![]() |
Originally Posted by 2StgTurbine
(Post 2837417)
Huh? The 757 is one of the nicest planes to land. It has a huge wing with lots of lift, tail strikes aren't an issue (in the 200 at least), lots of crosswind capability, low approach speeds, and great brakes.
Performing a nice flare at 30 feet and 135 knots in the 757 is way easier than arresting the controlled crash of a 737-800 at 160 knots 10 feet above the ground while trying not to hit the tail and worrying about brake temperatures when deciding what turn off to aim for. |
Cute. An anatomy-measuring contest over landing light twins.
|
Originally Posted by crflyer
(Post 2837870)
How about you enlighten us all
Did ya git it? :D |
Originally Posted by ChecklistMonkey
(Post 2837881)
Think a -800 is hard? I'd hate to see you land a -900
I was replying to someone who thought the 757 was too hard for new hires. My point was if a new hire can land a 737, then there is no problem putting new hires in the 757. |
Originally Posted by TiredSoul
(Post 2837907)
Listen-carefully-two-ding-an-airplane-and-two-move-up....
Did ya git it? :D |
The joke part did not go over my head. Still waiting on the flow info.
|
Originally Posted by JohnBurke
(Post 2837904)
Cute. An anatomy-measuring contest over landing light twins.
Filler. |
Originally Posted by Floyd
(Post 2837246)
I'd say that public comment on this would be grossly inappropriate.
|
Originally Posted by crflyer
(Post 2837991)
The joke part did not go over my head. Still waiting on the flow info.
|
Originally Posted by JohnBurke
(Post 2838340)
It went over your head.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:00 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands