Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Safety
SWA “rolled” off the runway in OMA >

SWA “rolled” off the runway in OMA

Search
Notices
Safety Accidents, suggestions on improving safety, etc

SWA “rolled” off the runway in OMA

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-20-2019, 12:20 AM
  #31  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2015
Posts: 253
Default

Originally Posted by Skyward View Post
As a SWA FO, I disagree. I don’t ever fly with any of the cowboys you guys like to talk about.
Don't worry it is just whack. He is still sad that Value Jet is gone and was adsorbed by the dark side. Never mind that two other carriers did the same thing it is all about SW and being a cowboy even though that hasn't been the case in over 10 years.

I also can't remember how many people Value Jet killed by cowboying it up compared to SW. Oh, that's right about 100 times more people from an operator that was about 1/20th the size SW is now.
Bluesideup1 is offline  
Old 01-20-2019, 12:37 AM
  #32  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2016
Posts: 880
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777 View Post
"slid onto a runway overrun area after landing and while taxiing to the terminal"

Was it an overrun or a taxi issue?
Neither. It was Pilot Error
domino is offline  
Old 01-20-2019, 03:21 AM
  #33  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jan 2015
Posts: 571
Default

Originally Posted by Bluesideup1 View Post
Don't worry it is just whack. He is still sad that Value Jet is gone and was adsorbed by the dark side. Never mind that two other carriers did the same thing it is all about SW and being a cowboy even though that hasn't been the case in over 10 years.

I also can't remember how many people Value Jet killed by cowboying it up compared to SW. Oh, that's right about 100 times more people from an operator that was about 1/20th the size SW is now.
As much as I like reading a good bashfest, how in the world do you consider the Valujet crash an example of “cowboy” piloting? That flight was brought down by intentionally mislabeled hazmat that ignighted in the cargo hold.
Rahlifer is offline  
Old 01-20-2019, 06:55 AM
  #34  
Gets Weekends Off
 
WHACKMASTER's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2010
Position: DOWNGRADE COMPLETE: Thanks Gary. Thanks SWAPA.
Posts: 6,615
Default

Originally Posted by Skyward View Post
As a SWA FO, I disagree. I don’t ever fly with any of the cowboys you guys like to talk about.
And yet one airline in particular seems to make a continual habit of pavement excursions. In this instance apparently a check airman giving an FO IOE.
WHACKMASTER is offline  
Old 01-20-2019, 07:00 AM
  #35  
Gets Weekends Off
 
WHACKMASTER's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2010
Position: DOWNGRADE COMPLETE: Thanks Gary. Thanks SWAPA.
Posts: 6,615
Default

Anybody denying that SWA doesn’t have a problem with running off taxiways and runways has their head in the sand. Let’s not even talk about all the ground equipment to aircraft contact that happens all the time. Oh, then there was that light pole on the Denver ramp that lost the battle with a 737 wingtip.
WHACKMASTER is offline  
Old 01-20-2019, 07:03 AM
  #36  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2016
Posts: 6,716
Default

Originally Posted by WHACKMASTER View Post
Anybody denying that SWA doesn’t have a problem with running off taxiways and runways has their head in the sand.
Where are the comparative stats on paved surface excursions by airline? Post ‘em up.
OOfff is offline  
Old 01-20-2019, 07:03 AM
  #37  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2016
Position: 6th place
Posts: 1,826
Default

Originally Posted by jcountry View Post
I find it hard to have sympathy for SWA. Every time I see something like this, I think “they were cowboying it up.”



Maybe that’s not fair..... But after all the times I’ve seen them taxiing around at 60 knots and doing crazy ass stuff to make an approach work out....... It’s what I think.



This line of work has no place for fools. That silly ass cowboy stuff needs to stop-like at least a couple decades ago.



I’m sorry, but I just can’t overlook or excuse that kind of crap. Accidents happen. But accidents aren’t really accidents for those who tempt fate so often.



And once you’ve done this work long enough, you come to realize how little of it really comes down to “luck.”


Are you a controller? How do you know swa is doing “crazy stuff” to make approaches work out?
mainlineAF is offline  
Old 01-20-2019, 07:07 AM
  #38  
Gets Weekends Off
 
WHACKMASTER's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2010
Position: DOWNGRADE COMPLETE: Thanks Gary. Thanks SWAPA.
Posts: 6,615
Default

Originally Posted by OOfff View Post
Where are the comparative stats on paved surface excursions by airline? Post ‘em up.
Now you’re just embarrassing yourself. Seriously?!
WHACKMASTER is offline  
Old 01-20-2019, 07:08 AM
  #39  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2016
Posts: 6,716
Default

Originally Posted by WHACKMASTER View Post
Now you’re just embarrassing yourself. Seriously?!
You made the claim. Support it.
OOfff is offline  
Old 01-20-2019, 07:10 AM
  #40  
Gets Weekends Off
 
WHACKMASTER's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2010
Position: DOWNGRADE COMPLETE: Thanks Gary. Thanks SWAPA.
Posts: 6,615
Default

Originally Posted by OOfff View Post
You made the claim. Support it.
It’s glaringly obvious isn’t it?! It’s become a running joke. Most things that are running jokes are so because of the truth behind them.

Either you’re dense or a troll.
WHACKMASTER is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
JohnBurke
Safety
0
12-06-2018 01:19 PM
slujaime
Flight Schools and Training
10
12-28-2016 11:30 AM
Huck
Safety
607
10-05-2014 05:27 AM
USMCFLYR
Safety
2
09-14-2012 04:04 AM
PurpleFreight
Hangar Talk
11
06-17-2010 12:54 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices