Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Safety
Turn Off All Electronic Devices >

Turn Off All Electronic Devices

Search
Notices
Safety Accidents, suggestions on improving safety, etc

Turn Off All Electronic Devices

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-18-2011, 11:10 AM
  #1  
Administrator
Thread Starter
 
vagabond's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Position: C-172
Posts: 8,024
Default Turn Off All Electronic Devices

I admit that I wait until the very last moment to turn off my beloved Palm, but I do have it off during the flight.

NYT: Why phones can interfere with flight safety - Travel - Business Travel - msnbc.com
vagabond is offline  
Old 01-18-2011, 01:37 PM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
USMCFLYR's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: FAA 'Flight Check'
Posts: 13,837
Default

I heard some buzzing in the headsets the other night in the sim. The other pilot and the IP said it must be someone's cell phone going off. I've heard others on here say that they can tell. I try to follow the rules the best I can.

We are still a nation of fear in many ways though in my opinion.
“Then there are the outliers — a cellphone that’s been dropped and abused, or a battery that puts out more than it’s supposed to, and avionics that are more susceptible to interference because gaskets have failed. And boom, that’s where you get interference. It would be a perfect storm that would combine to create an aviation accident.”
This is the type of person who worries about the next asteriod or if the apples he eats each day really have enough Alar on them to harm him. Never mind that the amount of Alar required to produce those results was staggering:
While Alar has been verified as a human carcinogen, the amount necessary for it to be dangerous may well be extremely high.[citation needed] The lab tests that prompted the scare required an amount of Alar equal to over 5,000 gallons (20,000 L) of apple juice per day.[citation needed] Consumers Union ran its own studies and estimated the human lifetime cancer risk to be 5 per million, as compared to the previously-reported figure of 50 cases per million.[5] Generally, EPA considers lifetime cancer risks in excess of 1 per million to be cause for action.[citation needed]
USMCFLYR
USMCFLYR is offline  
Old 01-18-2011, 01:56 PM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2008
Position: The Far Side
Posts: 968
Default

Originally Posted by attributed to Bill Strauss
and avionics that are more susceptible to interference because gaskets have failed
Radio gasket? Think he meant shielding?
rotorhead1026 is offline  
Old 01-20-2011, 06:45 PM
  #4  
Retired
 
DYNASTY HVY's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: whale wrangler
Posts: 3,527
Default

Interesting but dated read on foreign carriers that allow cell use.
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/29/te.../29phones.html

Last edited by DYNASTY HVY; 01-21-2011 at 02:02 AM. Reason: wondering what the prize is for 2000 posts ?
DYNASTY HVY is offline  
Old 01-20-2011, 08:06 PM
  #5  
Are we there yet??!!
 
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,010
Default

Originally Posted by rotorhead1026 View Post
Radio gasket? Think he meant shielding?

The gasket is in place to keep all the magic smoke inside the radio.
Thedude is offline  
Old 01-29-2011, 09:44 PM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Airhoss's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Sleeping in the black swan’s nest.
Posts: 5,709
Default

I can neither confirm or deny at this conjuncture whether or not airline pilots have ever left their electronic devices turned on in their flight bags for an entire flight with no adverse affects.

Airhoss is offline  
Old 01-30-2011, 04:11 AM
  #7  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2010
Posts: 327
Default

Originally Posted by Airhoss View Post
I can neither confirm or deny at this conjuncture whether or not airline pilots have ever left their electronic devices turned on in their flight bags for an entire flight with no adverse affects.

Not just pilots.. passengers too, as the article says. Its not just forgetting to turn them off. Its ignoring the instructions. I think a lot of passengers don't believe there is a real safety concern. They're probably right. Otherwise, we'd have planes falling out of the sky on a regular basis. Proving the link wouldn't be difficult at all.

Anyone see the Myth Busters episode? Well, its a TV show made for entertainment, I know. But they went to great lengths to try and create interference on a Falcon 2000 (if I remember right). They didn't totally debunk the myth.. but their result was similar to a common maintenance entry.. "Unable to duplicate malfunction on the ground."

Last edited by AKASHA; 01-30-2011 at 04:22 AM.
AKASHA is offline  
Old 01-30-2011, 07:16 AM
  #8  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,317
Default

An old style analog cell phone used in the rear of the CRJ-200 can trigger the cargo smoke caution. There's no way to access the cargo bay in flight, so it's mandatory bottle-blow and divert to nearest suitable. Maybe not a huge safety issue but certainly an inconvenience and waste of tens of thousands of dollars (the bottles are not cheap).

To make matters worse, the analog phones would actually work in the flight levels, but not sure if anyone even uses those anymore.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 01-30-2011, 08:04 AM
  #9  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2010
Posts: 327
Default

Well, that may be. And I have heard a cell phone going off through a buzzing in the headset.. USMCFLYR touched on that. But I'm skeptical about the risk to safety. Boeing concluded in their own study..

"As a result of these and other investigations, Boeing has not been able to find a definite correlation between PEDs and the associated reported airplane anomalies."

Correct me if I'm wrong here, but the use of cellphones on aircraft is not prohibited by FAA regulations, notwithstanding a company's GOM. It is an FCC rule.
AKASHA is offline  
Old 01-30-2011, 08:12 AM
  #10  
Gets Weekends Off
 
USMCFLYR's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: FAA 'Flight Check'
Posts: 13,837
Default

Originally Posted by AKASHA View Post
Well, that may be. And I have heard a cell phone going off through a buzzing in the headset.. USMCFLYR touched on that. But I'm skeptical about the risk to safety. Boeing concluded in their own study..

"As a result of these and other investigations, Boeing has not been able to find a definite correlation between PEDs and the associated reported airplane anomalies."

Correct me if I'm wrong here, but the use of cellphones on aircraft is not prohibited by FAA regulations, notwithstanding a company's GOM. It is an FCC rule.
True, but remember that my personal experience that once was in the simulator, and I didn't even recognize it for what it (supposedly) was. My sim partner and the instructor each said that someone's cell phone in back must have been going off.

USMCFLYR
USMCFLYR is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Cubdriver
Flight Schools and Training
14
06-15-2011 05:59 PM
captnmajic
Major
2
01-07-2010 05:49 PM
ufgatorpilot
Technical
6
11-02-2009 08:03 AM
ToiletDuck
Career Questions
19
12-13-2007 10:09 PM
jeff122670
Regional
3
10-04-2006 12:40 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices