Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Safety
TSA and Ottawa.... >

TSA and Ottawa....

Search
Notices
Safety Accidents, suggestions on improving safety, etc

TSA and Ottawa....

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-04-2011, 05:38 PM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
 
DryMotorBoatin's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2008
Position: Seat 0B
Posts: 1,214
Default

DryMotorBoatin is offline  
Old 09-04-2011, 05:40 PM
  #22  
I'm a man of my word.
 
CaptainCarl's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Position: Devil's Advocate
Posts: 2,883
Default

Originally Posted by galaxy flyer View Post
Always fun, winding up the young and impressionable
Even more fun knowing I'll outlive you
CaptainCarl is offline  
Old 09-04-2011, 05:44 PM
  #23  
ILL BEE DAT
Thread Starter
 
Salukipilot4590's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: Rollin' Down tha 405
Posts: 2,550
Default



Originally Posted by galaxy flyer View Post
Read the Canadian TSB report that I was referring to, FIRST, then you can make more informed comments. I was referring to the TSA's record of overruns at CYOW.
Sir, I swears I lern to read n write if you's jus post dis report mistuh.

(sarcasm and smart-assness (sp) aside, I've been looking for that report for a LONG time... My information came from the CA of said flight)

Saluki pilot, you are the one making judgements without facts, the presence or absence of grooving may have been a factor at all. 35 years, 5 types rating, 3 military types and 12,000 hours, want to trade jobs?


35 years and you still haven't learned to not talk excrement when a fellow aviator has an accident.

Apologies would be in order, if I was making reference to conclusions on THIS incident, I wasn't.
We'll wait.

Always fun, winding up the young and impressionable

GF
Salukipilot4590 is offline  
Old 09-04-2011, 06:10 PM
  #24  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2010
Position: Left-out 145
Posts: 136
Default

Originally Posted by galaxy flyer View Post
Read the Canadian TSB report that I was referring to, FIRST, then you can make more informed comments. I was referring to the TSA's record of overruns at CYOW.

Saluki pilot, you are the one making judgements without facts, the presence or absence of grooving may have been a factor at all. 35 years, 5 types rating, 3 military types and 12,000 hours, want to trade jobs?

Apologies would be in order, if I was making reference to conclusions on THIS incident, I wasn't.

Always fun, winding up the young and impressionable

GF
Do not follow sentence
AZ wildcat is offline  
Old 09-04-2011, 06:21 PM
  #25  
18 Day Gear Monkey
 
Herbie's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: Phenom Gear Jockey
Posts: 171
Default

Originally Posted by AZ wildcat View Post
Do not follow sentence
It would seem to sum it up, the whole statement is "I have a lot of hours in a few different airplanes, so therefore I am a much better pilot than all of you and in turn, am fully capable of determining whose fault an incident is without the facts and can assign blame at my own will." Might have missed a few items, but that is the gist that I get.
Herbie is offline  
Old 09-04-2011, 06:30 PM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
 
DryMotorBoatin's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2008
Position: Seat 0B
Posts: 1,214
Default

Originally Posted by galaxy flyer View Post
It cannot be good when the local press has file photos of your overruns. The is the third Trans States (call sign: Waterski, how appropriate)

Lack of grooved surfaces, hell, lack of piloting.

GF




way to insult an ENTIRE airline's pilot group.
DryMotorBoatin is offline  
Old 09-04-2011, 06:34 PM
  #27  
Gets Weekends Off
 
galaxy flyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2010
Position: Baja Vermont
Posts: 5,177
Default

Read the report, FIRST,

TSA Overrun at CYOW
galaxy flyer is offline  
Old 09-04-2011, 06:53 PM
  #28  
Gets Weekends Off
 
DryMotorBoatin's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2008
Position: Seat 0B
Posts: 1,214
Default

ok...i read it...now what? you got a quiz for me or somthing? you make it sound like it was total negligence on the part of the crew. not quite the way the report makes it sound.
DryMotorBoatin is offline  
Old 09-04-2011, 07:09 PM
  #29  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2008
Posts: 164
Default

Originally Posted by DryMotorBoatin View Post
you make it sound like it was total negligence on the part of the crew. not quite the way the report makes it sound.
pages 8-9 outline contributing factors. it was mostly crew. the report even states had they landed where they were supposed to they, of course this is not guaranteed, shouldve kept they plane on the runway. you have to admit, at the least, they didnt do a good job. there is a reason they tried to erase the cvr.

Originally Posted by galaxy flyer View Post
Lack of grooved surfaces, hell, lack of piloting.
probably a way to say this without sounding like an a$$h0le. that you chose this way speaks to your character. fyi..the crew in the 2nd incident was found at no fault whatsoever, and did a hell of a job with putting that aircraft in the safest spot possible on the runoff.


i think all of us that have flown the 145 know how effective the tr's are. and we are all of the belief that at least the 1st 2, and im sure now the 3rd occurrence couldve been prevented with tr's and/or grooved runways. and yes, thats even with how $hiHy the 1st occurrence was flown.
expectholding is offline  
Old 09-04-2011, 07:27 PM
  #30  
I'm a man of my word.
 
CaptainCarl's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Position: Devil's Advocate
Posts: 2,883
Default

Originally Posted by galaxy flyer View Post
The runway was 32. It cannot be good when the local press has file photos of your overruns. The is the third Trans States (call sign: Waterski, how appropriate) overrun at CYOW. The report on the one in 2004 was kind of ugly, poor, unstabilized approach, long landing, etc.
*---Right here---
Lack of grooved surfaces, hell, lack of piloting.

GF
Here's the problem* with your post, galaxy: Your first paragraph makes sense and I even find some humor in the Waterski quip. However, when you start the second paragraph, we assume (rightly so) that you are making a comment on the current topic. Correct me if I am wrong, but I believe you were making the "lack of piloting" statement in relation to the accident that happened in 2004. And after reading the report, I tend to agree that the "piloting" could have been better. Just future reference, try to make it clear exactly what you're saying.

So, now that we've cleared that up...
CaptainCarl is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices