Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Safety
Alaska SNA [MLG Failure] >

Alaska SNA [MLG Failure]

Search
Notices
Safety Accidents, suggestions on improving safety, etc

Alaska SNA [MLG Failure]

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-22-2023, 06:50 AM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
CousinEddie's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2012
Posts: 1,083
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun View Post
Hard landings are way up industry wide. Most of them never make the news. United alone has lost 3 airframes recently to hard landings. It’s a discussion item at high levels in airline management. I made no specific comment on this accident. I stated major airlines. I am not on the 737 but I have a lot of time flying the aircraft. The hard landing issues are not fleet specific. The one issue in many seems to be limited experience and a perhaps checkered training background. Before you jump on that statement I have zero knowledge of the background of the pilots in this accident. It’s a bit of a sensitive subject for me because the closest I came to damaging an aircraft was a copilot that turned out to have required extensive extra training in both their aircraft checkouts. Prior to the last three years I would not have had to deal with the issue as the pilot in question would have been washed out. We need as a collective industry to stop lowering performance minimums.
Again, let's see what the facts are. You posted the comment on this thread within hours of the occurrence. It is obvious what your intent is. Perhaps you recall how an NG handles in strong, gusty winds when you have to use flaps 40? Not as well as a Max does. Add to that a short, wet runway at night. I'm well aware of the rest of what you are stating. How do we even know if there isn't a maintenance angle to this event yet?
CousinEddie is offline  
Old 08-22-2023, 06:52 AM
  #12  
All is fine at .79
 
TiredSoul's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2016
Position: Paahlot
Posts: 4,084
Default

Not as well as a Max does.
Yeah we all know how good the MAX is.
Do they even call it that or did they have to change the name?
TiredSoul is offline  
Old 08-22-2023, 06:55 AM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
CousinEddie's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2012
Posts: 1,083
Default

Originally Posted by TiredSoul View Post
Yeah we all know how good the MAX is.
Do they even call it that or did they have to change the name?
So you've flown it? Just noting that one handles better at flaps 40 than the other under certain conditions. That's all.
CousinEddie is offline  
Old 08-22-2023, 07:07 AM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,273
Default

Originally Posted by CousinEddie View Post
Again, let's see what the facts are. You posted the comment on this thread within hours of the occurrence. It is obvious what your intent is. Perhaps you recall how an NG handles in strong, gusty winds when you have to use flaps 40? Not as well as a Max does. Add to that a short, wet runway at night. I'm well aware of the rest of what you are stating. How do we even know if there isn't a maintenance angle to this event yet?
My intent was simple. There have been a lot of approach/landing incidents recently. The 737-800 was one of the nicest landing aircraft I flew. Made the 727 seem like a demonic machine in comparison. Don’t know a thing about the Max other than don’t hand the aircraft over to a 200 hour copilot in the middle of a flight control malfunction down low.
sailingfun is offline  
Old 08-22-2023, 08:39 AM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
ugleeual's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: 767/757 CA
Posts: 2,610
Default

He can post whatever opinion he wants… with that being said, I’ll agree that it appears more landing issues occurring over the past few years during the hiring ramp up of many carriers.
ugleeual is offline  
Old 08-22-2023, 09:00 AM
  #16  
What's a weekend?
 
Avgeek7248's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2017
Position: Widget FO
Posts: 457
Default

To me the landing just looked like they did a minimal flare/no flare from the video. Hard to tell with it being night. In the event they had a high wind additive, flaps 40, with no flare that's what a 1,000-1,500 fpm descent at touchdown/impact? The 73 is one tough machine and Idk what that descent rate translates to in G force but it doesn't seem like enough to send the MLG through the entire wing like that. Possible windshear with the weather present that day. Curious to see the data and what is found. I'm just glad everyone is okay.

Last edited by Avgeek7248; 08-22-2023 at 09:28 AM.
Avgeek7248 is offline  
Old 08-22-2023, 09:16 AM
  #17  
Orbis Non Sufficit
 
Nucflash's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2015
Posts: 730
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun View Post
The 737-800 was one of the nicest landing aircraft I flew. Made the 727 seem like a demonic machine in comparison. Don’t know a thing about the Max other than don’t hand the aircraft over to a 200 hour copilot in the middle of a flight control malfunction down low.
While that shines absolutely zero light on the accident in question, it does provide us all with yet one more irrelevant interweb post. What’s next, commentary on the handling characteristics of the 707?? Let the NTSB take it from here….
Nucflash is offline  
Old 08-22-2023, 09:51 AM
  #18  
Strike averted!
 
at6d's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2015
Position: B737
Posts: 3,643
Default

Originally Posted by Nucflash View Post
While that shines absolutely zero light on the accident in question, it does provide us all with yet one more irrelevant interweb post. What’s next, commentary on the handling characteristics of the 707?? Let the NTSB take it from here….
Curious. At WN our FO’s do the landings at SNA normally because the captains do our outdated noise abatement takeoffs there.

Does Alaska have any of this?

Regarding a flare, the 737-800 at flaps 40 requires very little flare.

It will be interesting to see the data when it comes out.
at6d is offline  
Old 08-22-2023, 09:56 AM
  #19  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Vito's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: 757/767 Capt
Posts: 642
Default

Let the NTSB take it from here….

And we’ll find out what happened in 3 years after everyone has forgotten it. I’m still waiting for the NTSB report on the AA/Delta near miss, runway incursion,at JFK that happened in January.
Vito is offline  
Old 08-22-2023, 10:22 AM
  #20  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2016
Position: 737 tiller master
Posts: 288
Default

As much as we'd like to jump on the "lack of experience" band wagon, it certainly wasn't the causal factor in this case. We all have bad days and no one but the crew knows exactly what transpired. As others have said, let's let the people in the know do their thing. One huge take away from attending the USAF Safety Officer course many moons ago was that I stopped "kicking" the mishap crews. Anything can happen in any given moment to the best of us. Out of respect for our fellow pilots, let's not post any derogatory comments. Remember, **** happens and you could be next.
Arctichicken is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mike734
Alaska
42
01-12-2022 12:10 AM
TheFly
Regional
16
06-16-2015 10:48 AM
Splanky
Regional
47
01-28-2011 07:59 AM
Lone Palm
Regional
5
01-25-2011 09:48 AM
Freight Dog
Major
1
05-02-2005 07:01 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices