Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional > Republic Airways
Republic and AA in talks on large RJ contract >

Republic and AA in talks on large RJ contract

Search
Notices
Republic Airways Regional Airline

Republic and AA in talks on large RJ contract

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-05-2012, 05:17 PM
  #41  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2010
Posts: 339
Default

Are we actually playing the "who's POS airline is better" game? Eagle 10 yr CA is 87 and RAH is 82...10 yr FO is 42 verses 37. BIG FREAKIN DEAL. Like that's the reason why AMR wants to introduce non wholly owned contract carriers.

...oh and Bolo...Frontier doesn't make money, RAH does. Frontier without RAH welfare would be gone a long time ago..
sticky is offline  
Old 09-05-2012, 05:19 PM
  #42  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Saabs's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2011
Position: Airbus button pusher
Posts: 2,447
Default

Originally Posted by theaviator View Post
You did negotiate your own contract. By choosing to work for a bottom feeder you are screwing everyone else over. You all need to grow up and see the big picture. It will never stop until people stop working there. Don't give me that crap about you not having a choice. You chose to work there. Anyone who jumps to republic at the expense of eagle pilots will forever be looked down upon by me.
Don't you think your view is a little misguided? I went to Colgan when it was a bottom feeder, and helped vote in alpa and a contract. I could say that I've done more than you ever have as you just happened to already have a contract. Not saying I believe that but saying it's an arguement.

But in reality I could care less as you need to grow up and see the big picture. Here at Pinnacle we have guys that have been and will keep going to republic. You looking down on my pilot group for doing that?
Saabs is offline  
Old 09-05-2012, 05:28 PM
  #43  
Gets Weekends Off
 
sandlapper223's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: More Drag
Posts: 447
Default

I'm sorry, but I think everyone misse dthe memo. The memo is this:

If you work for a contract airline, flying contract or "sublet" jets, no matter how big they get, no matter how we believe they should be mainline flying, no matter how sweet they look, you will not get the contract you like.

You see, management considers regional jet flying, "contract jet flying," no matter how big these CRJ's and ERJ's get. Until you work for a Brand that is it's own, and a Brand that is successful, you will continue to fight with a management team that does not consider your personal employment as value, that does not consider its own employment as value, and does not believe in its product. Like you, they are looking for the exit (and or padding their resumes or financial portfolio) until the rip cord is pulled.

Work smart, network, and get a job where the paycheck maches the paint job. Then you'll see the work rules, hotels, and job protections you seek.
sandlapper223 is offline  
Old 09-05-2012, 05:29 PM
  #44  
Gets Weekends Off
 
theaviator's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: E145 FO
Posts: 377
Default

Originally Posted by Saabs View Post
Don't you think your view is a little misguided? I went to Colgan when it was a bottom feeder, and helped vote in alpa and a contract. I could say that I've done more than you ever have as you just happened to already have a contract. Not saying I believe that but saying it's an arguement.

But in reality I could care less as you need to grow up and see the big picture. Here at Pinnacle we have guys that have been and will keep going to republic. You looking down on my pilot group for doing that?
I understand where you are coming from, it's hard to find flying jobs. But going from pinnacle to republic will not help anything! It only makes things worse by letting management know we are willing to work for **** poor wages and contracts. Have a little pride in what you do!
It's time to start telling management enough is enough! There are jobs out there that will pick up pilots, we have skills they need and want. Work somewhere else until things improve. That's really all I'm trying to say. I was a little harsh in saying I would look down on you, heat of the moment. In all honesty I wouldn't and I never have. But can't we all stand together and say its enough instead of always looking out for number one?
theaviator is offline  
Old 09-05-2012, 05:37 PM
  #45  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Posts: 511
Default

I would really like to know what you have to say to all the Eagle furloughs that went to RAH and Skywest (the two companies that will probably get a lot of American flying).
flyingreasemnky is offline  
Old 09-05-2012, 05:46 PM
  #46  
Gets Weekends Off
 
theaviator's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: E145 FO
Posts: 377
Default

Originally Posted by flyingreasemnky View Post
I would really like to know what you have to say to all the Eagle furloughs that went to RAH and Skywest (the two companies that will probably get a lot of American flying).
I wouldn't say anything different to them. I've been furloughed before. I could have Gone to Mesa or republic, they were hiring. I chose to get out of aviation for 4 years and wait it out instead.My love of flying brough me back when eagle was hiring. All I'm saying is, you have a choice. Why not say no to crappy contracts. I'm voting no to the next eagle TA, we will get shafted. I will leave, mark my words. It's not worth it.
theaviator is offline  
Old 09-05-2012, 05:49 PM
  #47  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: EMB 145 CPT
Posts: 2,934
Default

And here I thought that a regional airline was unable to bid on new flying while in negotiations, something about unknown future company expenses (pilot salary, etc).
That's just the whipsaw excuse your management sold you on.
Nevets is offline  
Old 09-05-2012, 06:45 PM
  #48  
Moderator
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B757/767
Posts: 13,088
Default

Originally Posted by sticky View Post
Are we actually playing the "who's POS airline is better" game? Eagle 10 yr CA is 87 and RAH is 82...10 yr FO is 42 verses 37. BIG FREAKIN DEAL. Like that's the reason why AMR wants to introduce non wholly owned contract carriers.

...oh and Bolo...Frontier doesn't make money, RAH does. Frontier without RAH welfare would be gone a long time ago..
Until the long term FFD gravy train contracts dry up. Then......uh oh.
johnso29 is offline  
Old 09-05-2012, 07:32 PM
  #49  
Da Hudge
 
80ktsClamp's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Poodle Whisperer
Posts: 17,473
Default

I just love a good "my outsourced flying bottom feeder carrier is better than yours" thread drift!
80ktsClamp is offline  
Old 09-05-2012, 08:48 PM
  #50  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2009
Position: B756 FO
Posts: 1,288
Talking

Originally Posted by BTpilot View Post
Just messin around as I always do in RAH threads.. Don't take it all personal and go name calling.. But I do stand on your side of the fence against backpack sporting, gel haired, sunglasses inside regional guys who sit there and go "yeah my regional is king because I fly for them".. Pleaaase.

Twice has a brickyard FO with gelled up hair and his sunglasses in his epaulets said to me while I rode "his" jumpseat, "you should totally come over here. On second year pay and it ain't bad dude.. 170 time is going to be gold in a few years".... Middle of the flight he starts explaining how autothrottles work.. I'm just shutting my eyes and this 14 year exCHQ CA is shaking his head... Fun times.
I apologize! I have not been on here much and I have not been drinking liquor for the past 5 days. Way too off my game! Never the less, I like the way you roll! Carry on!
SUX4U is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices