Are glass cockpits making pilots lazy?
#11
FWIW - I was in Afghanistan with a Brit C-130 instructor who told me they had some Virgin pilots at their Christmas party one year. After some talking they headed over to the Herc sim and lo and behold none of the pilots could handfly it to a landing. Sad.
I've only got about 1,000 hours now, but less than 1.0 of that is on auto pilot. I definitely think it makes a difference.
Would you rather have a systems manager fly your plane or a pilot.
I've only got about 1,000 hours now, but less than 1.0 of that is on auto pilot. I definitely think it makes a difference.
Would you rather have a systems manager fly your plane or a pilot.
For T/O, LDG, and emergencies involving control or departure from the envelope, well then I still need a good stick.
Bottom line...you need to be able to do both. It's not that much of a problem in the US, it's more of an issue overseas where pilots often don't grow up in general aviation...our guys (especially now that we have the ATP rule) get to develop some stick-and-rudder skills.
But I've seen good GA pilots fail airline training because they couldn't "get" the systems aspect. You can be a good GA pilot but still not be quite smart (or tech-savvy) enough to manage a modern glass airliner.
#12
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2013
Position: CA
Posts: 1,211
Glass has it's pro's and cons. I see plenty of FOs at my regional who really lack an understanding about basic flying skills....Pitch, Power, Performance etc...They've essentially turned into cruise controls (on the RJ).
90% of their time is focused on the speed tape and trend vector...They then cyclically over correct....Time spent on power settings is nil.
90% of their time is focused on the speed tape and trend vector...They then cyclically over correct....Time spent on power settings is nil.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post