  #8  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2019
Posts: 1,281
Default

Originally Posted by Lilsaigon View Post
So you're saying there should be a NCC? 🤔
That's not what he said at all. But he obviously has a better understanding of the situation than you and is giving you a realistic expectation.
LoneStar32 is offline  
Old 04-24-2024, 07:57 AM
  #9  
Perennial Reserve
 
Excargodog's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2018
Posts: 11,526
Default

https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/mark...ts/ar-AA1nAmXC

WASHINGTON—The nation’s biggest business lobbying group and a national tax-services firm both sued the Federal Trade Commission on Wednesday, igniting a flare of lawsuits over the agency’s regulation aimed at ending noncompete agreements.

The U.S. Chamber of Commerce challenged the regulation in federal court in East Texas, while the tax firm Ryan LLC filed its lawsuit in Dallas. Other business groups joined the chamber’s suit, including the Business Roundtable, which represents chief executive officers of some of the country’s biggest employers.
Noncompete clauses violate a 110-year-old law that prohibits unfair methods of competition, the FTC says. The restrictions hamper competition for labor, the agency says, because employees can’t easily leave for higher pay and better benefits. Removing them would boost employee earnings by $400 billion or more over 10 years, the FTC estimates.

The Chamber’s lawsuit says policymakers and courts have for decades recognized the value of noncompete agreements, while state governments have put curbs on them “when they go too far.” The federal government has never regulated noncompete contracts, the Chamber says, and Congress never authorized the FTC to step in and take over for the states.

​​​​​​​
​​​​​​​
Excargodog is offline  
Old 04-24-2024, 08:18 AM
  #10  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,317
Default

Originally Posted by Lilsaigon View Post
So you're saying there should be a NCC? 🤔
I'm saying I don't think federal bureaucrats have the legal authority to make a sweeping prohibition. That's almost glaringly obvious so I think it will probably get thrown out.

Seems like Congress could/should pass a law with an appropriate degree of specificity.

I think NCC have a place, where somebody came in and by the nature of their job was granted full access to your IP, processes, or maybe customer base and then quickly bails for another employer who is basically hiring you (and typically paying you a premium) more for your insider info than for your skills and experience. It's a thing.

That should be limited to jobs where you are directly involved with critical competitive info, and should have a time limit... say after five or ten years you can take your years of work experience with you regardless. As opposed to leaving after four months, with a USB drive in your shoe.

NCC should not apply to burger flippers, nurses, pilots, etc. NCC have been abused when it comes to hourly laborers.
rickair7777 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Toedrag
United
23
08-08-2020 06:23 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices