QX2059 Jumpseater tries to shutdown engines
12-09-2023, 03:00 PM
#473
Disinterested Third Party
Joined APC: Jun 2012
Posts: 6,077
Stan's post was a disaster, as are his comments, but it was your post that quoted me, and mixed in his words. Don't pass off your laziness or inability on someone else. Yes, Stan posted badly, but that didn't put words in my mouth. Yours did, adding Stan's comments, and by usse of my comments bolded as quoting me, thus made it appear as though you were responding to my words.
Speak for yourself, if you think you're able. I speak very well for myself.
You really can't cite Stan's mistakes when you repost them, withthout fixing the error (because it became YOUR error), nor can you excuse yourself by blaming another. Nor should you continue to blame me, or another poster, for your own errors. I'm quite calm. I need no snickers. It wasn't Stan, but you, with the problem here, and who is in error, and it isn't Stan who's making excuses or blaming others. It's you. Enough.
Speak for yourself, if you think you're able. I speak very well for myself.
You really can't cite Stan's mistakes when you repost them, withthout fixing the error (because it became YOUR error), nor can you excuse yourself by blaming another. Nor should you continue to blame me, or another poster, for your own errors. I'm quite calm. I need no snickers. It wasn't Stan, but you, with the problem here, and who is in error, and it isn't Stan who's making excuses or blaming others. It's you. Enough.
12-09-2023, 03:21 PM
#474
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2011
Position: 737 FO
Posts: 2,487
Originally Posted by JohnBurke
Stan's post was a disaster, as are his comments, but it was your post that quoted me, and mixed in his words. Don't pass off your laziness or inability on someone else. Yes, Stan posted badly, but that didn't put words in my mouth. Yours did, adding Stan's comments, and by usse of my comments bolded as quoting me, thus made it appear as though you were responding to my words.
Speak for yourself, if you think you're able. I speak very well for myself.
You really can't cite Stan's mistakes when you repost them, withthout fixing the error (because it became YOUR error), nor can you excuse yourself by blaming another. Nor should you continue to blame me, or another poster, for your own errors. I'm quite calm. I need no snickers. It wasn't Stan, but you, with the problem here, and who is in error, and it isn't Stan who's making excuses or blaming others. It's you. Enough.
Speak for yourself, if you think you're able. I speak very well for myself.
You really can't cite Stan's mistakes when you repost them, withthout fixing the error (because it became YOUR error), nor can you excuse yourself by blaming another. Nor should you continue to blame me, or another poster, for your own errors. I'm quite calm. I need no snickers. It wasn't Stan, but you, with the problem here, and who is in error, and it isn't Stan who's making excuses or blaming others. It's you. Enough.
12-11-2023, 07:22 AM
#477
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2018
Posts: 2,377
Originally Posted by word302
Lol. I guarantee there are many at each operator. You couldn't be more wrong.
Also, How are you so terrible at quoting?
Also, How are you so terrible at quoting?
https://www.dailywire.com/news/jetbl...-to-fly-planes
12-11-2023, 08:29 AM
#479
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2011
Position: 737 FO
Posts: 2,487
Originally Posted by ThumbsUp
12-11-2023, 08:23 PM
#480
Disinterested Third Party
Joined APC: Jun 2012
Posts: 6,077
Originally Posted by word302
Well that one surprises me but like I said, I guarantee there are many pilots with felony convictions at every single operator out there.
You "guarantee" that every operator has "many pilots" with felony convictions?
Show your work.
Stan just asked you if "You actually think there are no convicted felons who hold current ATPs or for that matter, fly 121?" Your reply was "yep." A plain English rendering of his question, which you quoted, and to which you replied, asks if you belive there are no felons with ATPs or who fly for Part 121, and you replied "yep." Your reply, indicating that you do believe there are no convicted felons who hold current ATP's or fly under Part 121, is contradicted by your subsequent statements that you "guarantee" pilots with felony convictions are found at "every single operator."
You state you believe that there are no felons with current ATP certificates or operating under 121, then turn around and "guarantee" that every operator employs them.
Do you actually think before you touch a keyboard?
Let's see your guarantee.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
