Notices
Safety Accidents, suggestions on improving safety, etc

Rest rules

Old 12-23-2011, 04:12 AM
  #81  
With The Resistance
 
jungle's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Burning the Agitprop of the Apparat
Posts: 6,191
Default

Originally Posted by MD10PLT View Post
The IPA law suit is a nice gesture but doesn't stand a chance at changing anything. First look back through history, it takes on average 10 years for a law to make its way through the system and be changed by a court (unless it is politically charged). Even if they prevail we will not see any changes for at least 10-15 years. Look at the Exxon Valdez case, it was settled in 2006, 17 years after the event. Do you think UPS and the FAA can stonewall as well as Exxon. Second, they really have no chance of winning. All the FAA needs to do is point out there are multiple sets of rules companies fly under. This is just one more set, of many.
Correct, this just amounts to wasting the dues of the membership.

The positive side of this is that UPS/FEDEX both have excellent rest rules already in place that in most cases exceed FAA requirements.
jungle is offline  
Old 12-24-2011, 03:08 PM
  #82  
Gets Weekends Off
 
LeftWing's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2008
Position: seated beer curl
Posts: 406
Default

Originally Posted by UPSFO4LIFE View Post
hate to say it, but we lost this in the OMB, which is controlled by the White House. The lobbyists ware able to get the change during the budgeting process. The OMB's purview is to cost out rules/laws, not change them. This whole thing is totally corrupt, regardless of party. Follow the money....

What he said!!!!! Hate to tell ya, UPS has spent the past few months lobbying the WH and the OMB, not congress. The IPA has also been very active in visits to the WH. The WH had FINAL say in what and who was included in the new rest rules. While I think they are all scumbags, the final say came from 1600 Pennsyvania Ave. Nothing else to really "explain"!

Also here is clip from our Union Leader!!!

The FAA yielded to "unprecedented industry pressure" in exempting cargo airlines from the rules, Robert Travis, president of the Independent Pilots Association, said in a statement. The union represents pilots at United Parcel Service Inc.

"Today, the executive branch has decided that the price of aviation safety, in the form of new pilot rest rules, is too high," Travis said.
mmm, okay, that settles it then.
LeftWing is offline  
Old 12-25-2011, 08:42 PM
  #83  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 41
Default

Originally Posted by viperdriver View Post
1 The projected cost for all-cargo operations is $306 million ($214 million present value at 7% and $252
million at 3%). The projected benefit of avoiding one fatal all-cargo accident ranges between $20.35
million and $32.55 million, depending on the number of crewmembers on board the aircraft.

Found this nugget on page 13
Now I'm confused. Since when did the gov'mnt give a cr@p about how much money was spent??
sharkbait is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
KingBird50
Safety
6
12-21-2011 05:07 PM
Coto Pilot
Major
125
03-15-2011 03:28 AM
steel
Cargo
28
02-18-2011 07:56 PM
beech_nut
Hangar Talk
30
07-13-2008 06:58 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread