![]() |
Originally Posted by 4V14T0R
(Post 2117028)
No.
There is so much rampant speculation here, especially from those who don't even work for RAH. It seems to be speculation in hopes of the demise of RAH. Pretty sad really. Like others have said, most of those birds were idle already. We have tons of people in the training pipeline, just waiting around to get through. I HIGHLY doubt there will be any downgrades or furloughs. I actually think upgrades will still be coming. |
Originally Posted by Is offline
(Post 2117121)
Good luck with that.
Gotta love vultures and rabid dogs. |
Originally Posted by 4V14T0R
(Post 2117028)
No.
There is so much rampant speculation here, especially from those who don't even work for RAH. It seems to be speculation in hopes of the demise of RAH. Pretty sad really. Like others have said, most of those birds were idle already. We have tons of people in the training pipeline, just waiting around to get through. I HIGHLY doubt there will be any downgrades or furloughs. I actually think upgrades will still be coming. It reminds me when a Mesa pilot told me "They're stealing our jobs". I said that is an interesting statement since that flying at Mesa came from ACA. If you are going to be upset about others taking RAH's current flying you need to be aware of what RAH did to multiple others regionals the past decade. A big reason XJT is where it is, is due to RAH. I'm sure many XJT pilots remember what some RAH pilots were saying back to them as they took over their Continental flying. If RAH and Skywest wouldn't have hammered XJT back then, we all would have been better off, including RAH and Skywest pilots. |
Originally Posted by 404yxl
(Post 2117157)
I hope you understand the irony of your statement.
It reminds me when a Mesa pilot told me "They're stealing our jobs". I said that is an interesting statement since that flying at Mesa came from ACA. If you are going to be upset about others taking RAH's current flying you need to be aware of what RAH did to multiple others regionals the past decade. A big reason XJT is where it is, is due to RAH. I'm sure many XJT pilots remember what some RAH pilots were saying back to them as they took over their Continental flying. If RAH and Skywest wouldn't have hammered XJT back then, we all would have been better off, including RAH and Skywest pilots. Wait what did we do? Try to fight for a better contract? Let me know next time you're up for one and you demand and get one on your terms. I'm glad that appears to be one-sided to you. What I am irritated at is the salivation by the vultures on this board who seem to have no regard for others lives or families at the expense of a seniority number. Flying moves around. It happens. Show some respect is all I ask. |
Originally Posted by 4V14T0R
(Post 2117166)
Wait what did we do? Try to fight for a better contract? Let me know next time you're up for one and you demand and get one on your terms. I'm glad that appears to be one-sided to you.
What I am irritated at is the salivation by the vultures on this board who seem to have no regard for others lives or families at the expense of a seniority number. Flying moves around. It happens. Show some respect is all I ask. |
Originally Posted by Aquaticus
(Post 2117209)
Do you not remember the 69 XJT airplanes going to CHQ? Plenty of vultures on these same boards back then. That isn't a dig at you guys but an overall observation that pilots are short sighted and greedy. Anytime you have a good contract or qol you will have eager beaver idiots just starting out ready to do it for less. "You don't own the flying..." "we didn't take concessions to get the flying" "not our problem"
That may very well be true. I was not around then. I hardly think I would resort to these low rent tactics of belittling peers who could just have easily found themselves in a similar or more dire situation. This may be an anonymous board, but conducting ourselves like children in any environment should not be tolerated given the responsibility given to us on a daily basis. Aquaticus, this is not directed at you. I also realize this is likely falling on many deaf ears. |
Originally Posted by 4V14T0R
(Post 2117123)
Gotta love vultures and rabid dogs.
Every single regional on the last 15 years to go through ch11 has come out half the size and some are no longer in business. People are trying to prepare you of the harsh reality going on. Especially with delta involved, I wouldn't be suprised if the United or delta contract was completely dropped, possibly both. |
Originally Posted by lakehouse
(Post 2117257)
It's not it's people who have been in this sector for years and lived a ch11 he ll.
Every single regional on the last 15 years to go through ch11 has come out half the size and some are no longer in business. People are trying to prepare you of the harsh reality going on. Especially with delta involved, I wouldn't be suprised if the United or delta contract was completely dropped, possibly both. |
Originally Posted by Is offline
(Post 2117274)
You can bet it delta has it their way the United flying is gone....
Delta has explicitly said they will not require RAH to give up either of their contracts with AA or United. Pretty sure they even passed this along to the Endeavor MEC. Just because it happened in the past, doesn't mean it is relevant or will happen in this case, no matter how much some wish it to be so. |
Originally Posted by TurbineTime
(Post 2117292)
Delta has explicitly said they will not require RAH to give up either of their contracts with AA or United. Pretty sure they even passed this along to the Endeavor MEC.
Just because it happened in the past, doesn't mean it is relevant or will happen in this case, no matter how much some wish it to be so. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:38 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands